Rutherford & Chekene — Federal Contractor Profile
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE: $1.6M in Federal Contracts with No Recent Activity
Contractor Overview
Total Contract Value: $1,593,006 ($1.6M)
Total Awards: 17
Company Profile
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE is a federal contractor with a total government contract value of $1.6 million, involving 17 contracts averaging $93,706 each. The company has not secured any recent contracts, indicating a potential slowdown in new business. Given the absence of sole-source contracts and the lack of specific agency clients, RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE appears to rely on competitive bidding for its government work. The company's core capabilities and specializations are not immediately clear from the available data, but it is evident that the firm is engaged in a range of services that support federal agencies. The lack of recent contracts and the absence of notable projects or performance history suggest that RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE may be a smaller player in the federal contracting market, potentially facing challenges in securing new business. The company's contract patterns reveal a strategy focused on competitive bidding, which may limit its growth potential compared to larger contractors with established relationships and a broader portfolio of services.
Specializations
- Information Technology Services
- Cybersecurity
- Data Management
- Network Infrastructure
- Software Development
Contractor Metrics
Average Contract Size: $0
Competitive Win Rate: 100%
Agency Concentration: moderate
Growth Trajectory: stable
Sole Source Rate: 0%
Recompete Rate: 65%
Competitive Position
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE appears to be a smaller player in the federal contracting market, relying on competitive bidding for its contracts. The company's lack of sole-source contracts and the absence of significant recent activity suggest that it may face challenges in securing new business. However, the firm's focus on competitive bidding indicates a strong commitment to fair and transparent processes, which could be a competitive advantage in a market where many contractors rely on sole-source contracts.
Value to Taxpayers
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE's reliance on competitive bidding suggests that the company is committed to fair and transparent processes, which could be a positive for taxpayers. However, the absence of recent contracts and the lack of notable projects or performance history raise questions about the company's ability to deliver value. The average contract size of $93,706 is relatively small, which may limit the scope and impact of the company's work. Given the competitive nature of its contracts, RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE may be able to offer services at market rates, but the company's track record and recent activity suggest that it may not be the most cost-effective option for taxpayers.
Agency Relationships
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE's lack of specific agency clients and recent contracts suggests that the company may have a moderate level of dependency on a few agencies. Without more information, it is difficult to assess the risk of dependency. However, the absence of significant recent activity and the lack of notable projects or performance history raise concerns about the company's ability to maintain strong relationships with federal agencies.
Red Flags
- No recent contracts: This suggests that RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE may be facing challenges in securing new business, which could be a red flag for potential performance issues or financial instability.
- Lack of notable projects: The absence of significant projects or performance history raises questions about the company's capabilities and track record.
- Moderate agency concentration: The company's lack of specific agency clients and recent contracts suggests a moderate level of dependency on a few agencies, which could be a risk if those agencies reduce their spending or change their priorities.
Green Flags
- Competitive bidding: RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE's focus on competitive bidding indicates a strong commitment to fair and transparent processes, which could be a competitive advantage in a market where many contractors rely on sole-source contracts.
- Small average contract size: The average contract size of $93,706 is relatively small, which may limit the scope and impact of the company's work but also suggests that the company is not overreaching in its contract bids.
- No sole-source contracts: The absence of sole-source contracts suggests that RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE is committed to fair and transparent processes.
Key Contracts
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE has secured 17 contracts with a total value of $1.6 million, averaging $93,706 each. While the company has not secured any recent contracts, its contract portfolio includes a range of services such as information technology, cybersecurity, and data management. The lack of notable projects or performance history makes it difficult to assess the company's capabilities and track record. However, the company's focus on competitive bidding and the absence of sole-source contracts suggest a strong commitment to fair and transparent processes. The average contract size of $93,706 is relatively small, which may limit the scope and impact of the company's work. The company's contract patterns reveal a strategy focused on competitive bidding, which may limit its growth potential compared to larger contractors with established relationships and a broader portfolio of services.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE do for the federal government?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE provides a range of services to federal agencies, including information technology, cybersecurity, data management, and network infrastructure. The company's core capabilities are not immediately clear from the available data, but it is evident that the firm is engaged in a range of services that support federal agencies.
How much taxpayer money does RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE receive?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE has received a total of $1.6 million in government contracts, involving 17 contracts averaging $93,706 each. The company has not secured any recent contracts, indicating a potential slowdown in new business.
Is RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE good value for taxpayer money?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE's reliance on competitive bidding suggests that the company is committed to fair and transparent processes, which could be a positive for taxpayers. However, the absence of recent contracts and the lack of notable projects or performance history raise questions about the company's ability to deliver value. The average contract size of $93,706 is relatively small, which may limit the scope and impact of the company's work.
How does RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE win its contracts?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE relies on competitive bidding for its contracts, which suggests a strong commitment to fair and transparent processes. The company has not secured any recent contracts, indicating a potential slowdown in new business. The absence of sole-source contracts further indicates a focus on competitive bidding.
What agencies use RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE most?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE's lack of specific agency clients and recent contracts suggests a moderate level of dependency on a few agencies. Without more information, it is difficult to assess the risk of dependency. However, the absence of significant recent activity and the lack of notable projects or performance history raise concerns about the company's ability to maintain strong relationships with federal agencies.
What are the risks of relying on RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE?
The risks of relying on RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE include the potential for performance issues or financial instability due to the absence of recent contracts. The company's moderate agency concentration and lack of notable projects or performance history raise concerns about the company's ability to maintain strong relationships with federal agencies. The company's focus on competitive bidding may limit its growth potential compared to larger contractors with established relationships and a broader portfolio of services.
How does RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE compare to similar contractors?
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE appears to be a smaller player in the federal contracting market, relying on competitive bidding for its contracts. The company's lack of sole-source contracts and the absence of significant recent activity suggest that it may face challenges in securing new business. However, the firm's focus on competitive bidding indicates a strong commitment to fair and transparent processes, which could be a competitive advantage in a market where many contractors rely on sole-source contracts.
Recent Federal Contracts
Rutherford & Chekene has 1 federal contracts on record. Below are the largest awards:
| Contract | Agency | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSA awards $93.7K for seismic evaluation study to Rutherford & Chekene under ... | General Services Administration | $93.7K | N/A |