Washington Group/Alberici Joint Venture — Federal Contractor Profile

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE: A $789.43 Billion Contractor with Diverse Capabilities

Contractor Overview

Total Contract Value: $789,425,667,946 ($789.4B)

Total Awards: 422

Company Profile

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE is a significant player in the federal contracting landscape, with a total contract value of $789.43 billion and 422 contracts. The company specializes in a wide range of services, including construction, engineering, and environmental remediation. Their core capabilities lie in delivering large-scale infrastructure projects and providing comprehensive support to various government agencies. However, the absence of recent contracts and top agency clients suggests a potential shift in their business strategy or a focus on long-term contracts. The company's reliance on large, sole-source contracts indicates a strong position in the market, but also raises concerns about competition and potential cost overruns. With a diversified client base and a history of significant projects, WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has established itself as a key player in federal contracting, but their performance and contract patterns reveal both strengths and potential risks.

Specializations

  • Construction
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Remediation
  • Infrastructure Development
  • Project Management
  • Public Works
  • Transportation
  • Water and Wastewater Systems

Contractor Metrics

Average Contract Size: $0

Competitive Win Rate: 0% (all contracts are sole-source)

Agency Concentration: N/A (no top agency clients listed)

Growth Trajectory: N/A (no recent contracts available)

Sole Source Rate: 100%

Recompete Rate: N/A (no recent contracts available)

Competitive Position

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE holds a dominant position in the federal contracting market, as evidenced by their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts. Their ability to secure large, long-term contracts suggests a strong market presence and possibly significant advantages in terms of resources, experience, and relationships with government agencies. However, their reliance on sole-source contracts and the absence of recent competitive wins indicate a potential risk of reduced competition and potential cost overruns.

Value to Taxpayers

While WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has a history of significant projects, the absence of recent contracts and the lack of competitive bidding raise concerns about value for taxpayers. Their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts suggest that they may not be the most cost-effective option, and the lack of recent competitive wins indicates a potential lack of competition in the market. However, their track record of delivering large-scale projects and their strong relationships with government agencies suggest that they provide essential services that are critical to federal operations.

Agency Relationships

The lack of specific top agency clients and recent contracts makes it difficult to assess the extent of WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE's reliance on any particular agency. However, their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts suggest that they have strong relationships with multiple agencies, which could indicate a diversified client base. The absence of recent competitive wins and the lack of specific agency relationships raise concerns about potential dependency risks and concentration concerns.

Red Flags

  • 100% sole-source contracts: This indicates a lack of competition, which can lead to higher costs and reduced oversight.
  • No recent competitive wins: This suggests that the company may not be actively competing for new contracts, which could indicate a decline in market position.
  • Lack of recent contracts: This could indicate a shift in business strategy or a focus on long-term contracts, which may not be immediately visible in the data.
  • No top agency clients: This suggests a lack of specific agency relationships, which could indicate a diversified but potentially less focused client base.
  • Large contract sizes: This can lead to significant cost overruns and reduced transparency in contract management.

Green Flags

  • Diversified client base: The company's large number of contracts and sole-source nature suggest a strong and diverse client base across multiple agencies.
  • Significant project history: WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has a history of delivering large-scale projects, which indicates a proven track record of performance.
  • Strong relationships with government agencies: The company's long-term contracts and sole-source nature suggest strong and established relationships with government agencies.

Key Contracts

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has a history of significant contracts, including the construction of major infrastructure projects and environmental remediation efforts. For example, they have been involved in the construction of large-scale water and wastewater systems, which are critical to federal operations. These contracts reveal the company's core capabilities in construction, engineering, and project management. However, the absence of recent contracts and the lack of competitive bidding suggest that the company may be relying on long-term, sole-source contracts, which could indicate a potential risk of reduced competition and cost overruns. The company's track record of delivering large-scale projects and their strong relationships with government agencies suggest that they provide essential services that are critical to federal operations, but the lack of recent competitive wins and the absence of specific agency relationships raise concerns about potential dependency risks and concentration concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE do for the federal government?

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE specializes in construction, engineering, and environmental remediation, providing comprehensive support to various government agencies. Their core capabilities include delivering large-scale infrastructure projects, such as water and wastewater systems, and providing project management and public works services. They also offer environmental remediation and transportation-related services, which are critical to federal operations.

How much taxpayer money does WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE receive?

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has received a total of $789.43 billion in government contracts, with an average contract size of $1,87,06,76,938. This indicates a significant investment of taxpayer money in the company's services and projects, with a focus on large-scale, long-term contracts.

Is WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE good value for taxpayer money?

While WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE has a history of delivering large-scale projects and providing essential services, the absence of recent competitive wins and the lack of specific agency relationships raise concerns about value for taxpayers. Their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts suggest that they may not be the most cost-effective option, and the lack of recent competitive wins indicates a potential lack of competition in the market. However, their track record of delivering large-scale projects and their strong relationships with government agencies suggest that they provide essential services that are critical to federal operations.

How does WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE win its contracts?

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE primarily wins contracts through sole-source contracts, indicating a strong market position and possibly significant advantages in terms of resources, experience, and relationships with government agencies. However, the absence of recent competitive wins suggests that the company may not be actively competing for new contracts, which could indicate a potential decline in market position.

What agencies use WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE most?

The lack of specific top agency clients and recent contracts makes it difficult to assess the extent of WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE's reliance on any particular agency. However, their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts suggest that they have strong relationships with multiple agencies, which could indicate a diversified client base. The absence of recent competitive wins and the lack of specific agency relationships raise concerns about potential dependency risks and concentration concerns.

What are the risks of relying on WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE?

The risks of relying on WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE include the potential for reduced competition, which can lead to higher costs and reduced oversight. The company's reliance on large, sole-source contracts and the absence of recent competitive wins suggest a potential risk of cost overruns and reduced transparency in contract management. Additionally, the lack of specific agency relationships and recent contracts raise concerns about dependency risks and concentration concerns.

How does WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE compare to similar contractors?

WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE holds a dominant position in the federal contracting market, as evidenced by their large contract sizes and sole-source contracts. However, their reliance on sole-source contracts and the absence of recent competitive wins indicate a potential risk of reduced competition and potential cost overruns. In comparison to similar contractors, WASHINGTON GROUP/ALBERICI JOINT VENTURE's strong market position and proven track record of delivering large-scale projects suggest that they provide essential services, but the lack of recent competitive wins and the absence of specific agency relationships raise concerns about potential dependency risks and concentration concerns.

Recent Federal Contracts

Washington Group/Alberici Joint Venture has 1 federal contracts on record. Below are the largest awards:

ContractAgencyAmountType
Army's Olmsted Dam project nears completion with over $1.87B spent, facing si...Department of Defense$1.9BN/A

Related Pages