DoD's $25.2M Barracks Construction Contract Awarded to Clark Caddell Joint Venture

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,234,491 ($25.2M)

Contractor: Clark Caddell a Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-08-31

End Date: 2012-10-28

Contract Duration: 789 days

Daily Burn Rate: $32.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION OF WT COMPLEX BARRACKS

Place of Performance

Location: FORT STEWART, LIBERTY County, GEORGIA, 31314

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.2 million to CLARK CADDELL A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: CONSTRUCTION OF WT COMPLEX BARRACKS Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract was a delivery order under a larger contract, indicating potential for follow-on work. 3. Firm fixed-price contract type generally offers cost certainty for the government. 4. The project duration of 789 days points to a significant construction undertaking. 5. The contract was awarded to a joint venture, which can bring combined expertise to large projects. 6. The contract was awarded in Georgia, indicating a specific geographic focus for the construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific construction contract is challenging without comparable project data. The firm fixed-price nature provides some cost control, but the total award amount of $25.2 million for barracks construction needs to be assessed against the scope, size, and quality of the facilities delivered. Without detailed specifications or cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the presence of multiple bidders in a full and open competition suggests that pricing was likely scrutinized.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 3 bids were received. A competitive process like this is generally expected to yield fair market prices as contractors vie for the award. The level of competition, with multiple bidders, suggests that the market for this type of construction service is active.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Service members will benefit from new or improved barracks facilities, enhancing quality of life. The construction services delivered will contribute to the modernization of military infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation in Georgia where the barracks are being built. The project likely created temporary employment opportunities for construction workers and related trades in the Georgia area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise, despite fixed-price contract.
Dependence on the joint venture's ability to manage complex construction logistics effectively.
Risk of delays impacting soldier readiness if construction timelines are not met.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to a joint venture may leverage specialized expertise for a complex project.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process that likely resulted in competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector is a significant part of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to facility upgrades. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction. Federal spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain and modernize government facilities, including military installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or cost per bed for similar barracks construction projects across different military branches and geographic locations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities offered by the prime contractor, Clark Caddell Joint Venture. The extent of small business involvement would depend on the subcontracting plan developed by the joint venture and the nature of the construction work required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting office. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction, Army
Family Housing Construction
Barracks and Dormitory Construction
General Building Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns
Schedule delay risk
Unforeseen site conditions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.2 million to CLARK CADDELL A JOINT VENTURE. CONSTRUCTION OF WT COMPLEX BARRACKS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CLARK CADDELL A JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-08-31. End: 2012-10-28.

What is the track record of Clark Caddell Joint Venture on similar federal construction projects?

Assessing the track record of Clark Caddell Joint Venture requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving military construction or similar large-scale building projects. Information on their past performance, including any history of contract modifications, disputes, or performance issues, would be available through sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). A joint venture's track record is often a composite of its individual member firms' histories. Understanding their experience with firm fixed-price contracts and projects of similar magnitude and complexity is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this barracks construction.

How does the cost per square foot of this barracks construction compare to industry benchmarks?

To compare the cost per square foot, we would need the total square footage of the constructed barracks and the final contract value, including any modifications. Federal agencies often use cost estimating guides and historical data to benchmark construction costs. For barracks, typical benchmarks might consider factors like the number of beds, amenities provided, and the complexity of the building systems (HVAC, plumbing, electrical). Without the square footage, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the initial award of $25.2 million for a significant construction project suggests a substantial investment, and the value would be assessed against the quality and scope of the delivered facility relative to market rates for similar military housing construction.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price construction contract?

The primary risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract, even with a reputable joint venture, include potential cost overruns if the contractor miscalculates expenses or encounters unforeseen site conditions. While the government's financial exposure is capped at the contract price, delays can still occur if the contractor struggles with profitability. For the contractor, the risk is higher as they bear the brunt of cost increases. Specific risks for this project could include material price volatility, labor shortages, or unexpected subsurface conditions at the construction site. Effective project management and contingency planning by the contractor are key to mitigating these risks.

How effective is the Department of the Army in managing large construction projects like this barracks complex?

The effectiveness of the Department of the Army in managing large construction projects is generally assessed through project completion rates, adherence to budget and schedule, and the quality of the final product. The Army Corps of Engineers often plays a significant role in overseeing such projects. Factors contributing to effectiveness include robust project planning, experienced contracting officers, diligent oversight, and clear communication channels. Conversely, challenges can arise from bureaucratic processes, funding fluctuations, and the sheer scale of infrastructure needs. Performance on contracts like this one, awarded through full and open competition, provides data points for evaluating their management capabilities.

What has been the historical spending trend for barracks construction by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending trends for barracks construction by the Department of the Army are typically driven by military readiness requirements, troop levels, and infrastructure modernization initiatives. Over the years, there has been a consistent need for investment in military housing to ensure adequate living conditions for service members. Spending can fluctuate based on congressional appropriations, national security priorities, and the lifecycle of existing facilities. Analyzing past spending data, often available through federal procurement databases, would reveal patterns in contract awards, average project costs, and the types of construction methods employed for barracks over different fiscal years.

Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued for this project?

To determine if there were significant contract modifications or change orders for this project, one would need to consult the contract's official modification history. Such modifications can arise due to changes in project scope, unforeseen site conditions, or adjustments to timelines. Significant modifications could impact the total contract value and duration. The Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) typically records these modifications, providing details on the nature and value of each change. Analyzing these modifications is crucial for understanding the project's evolution and the contractor's ability to adapt to evolving requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W9126G07R0122

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2502 N ROCKY POINT DR, TAMPA, FL, 33607

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,234,491

Exercised Options: $25,234,491

Current Obligation: $25,234,491

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9126G08D0051

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline