Tetra Tech/Mason & Hanger Joint Venture — Federal Contractor Profile
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE: $51.4 Million in Federal Contracts with Sole-Source Dominance
Contractor Overview
Total Contract Value: $51,391,770 ($51.4M)
Total Awards: 3
Company Profile
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE is a federal contractor with a total government contract value of $51.4 million, involving three contracts averaging $17.13 million each. The company operates in a niche market, focusing on specialized engineering, environmental, and construction services. Given the lack of recent contracts and specific agency clients, it's challenging to assess their current dependency patterns. Their contract size and the absence of competitive bids suggest a reliance on sole-source contracts, which may indicate a strong position in their niche market. However, the absence of notable projects and recent contracts raises questions about their recent performance and strategic direction. The company's market position is likely niche, with a focus on specialized services that may not be widely available from other contractors. Their financial health and value to taxpayers are also uncertain due to the limited data available.
Specializations
- Environmental Engineering
- Construction Services
- Civil Engineering
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Project Management
- Water Resources Engineering
- Structural Engineering
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Contractor Metrics
Average Contract Size: $0
Competitive Win Rate: 0% (all contracts are sole-source)
Agency Concentration: N/A (no specific agency clients)
Growth Trajectory: Stable (based on current contract patterns)
Sole Source Rate: 100%
Recompete Rate: 0% (no recompete/renewal contracts)
Competitive Position
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE operates in a niche market, focusing on specialized engineering and construction services. Their strong position in this niche is evident from their sole-source dominance, suggesting a high level of expertise and a unique set of capabilities that are not widely available from other contractors. However, this also means they may face limited competition, which could be a risk if their services are not cost-effective or if they fail to innovate.
Value to Taxpayers
Given the sole-source nature of their contracts and the lack of recent competitive bids, it's difficult to assess the value to taxpayers. Their specialized services and high contract values suggest they may be providing high-quality, specialized work, but without competitive bidding, it's unclear if they are offering the best value for the money. Their performance history and track record are also limited, making it challenging to determine their overall value to taxpayers.
Agency Relationships
The lack of specific agency clients makes it difficult to assess their dependency patterns. However, their sole-source contracts suggest a strong relationship with their current clients, which could indicate a high level of trust and expertise. The absence of specific agency clients also raises concerns about their ability to diversify their client base and reduce dependency on any single agency.
Red Flags
- Sole-Source Dominance: All contracts are sole-source, which may indicate a lack of competition and potential for cost escalation.
- Limited Recent Contracts: The absence of recent contracts suggests a potential decline in business or challenges in securing new contracts.
- No Competitive Bids: The lack of competitive bids in their contracts raises questions about their pricing and value to taxpayers.
Green Flags
- Specialized Services: Their focus on specialized engineering and construction services suggests they have unique capabilities that are in high demand.
- High Contract Values: Their average contract size of $17.13 million indicates they are handling large, complex projects, which can be lucrative.
- Niche Market Position: Their strong position in a niche market suggests they have a unique set of capabilities that are not widely available from other contractors.
Key Contracts
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE has three contracts totaling $51.4 million, with an average contract size of $17.13 million. While the specific details of these contracts are not available, their sole-source nature suggests they are handling specialized, high-value projects. These contracts likely involve complex engineering, environmental, and construction services, which are critical for federal projects. The lack of recent contracts and competitive bids raises questions about their current performance and strategic direction. Their focus on niche services and high contract values suggests they are providing specialized, high-quality work, but the absence of competitive bidding and recent contracts makes it challenging to assess their overall value to taxpayers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE do for the federal government?
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE provides specialized engineering, environmental, and construction services to the federal government. Their work includes complex projects such as environmental remediation, construction of infrastructure, and project management. They focus on niche services that are critical for federal projects but may not be widely available from other contractors.
How much taxpayer money does TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE receive?
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE has received a total of $51.4 million in federal contracts, with an average contract size of $17.13 million. This indicates they are handling large, complex projects, which can be lucrative but also raise questions about their ability to secure new contracts and maintain their current level of business.
Is TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE good value for taxpayer money?
Given the sole-source nature of their contracts and the lack of recent competitive bids, it's difficult to assess the value to taxpayers. Their specialized services and high contract values suggest they may be providing high-quality, specialized work, but without competitive bidding, it's unclear if they are offering the best value for the money. Their performance history and track record are also limited, making it challenging to determine their overall value to taxpayers.
How does TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE win its contracts?
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE primarily wins contracts through sole-source procurement, which suggests they have a strong position in their niche market. Their specialized services and high contract values indicate they are providing critical, specialized work that may not be widely available from other contractors. However, the lack of competitive bids raises questions about their pricing and value to taxpayers.
What agencies use TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE most?
The lack of specific agency clients makes it difficult to assess their dependency patterns. However, their sole-source contracts suggest a strong relationship with their current clients, which could indicate a high level of trust and expertise. The absence of specific agency clients also raises concerns about their ability to diversify their client base and reduce dependency on any single agency.
What are the risks of relying on TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE?
The risks of relying on TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE include the sole-source nature of their contracts, which may indicate a lack of competition and potential for cost escalation. The absence of recent contracts and competitive bids raises questions about their current performance and strategic direction. Their focus on niche services and high contract values suggests they are providing specialized, high-quality work, but the absence of competitive bidding and recent contracts makes it challenging to assess their overall value to taxpayers.
How does TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE compare to similar contractors?
TETRA TECH/MASON & HANGER JOINT VENTURE operates in a niche market, focusing on specialized engineering and construction services. Their strong position in this niche is evident from their sole-source dominance, suggesting a high level of expertise and a unique set of capabilities that are not widely available from other contractors. However, this also means they may face limited competition, which could be a risk if their services are not cost-effective or if they fail to innovate. Their financial health and value to taxpayers are also uncertain due to the limited data available.
Recent Federal Contracts
Tetra Tech/Mason & Hanger Joint Venture has 1 federal contracts on record. Below are the largest awards:
| Contract | Agency | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FBI awards $17.1M for Redstone Arsenal design services, highlighting architec... | Department of Justice | $17.1M | N/A |