DoD's $30.4M Herbert Hoover Dike project awarded to Trevicos South, Inc. for flood control

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,442,013 ($30.4M)

Contractor: Treviicos South, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-10

End Date: 2013-05-23

Contract Duration: 986 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IDIQ HERBERT HOOVER DIKE CUTOFF WALL

Place of Performance

Location: PALM BEACH, PALM BEACH County, FLORIDA, 33480

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.4 million to TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC. for work described as: IDIQ HERBERT HOOVER DIKE CUTOFF WALL Key points: 1. The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that Trevicos South, Inc. bears the risk of cost overruns. 3. The project duration of 986 days points to a significant, multi-year construction effort. 4. The contract was awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 5. The project is located in Florida, a state prone to hurricanes and flooding. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237990 categorizes this as Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without knowing the total value of the parent IDIQ contract and the scope of work for comparable delivery orders. The awarded amount of $30.4 million for a multi-year heavy civil engineering project appears within a reasonable range for such undertakings, but a detailed cost-benefit analysis would require more granular data on the specific construction activities and materials involved. The firm-fixed-price nature shifts cost risk to the contractor, which can be favorable for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three bids generally provide a basis for price comparison and negotiation, helping to ensure a reasonable price for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a competitive environment, which typically leads to more favorable pricing and better value for the government's investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and infrastructure in the vicinity of the Herbert Hoover Dike, who will receive enhanced flood protection. The services delivered include construction and engineering work related to cutoff walls for flood control. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, specifically around Lake Okeechobee. The project likely involved a workforce of construction laborers, engineers, and project managers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the project's requirements evolve significantly beyond the initial delivery order.
Risk of contractor performance issues impacting the project timeline or quality.
Dependency on the overall performance and management of the parent IDIQ contract.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
The project addresses critical flood control infrastructure, indicating a high priority and essential service.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction sector, which is a significant part of the broader construction industry. This sector is characterized by large-scale infrastructure projects such as dams, highways, and flood control systems. Spending in this sector is often driven by government investment in public works and national security infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within large federal construction programs managed by agencies like the Army Corps of Engineers or the Department of Transportation.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside for this particular award. The prime contractor, Trevicos South, Inc., would have the discretion to subcontract portions of the work, but there is no explicit requirement to prioritize small businesses based on the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the project management team within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight reports or Inspector General involvement would depend on the nature and scale of any issues that arise.

Related Government Programs

Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Programs
Flood Control Projects
Infrastructure Improvement Contracts
Heavy Construction Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen geological conditions arise.
Risk of schedule delays due to weather or supply chain issues.
Contractor performance and quality control are critical for success.
Environmental compliance and permitting can introduce complexities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.4 million to TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC.. IDIQ HERBERT HOOVER DIKE CUTOFF WALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-10. End: 2013-05-23.

What is the track record of Trevicos South, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in heavy civil engineering?

Trevicos South, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, with this delivery order representing a significant award. Analyzing their broader contract portfolio, including past performance on similar projects, is crucial for assessing their capability and reliability. Federal procurement data typically tracks contract awards, modifications, and payment history. A review of Trevicos South's past performance ratings, any past disputes or terminations, and the types of projects they have successfully completed would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record. This specific contract's successful completion within its duration and budget (if known) would be a positive indicator, while any significant issues would raise concerns.

How does the $30.4 million cost compare to similar flood control projects undertaken by the Army Corps of Engineers?

Comparing the $30.4 million cost requires identifying similar flood control projects by the Army Corps of Engineers in terms of scope, complexity, and geographic region. Factors such as the specific type of cutoff wall, the volume of excavation and material, labor costs in the region, and the project duration (986 days) are critical for a meaningful benchmark. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns for comparable projects, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the initial bid reflected the anticipated costs and contractor's profit margin. If the project was completed without significant cost overruns or change orders, it could indicate a well-priced contract relative to its scope.

What are the primary risks associated with the construction of cutoff walls for flood control?

The primary risks associated with constructing cutoff walls for flood control include geological uncertainties, such as encountering unexpected soil conditions or groundwater issues that can increase excavation difficulty and costs. Environmental risks, such as the presence of hazardous materials or the need to protect sensitive ecosystems, can also pose challenges and require specialized mitigation efforts. Furthermore, weather-related delays, particularly in a region like Florida, can impact project timelines and increase costs. Contractor performance risks, including potential delays, quality issues, or safety incidents, are also present. The firm-fixed-price contract shifts some of these cost risks to the contractor, but schedule and performance risks remain.

How effective has the Herbert Hoover Dike been in preventing flooding prior to and after this contract's completion?

Assessing the effectiveness of the Herbert Hoover Dike requires analyzing its performance during significant weather events before and after the completion of this specific cutoff wall project. Data on flood events, water levels in Lake Okeechobee, and any reported breaches or near-breaches would be relevant. The Army Corps of Engineers typically monitors the performance of such infrastructure. Information on whether this contract represented a critical repair or upgrade that demonstrably improved the dike's integrity and flood prevention capabilities would be key. Without specific post-project performance data or incident reports, a definitive statement on effectiveness is speculative.

What has been the historical spending trend for flood control projects managed by the Department of the Army in Florida?

Historical spending on flood control projects by the Department of the Army in Florida can be analyzed through federal procurement databases. This would involve examining contract awards for similar projects over several fiscal years. Trends might indicate an increasing or decreasing investment in flood control infrastructure, potentially influenced by factors like climate change, hurricane activity, and federal budget allocations. Understanding this trend provides context for the $30.4 million award, helping to determine if it aligns with historical spending patterns or represents a significant deviation. It also sheds light on the overall commitment to flood risk management in the region.

Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued for this delivery order, and what was their impact?

The provided data does not detail contract modifications or change orders for this specific delivery order. However, for a project of this duration and complexity, it is not uncommon for modifications to occur due to unforeseen site conditions, design adjustments, or scope changes. Analyzing the number, value, and nature of any modifications is crucial for understanding the final cost and timeline compared to the initial award. Significant modifications could indicate issues with the original scope, pricing, or execution, potentially impacting the overall value for money. Conversely, minor, well-justified modifications might be routine for such projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912EP07R0006

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Trevi Icos Corporation (UEI: 439150632)

Address: 4701 W HILLSBOROUGH AVE, TAMPA, FL, 33614

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,442,013

Exercised Options: $30,442,013

Current Obligation: $30,442,013

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912EP07D0010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline