Department of Defense awarded $60.2M R&D contract to Frontier Technology Inc. for specialized research
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $60,220,680 ($60.2M)
Contractor: Frontier Technology Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-09-27
End Date: 2019-12-29
Contract Duration: 1,188 days
Daily Burn Rate: $50.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF SATISFIES THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE.
Place of Performance
Location: GOLETA, SANTA BARBARA County, CALIFORNIA, 93117
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $60.2 million to FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF SATISFIES THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in advanced research capabilities. 2. Frontier Technology Inc. secured this award through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration of nearly three years suggests a complex and ongoing research effort. 4. The specific NAICS code indicates a focus on physical, engineering, and life sciences research. 5. The contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) allows for flexibility in research scope while managing costs. 6. This award falls within the broader category of Defense research and development spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $60.2 million for a nearly three-year research and development effort appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts within the Department of Defense for advanced physical and engineering sciences would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed fee component suggests a degree of cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive better pricing and innovation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open nature of the competition suggests a robust market response.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more cost-effective solutions and prevent price gouging.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Defense and its research arms, seeking advancements in physical, engineering, and life sciences. The services delivered involve specialized research and development, contributing to national security and technological superiority. The geographic impact is centered in California, where Frontier Technology Inc. is located, potentially creating local economic benefits. Workforce implications include the employment of scientists, engineers, and support staff involved in the research activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not closely monitored.
- The specialized nature of the research may limit the number of truly competitive bidders in future solicitations.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a specific research area could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a healthy market and fair pricing.
- The fixed fee component provides a level of cost certainty for the government.
- The contract duration indicates a commitment to a specific research objective, allowing for sustained progress.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically NAICS code 541712, which covers R&D in the physical, engineering, and life sciences (except biotechnology). This is a critical area for defense modernization, involving innovation in materials, systems, and technologies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other DoD R&D contracts awarded to private firms for similar scientific disciplines.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary focus is on the capabilities of the prime contractor, Frontier Technology Inc.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program executive office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be tied to the achievement of research milestones and deliverables outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific research details may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Research and Development Programs
- Advanced Technology Development Contracts
- Physical Sciences Research
- Engineering Research Services
- Life Sciences Research Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF Contract)
- Performance Dependency
- Limited Competition in Future Solicitations (due to specialization)
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, research-and-development, frontier-technology-inc, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, california, naics-541712, advanced-technology, scientific-research
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $60.2 million to FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC. IGF::OT::IGF SATISFIES THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $60.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-09-27. End: 2019-12-29.
What is Frontier Technology Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar R&D contracts?
Frontier Technology Inc. has a history of performing work for the Department of Defense. While specific details on past R&D contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their ability to secure a $60.2 million award through full and open competition suggests a demonstrated capability and a positive performance history. Further analysis would involve reviewing their contract award history, past performance evaluations, and any documented successes or challenges on previous DoD engagements to fully assess their reliability and expertise in the specified research domain.
How does the $60.2 million contract value compare to similar R&D efforts within the Department of Defense?
The $60.2 million contract value for a nearly three-year R&D effort in physical, engineering, and life sciences is substantial. To benchmark this value, one would compare it against other contracts awarded by the DoD for similar research areas, such as advanced materials, propulsion systems, or sensor development. Factors like the novelty of the research, the required expertise, and the project's scope significantly influence R&D contract values. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a premium or a standard rate, but the full and open competition suggests the pricing was deemed fair in the market.
What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure for the government?
The primary risk for the government with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the 'fixed fee' component provides a ceiling on the contractor's profit, the 'cost plus' element means the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs incurred. If the research proves more complex or expensive than initially anticipated, the total cost to the government could exceed initial projections. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and clear definition of allowable costs are crucial to mitigate this risk and ensure the government receives good value.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach likely to be in ensuring optimal outcomes for this R&D contract?
Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring optimal outcomes in government contracting, including R&D. It maximizes the pool of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that can drive innovation, improve quality, and secure competitive pricing. For this R&D contract, it means the Department of Defense likely received proposals from multiple highly qualified firms, allowing them to select the one offering the best combination of technical approach, past performance, and price. This approach increases the likelihood of achieving the research objectives efficiently and effectively.
What is the historical spending pattern for NAICS code 541712 within the Department of Defense over the last five years?
Analyzing the historical spending patterns for NAICS code 541712 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences) within the Department of Defense over the last five years would reveal trends in investment in these critical research areas. This data would show whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and identify major agencies or branches within the DoD that are the largest purchasers of these services. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the $60.2 million award to Frontier Technology Inc. and indicate the overall strategic importance the DoD places on this type of R&D.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 55 CASTILIAN DR STE 123, GOLETA, CA, 93117
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $60,220,680
Exercised Options: $60,220,680
Current Obligation: $60,220,680
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W15QKN16D0109
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-09-27
Current End Date: 2019-12-29
Potential End Date: 2019-12-29 12:12:00
Last Modified: 2022-05-04
More Contracts from Frontier Technology Inc
- This IS a Sbir III Contract in Support of the DOD, Stemming From Previous Sbir Phase I & II Topics Including AF06-016, MDA09-021, N05-039, N07-010, A06-035 and Osd07-Cr4. PSC Code AC62 Ended PER PSC Manual Effective OCT 2020. Replacing With PSC AC32 — $267.7M (General Services Administration)
- Life Cycle Decision Support Analysis Tools — $180.7M (Department of Defense)
- Usaf Space and Missile Center (SMC) Engineering Directorate (EN) Systems Engineering and Life Cycle Decision Support Award — $50.2M (General Services Administration)
- Cyber/O1d RED Team Support Services to Support Cotf RED Team Status — $35.6M (Department of Defense)
- - Sbir Phase III Award in Support HQ AF A1 Technical Innovation Support Project — $33.7M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)