DoD Awards $147M for Electronics & Communication Equipment Engineering to Jorge Scientific Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $144,778,355 ($144.8M)

Contractor: Imperatis Corp.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-05-26

End Date: 2009-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,586 days

Daily Burn Rate: $91.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200512!501291!2100!W911QX!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W911QX05D0009 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20070525!147248306!147248306!147248306!N!JORGE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION !2900 S QUINCY ST STE 400 !ARLINGTON !VA!22206!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000001300000!N!N!000000000000!AC65!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ENG/MANUF DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!999!E! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!Y!N!D! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $144.8 million to IMPERATIS CORP. for work described as: 200512!501291!2100!W911QX!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W911QX05D0009 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20070525!147248306!147248306!147248306!N!JORGE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION !2900 S QUINCY ST STE 400 !ARLINGTON !VA!22206!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering and manufacturing development of electronics and communication equipment. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The primary contractor is Jorge Scientific Corporation, with Imperatis Corp. as a competitor. 4. The sector is primarily Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDTE).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $147.2 million over approximately 4 years appears reasonable for specialized engineering services in the defense sector. Benchmarking against similar RDTE contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. The presence of a competitor (IMPERATIS CORP.) further supports competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process likely ensures taxpayer funds are used efficiently for the required engineering services.

Public Impact

Enhances national defense capabilities through advanced electronics and communication systems. Supports technological innovation in the defense sector. Potential for job creation in engineering and manufacturing fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration is relatively long, potentially leading to scope creep or evolving requirements.
Cost-plus contracts can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Clear statement of work for engineering and development.
Contract supports critical defense technology.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on RDTE for electronics and communication equipment. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority but can be subject to rapid obsolescence and evolving threats.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific subcontracting goals or participation by small businesses in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the USA Materiel Command Acquisition, indicating established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring of performance and costs.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to the CPFF structure.
Risk of technological obsolescence during the contract's long duration.
Dependency on a single prime contractor for critical development.
Lack of explicit small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $144.8 million to IMPERATIS CORP.. 200512!501291!2100!W911QX!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!W911QX05D0009 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20050526!20070525!147248306!147248306!147248306!N!JORGE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION !2900 S QUINCY ST STE 400 !ARLINGTON !VA!22206!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000001300000!N!N!000000000000!AC65!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ENG/MANUF DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IMPERATIS CORP..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $144.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-26. End: 2009-09-28.

What specific technological advancements are expected from this contract, and how do they align with current defense modernization priorities?

This contract aims to develop and manufacture advanced electronics and communication equipment. The specific advancements are not detailed, but they are expected to enhance the capabilities of military forces. Alignment with defense modernization priorities would depend on the specific technologies being developed, such as secure communication systems, advanced sensor integration, or electronic warfare capabilities.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract, and how is contractor performance being tracked?

Key performance indicators for such a contract would typically include meeting technical specifications, adhering to development timelines, and managing costs within the contract's framework. Performance is usually tracked through regular progress reports, technical reviews, and site visits by contracting officers and technical representatives to ensure the contractor is meeting all contractual obligations.

How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure mitigate risks for both the government and the contractor in this R&D-intensive project?

The Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) structure allows the government to reimburse the contractor for allowable costs incurred while performing the work, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This mitigates risk for the contractor by ensuring they are compensated for their efforts and expenses, even if the project encounters unforeseen technical challenges. For the government, the fixed fee provides some cost certainty on the profit margin, though total costs can still fluctuate based on actual expenses.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2900 S QUINCY ST STE 400, ARLINGTON, VA, 22206

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911QX05D0009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline