DoD's JPATS GBTS CLS Follow-On Contract Awarded for $87.3M to FlightSafety Defense Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $87,337,197 ($87.3M)

Contractor: Flightsafety Defense Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-06-06

End Date: 2007-12-31

Contract Duration: 208 days

Daily Burn Rate: $419.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: JPATS GROUND BASED TRAINING SYSTEM (GBTS) CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT (CLS) FOLLOW-ON

Place of Performance

Location: ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE County, COLORADO, 80112

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $87.3 million to FLIGHTSAFETY DEFENSE CORPORATION for work described as: JPATS GROUND BASED TRAINING SYSTEM (GBTS) CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT (CLS) FOLLOW-ON Key points: 1. The contract is for contractor logistics support for the JPATS Ground Based Training System. 2. FlightSafety Defense Corporation is the sole awardee, indicating a specific capability or existing relationship. 3. The contract value is substantial at $87.3 million, requiring careful oversight. 4. This falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $87.3M for logistics support appears significant. Benchmarking against similar logistics support contracts for training systems would be necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the specific award type 'Delivery Order' implies it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, which could have implications for price discovery if not managed effectively.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for essential training system support. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient service delivery is crucial for maximizing the value of this expenditure.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness for JPATS training. Supports critical training infrastructure for pilots. Potential for long-term contractor relationship impacting future training system support costs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for vendor lock-in if this is a sole-source follow-on.
  • Need to verify if 'full and open' truly resulted in competitive pricing.
  • Long-term sustainment costs could escalate without strong oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical military training.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
  • Established contract vehicle for training system support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on training systems and associated logistics. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly dependent on the complexity and technology of the training system.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific subcontracting goals for small businesses on this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial to ensure FlightSafety Defense Corporation meets performance requirements and that the pricing remains competitive throughout the contract duration, especially given the logistics support nature.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns in long-term sustainment.
  • Limited visibility into the true competitiveness of the 'full and open' award.
  • Risk of vendor lock-in for specialized training system support.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical training infrastructure.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, co, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $87.3 million to FLIGHTSAFETY DEFENSE CORPORATION. JPATS GROUND BASED TRAINING SYSTEM (GBTS) CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT (CLS) FOLLOW-ON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FLIGHTSAFETY DEFENSE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $87.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-06-06. End: 2007-12-31.

What was the competitive landscape during the 'full and open' bidding process, and how did it influence the final price?

While the contract states 'full and open competition,' the nature of specialized training systems and logistics support can sometimes limit the number of truly capable bidders. Understanding the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria used is key to assessing if effective price discovery was achieved. Without this, it's difficult to definitively say if the $87.3M represents optimal value.

What are the long-term sustainment costs associated with this contract, and are there plans for future competition?

Logistics support contracts often have significant long-term sustainment costs. It's important to analyze the total projected cost over the system's lifecycle. If this contract is a precursor to further sole-source extensions or if future competition is limited due to proprietary technology or specialized knowledge, taxpayers could face higher costs over time. Proactive planning for future competitive procurements is essential.

How does the performance of FlightSafety Defense Corporation on this contract align with industry benchmarks for similar training system logistics?

Assessing performance against industry benchmarks requires access to key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) defined in the contract. Metrics such as system uptime, response times for maintenance, and training effectiveness directly attributable to the support system are crucial. Comparing these against established standards will reveal the true effectiveness and value delivered by the contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (UEI: 001024314)

Address: 10770 E BRIARWOOD AVE # 100, CENTENNIAL, CO, 80112

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $87,442,953

Exercised Options: $87,397,467

Current Obligation: $87,337,197

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA861707D6172

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-06-06

Current End Date: 2007-12-31

Potential End Date: 2008-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-07-31

More Contracts from Flightsafety Defense Corporation

View all Flightsafety Defense Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending