DoD awards $42.5M contract for Portsmouth seepage barrier, with Treviicos South Inc. as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $42,452,518 ($42.5M)

Contractor: Treviicos South, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-11-26

End Date: 2027-12-31

Contract Duration: 765 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: REPROCUREMENT FOR PORTSMOUTH LPP - SEEPAGE BARRIER PROJECT, PORTSMOUTH, OH.

Place of Performance

Location: PORTSMOUTH, SCIOTO County, OHIO, 45662

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $42.5 million to TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC. for work described as: REPROCUREMENT FOR PORTSMOUTH LPP - SEEPAGE BARRIER PROJECT, PORTSMOUTH, OH. Key points: 1. Contract value of $42.5M for a seepage barrier project in Portsmouth, OH. 2. The contract was awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis. 3. Project duration is estimated at 765 days. 4. The award was made under full and open competition. 5. The prime contractor is Treviicos South, Inc. 6. The project falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $42.5 million for a seepage barrier project appears to be within a reasonable range for large-scale civil engineering construction. However, without specific details on the scope of work, materials, and labor involved, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar projects would require detailed cost breakdowns and project specifications. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor, which can sometimes lead to higher initial bids but provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a competitive environment, which is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving a fair market price. The level of competition can influence the final negotiated price, with more bidders typically leading to more aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value and competitive pricing for the services rendered.

Public Impact

The project will enhance the structural integrity and safety of the Portsmouth facility by installing a seepage barrier. This infrastructure improvement is crucial for the long-term operational viability of the Portsmouth site. The construction activities will likely create temporary employment opportunities in the Portsmouth, Ohio region. The successful completion of the project will ensure continued compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the firm-fixed-price contract.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage complex civil engineering tasks effectively.
Risk of schedule delays due to weather or logistical challenges inherent in large construction projects.

Positive Signals

The firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarding to a single prime contractor streamlines management and accountability.
The project addresses a critical infrastructure need for the Department of Defense facility.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically focusing on specialized infrastructure projects like seepage barriers. This sector is characterized by large-scale projects, significant capital investment, and specialized engineering expertise. The market size for such specialized construction can vary, but projects for federal agencies often represent a substantial portion of the demand, especially for critical infrastructure maintenance and upgrades.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized services or materials. Further investigation into the prime contractor's subcontracting plan would be necessary to fully assess the implications for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) from the Department of the Army, ensuring adherence to contract terms and specifications. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor regarding cost. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, but detailed project progress and financial reporting may be subject to specific contract clauses and agency policies.

Related Government Programs

Army Corps of Engineers Construction Projects
Department of Defense Infrastructure Modernization
Civil Engineering and Construction Contracts
Environmental Remediation and Containment Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Contractor's past performance on similar large-scale civil engineering projects.
Adequacy of environmental protection measures during construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $42.5 million to TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC.. REPROCUREMENT FOR PORTSMOUTH LPP - SEEPAGE BARRIER PROJECT, PORTSMOUTH, OH.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TREVIICOS SOUTH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-26. End: 2027-12-31.

What is the historical performance record of Treviicos South, Inc. with the Department of Defense or similar federal agencies?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to ascertain Treviicos South, Inc.'s historical performance. This would involve examining past contracts awarded to the company, including their value, duration, and type of service. Performance metrics, such as on-time completion rates, adherence to budget, and any documented disputes or contract terminations, would provide crucial insights into their reliability and capability. Understanding their track record with similar civil engineering or construction projects, particularly those involving environmental containment or infrastructure repair, would be particularly relevant for assessing their suitability for this seepage barrier project.

How does the awarded amount of $42.5 million compare to the estimated cost or bids from other competitors?

The provided data indicates that 5 bids were received for this contract. To assess the value for money, a comparison of the awarded amount ($42.5 million) against the bids submitted by the other four competitors is essential. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than the other bids, it suggests a competitive pricing strategy by Treviicos South, Inc. Conversely, if it is the highest bid, further scrutiny into the justification for the award would be warranted. Benchmarking against historical data for similar seepage barrier projects, considering factors like project scale, complexity, and location, would also provide valuable context for evaluating the reasonableness of the price.

What are the specific risks associated with the Portsmouth LPP Seepage Barrier Project, and how are they being mitigated?

Specific risks for this project likely include unforeseen geological conditions at the Portsmouth site, potential environmental hazards during excavation or construction, and the logistical challenges of working in a potentially sensitive area. The firm-fixed-price contract structure inherently mitigates financial risk for the government by capping the total cost. However, the contractor bears the primary risk for cost overruns due to unforeseen conditions. Mitigation strategies would typically involve thorough site investigations prior to construction, robust environmental monitoring protocols, and detailed project management plans developed by the contractor, subject to government oversight.

What is the expected effectiveness of the seepage barrier in achieving its intended purpose for the Portsmouth LPP?

The effectiveness of the seepage barrier will depend on its design specifications, the materials used, and the quality of its installation. As a critical component of the Portsmouth LPP (likely referring to a Landfill or similar containment facility), the barrier is intended to prevent or minimize the migration of contaminants or groundwater into or out of the designated area. Its success will be measured by its ability to maintain structural integrity over its intended lifespan and to meet or exceed the performance standards set forth in the contract, which would likely be verified through post-construction testing and ongoing monitoring.

What has been the historical spending trend for similar civil engineering construction projects by the Department of the Army in Ohio?

Analyzing historical spending for similar civil engineering construction projects by the Department of the Army in Ohio would require accessing and aggregating data from federal procurement databases over a relevant period. This analysis would involve identifying contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 237990) and project types (e.g., environmental containment, heavy civil construction) awarded within Ohio. Trends in contract values, number of bidders, and competition levels could then be identified. This historical context would help determine if the $42.5 million award for the Portsmouth seepage barrier is consistent with past spending patterns or represents an outlier.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W9123720R0008

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 38 3RD AVE FL 3, CHARLESTOWN, MA, 02129

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,452,518

Exercised Options: $42,452,518

Current Obligation: $42,452,518

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline