CACI-ISS, LLC awarded $18M for Wired Telecommunications Carriers services to the Department of the Army

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,969,477 ($18.0M)

Contractor: Caci-Iss, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-04-26

End Date: 2011-08-13

Contract Duration: 1,570 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: LABOR

Place of Performance

Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, ALBEMARLE County, VIRGINIA, 22911

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.0 million to CACI-ISS, LLC for work described as: LABOR Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The contract duration of over 3 years indicates a significant need for ongoing services. 3. The award to CACI-ISS, LLC, a large business, raises questions about small business participation. 4. Services fall under the Wired Telecommunications Carriers NAICS code, a common IT infrastructure category. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major defense spender. 6. The value of the contract is moderate within the context of large federal IT procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $18 million over its period of performance appears reasonable for wired telecommunications services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for telecommunications infrastructure within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the full and open competition suggests that pricing was likely scrutinized against market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that typically leads to lower prices and better value for the services procured.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from reliable wired telecommunications infrastructure, essential for command and control, data transmission, and operational readiness. This contract supports the delivery of critical communication services to military personnel and operations. The geographic impact is primarily within the areas served by the Department of the Army, likely across various installations. The contract supports jobs within the telecommunications and IT services sector, contributing to the federal workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized and difficult to transition.
Reliance on a single large contractor may limit opportunities for smaller, innovative firms in future procurements.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Contract duration suggests a stable and predictable service delivery.
CACI-ISS, LLC is an established government contractor with a track record in IT services.

Sector Analysis

The Wired Telecommunications Carriers sector (NAICS 517110) encompasses establishments primarily engaged in operating and maintaining telecommunications networks, including the transmission of voice, data, and video. This includes providers of broadband internet, cable television, and local and long-distance telephone services. Federal spending in this area is substantial, supporting the backbone of government communications infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale telecommunications service contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, GSA, and other civilian departments.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to CACI-ISS, LLC, a large business, and the data indicates no small business set-aside (ss: false) or subcontracting goals (sb: false). This suggests that small businesses were not specifically targeted for this procurement. While large prime contractors often utilize small business subcontractors, the absence of explicit set-aside or subcontracting requirements means opportunities for small businesses may be limited or dependent on the prime contractor's discretion.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms and conditions, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Telecommunications Services
Information Technology Services
Network Infrastructure
Defense Communications

Risk Flags

Potential for technological obsolescence over contract duration.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical infrastructure.
Need for clear performance metrics and oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.0 million to CACI-ISS, LLC. LABOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI-ISS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-04-26. End: 2011-08-13.

What is CACI-ISS, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense for similar telecommunications contracts?

CACI-ISS, LLC has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense, including numerous awards for IT and telecommunications services. Their track record often includes large-scale support for network infrastructure, cybersecurity, and enterprise IT solutions. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any past performance evaluations or disputes, would provide further insight into their reliability and capability in delivering wired telecommunications services. Their extensive experience suggests a strong understanding of military communication requirements and the ability to manage complex projects within the defense sector.

How does the $18 million contract value compare to other wired telecommunications contracts awarded by the Department of the Army in the last five years?

The $18 million contract value for wired telecommunications services is a moderate-sized award within the Department of the Army's overall spending. The Army procures a wide range of telecommunications services, from small, localized installations to large enterprise-wide network upgrades. Contracts of this magnitude are common for supporting specific bases, regions, or specialized communication needs. Larger contracts, often in the hundreds of millions, typically involve comprehensive network modernization or nationwide service delivery. This $18 million award likely represents a significant but not the largest single procurement for such services, suggesting it addresses a defined scope of work.

What are the primary risks associated with a contract of this duration and value for wired telecommunications services?

Key risks for a contract of this duration (over 3 years) and value ($18M) include technological obsolescence, where the contracted services or equipment may become outdated before the contract ends. Another risk is vendor performance degradation over time, where the quality of service may decline. Cost escalation, particularly if not adequately controlled by contract terms, is also a concern. Furthermore, dependence on a single vendor for critical infrastructure can pose a risk if the vendor faces financial instability or operational disruptions. Ensuring robust performance metrics and contingency plans are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for money for wired telecommunications services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money in federal procurements, including for wired telecommunications services. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. This process allows the government to solicit proposals from a wide range of vendors, compare technical solutions and pricing, and select the offer that provides the best overall value. The presence of multiple bidders, as indicated in this case (3 bidders), further strengthens the competitive dynamic, increasing the likelihood that the government secures favorable terms and pricing.

What are the historical spending patterns for wired telecommunications carriers by the Department of the Army?

The Department of the Army consistently spends significant amounts on wired telecommunications carriers to maintain its vast communication infrastructure across numerous installations worldwide. Historical spending patterns show a continuous need for services such as network installation, maintenance, bandwidth provisioning, and related support. While specific annual figures fluctuate based on modernization initiatives, operational tempo, and budget allocations, the overall trend indicates a sustained and substantial investment in this category. This contract award aligns with these historical patterns, reflecting the ongoing requirement for reliable telecommunications to support military operations and administrative functions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,832,114

Exercised Options: $19,832,113

Current Obligation: $17,969,477

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91QUZ06D0020

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline