DoD's $78M GRD Strategic Logistics Distribution System Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $78,138,268 ($78.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-09-26

End Date: 2008-09-20

Contract Duration: 360 days

Daily Burn Rate: $217.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW07D4040} GRD STRATEGIC LOGISTICS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $78.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW07D4040} GRD STRATEGIC LOGISTICS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $78.1 million, was awarded by the Department of the Army. 2. Awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', the contract aims to provide administrative management and general management consulting services. 3. The contract duration is 360 days, with a significant portion of the funding allocated. 4. The use of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' warrants further investigation into the competitive landscape and potential risks. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which typically offers cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $78.1 million for a 360-day duration appears high for administrative management and general management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for this NAICS code is crucial to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad solicitation. However, the specific awardees being 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about the effectiveness of the competition in securing the best value and potential risks associated with foreign contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: The significant expenditure of $78.1 million necessitates scrutiny to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and effectively, especially given the nature of the awardees.

Public Impact

Logistics and distribution services are critical for military operations, impacting readiness and efficiency. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' could raise concerns about national security, data protection, and economic impact. Transparency in the selection process for foreign contractors is essential for public trust. The contract's focus on administrative and management consulting suggests potential for process improvements or strategic guidance within the Army's logistics.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'
  • High contract value for a 1-year duration
  • Lack of specific awardee details

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific needs of government agencies. Benchmarks are difficult without more specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or awards made to small businesses under this contract. The awardees are listed as 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', suggesting a lack of small business participation or reporting in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for contracts involving foreign awardees and significant funding. The Department of the Army and potentially other oversight bodies should ensure rigorous monitoring of performance, compliance, and security protocols.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'
  • Lack of specific details on services provided
  • High contract value relative to duration
  • Potential national security implications
  • Unclear economic benefit to domestic industry

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $78.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW07D4040} GRD STRATEGIC LOGISTICS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $78.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-26. End: 2008-09-20.

What specific services are included under the GRD Strategic Logistics Distribution System contract, and how do they align with the $78.1 million value?

The contract is categorized under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). While the exact services are not detailed, this typically includes areas like organizational planning, efficiency studies, and management consulting. The high value suggests complex or extensive logistical support and strategic advisory roles are anticipated, potentially involving multiple foreign entities or specialized expertise.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a significant contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' for critical logistics support?

Risks include national security vulnerabilities, data security breaches, potential for fraud or corruption, challenges in enforcing contract terms, and difficulties in oversight due to geographical and jurisdictional complexities. There may also be concerns regarding the economic benefit to domestic businesses and potential reliance on foreign entities for critical infrastructure.

How effectively did the 'Full and Open Competition' process identify and secure the best value for the government, given the awardees are 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'?

While 'Full and Open Competition' theoretically maximizes opportunities, the outcome of awarding to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about whether the process truly yielded the best value or if there were limitations in domestic or allied participation. Further analysis is needed to understand the evaluation criteria and the specific capabilities offered by these foreign entities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $78,138,268

Exercised Options: $78,138,268

Current Obligation: $78,138,268

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91GDW07D4040

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-09-26

Current End Date: 2008-09-20

Potential End Date: 2008-09-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-13

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending