DoD Awards $19.2M for Fort Stewart Training Center Construction to IAP-Design Build, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,216,800 ($19.2M)
Contractor: Iap-Design Build, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-12
End Date: 2013-10-07
Contract Duration: 756 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BATTLE COMMAND TRAINING CENTER, FORT STEWART, GA. PN 39614
Place of Performance
Location: FORT STEWART, LIBERTY County, GEORGIA, 31314
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.2 million to IAP-DESIGN BUILD, LLC for work described as: BATTLE COMMAND TRAINING CENTER, FORT STEWART, GA. PN 39614 Key points: 1. Construction project for a military training center. 2. Awarded via full and open competition. 3. Potential for cost savings through fixed-price contract. 4. Located in Georgia, a state with significant defense presence.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $19.2M appears reasonable for a construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received fair value for the funds expended on this construction project.
Public Impact
Enhances military readiness and training capabilities at Fort Stewart. Supports local economy through construction jobs and related services. Provides modern facilities for critical command and control training.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts if scope changes.
- Construction delays can impact training schedules.
- Geographic concentration of work in Georgia.
Positive Signals
- Clear project scope defined by the delivery order.
- Competitive bidding process likely secured favorable pricing.
- Fixed-price contract incentivizes contractor efficiency.
Sector Analysis
This project falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Defense construction spending is a significant component of this sector, often involving large-scale, specialized facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated requirement or outcome for this specific contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were subcontracted.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army, as the procuring agency, is responsible for oversight. The fixed-price contract structure provides some accountability for project completion within budget.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded after exclusion of sources.
- Long project duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting.
- Potential for scope creep impacting fixed-price contract.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.2 million to IAP-DESIGN BUILD, LLC. BATTLE COMMAND TRAINING CENTER, FORT STEWART, GA. PN 39614
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is IAP-DESIGN BUILD, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-12. End: 2013-10-07.
What was the basis for excluding other sources if the competition was 'full and open after exclusion of sources'?
The phrase 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' typically implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources were initially excluded based on certain criteria (e.g., pre-qualification, specific capabilities). However, the subsequent 'full and open' aspect suggests that after this initial filtering, the remaining pool was competed openly. The exact reasons for exclusion would need to be detailed in the contract's justification and approval documents.
How does the $19.2M cost compare to similar military training center construction projects?
Benchmarking this $19.2M award against similar Department of Defense training center construction projects requires access to a database of comparable contracts. Factors like facility size, complexity, location, and specific training capabilities (e.g., simulation technology) significantly influence cost. Without specific project details and comparative data, a precise cost-effectiveness assessment is challenging.
What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a construction project of this duration?
Firm fixed-price contracts place the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. For a project spanning over two years, risks include unforeseen material price increases, labor shortages, or unexpected site conditions that could lead to contractor claims or project delays if not managed meticulously. The government's risk is primarily related to potential contractor default or disputes over scope changes.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN09R0056
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Innovative Architectural Planners, Inc. (UEI: 138785501)
Address: 2740 AIRPORT DR STE 300, COLUMBUS, OH, 43219
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,216,800
Exercised Options: $19,216,800
Current Obligation: $19,216,800
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN10D0062
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-12
Current End Date: 2013-10-07
Potential End Date: 2013-10-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-02-11
More Contracts from Iap-Design Build, LLC
- Dfac Conversions and BN HQ Expansions — $22.1M (Department of Defense)
- Dfac Conversions and BN HQ Expansions — $22.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)