DoD Awards $16.5M for CSLA Services to VSE Corporation, Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,519,512 ($16.5M)
Contractor: VSE Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-06-06
End Date: 2011-01-30
Contract Duration: 1,334 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: CSLA SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.5 million to VSE CORPORATION for work described as: CSLA SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $16.5M for CSLA Services. 2. VSE Corporation is the sole awardee. 3. Awarded under Full and Open Competition. 4. Contract duration spans from 2007 to 2011.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The total award value is $16.5M, but without specific unit pricing or performance metrics, a precise value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure may limit price discovery and incentivize increased labor hours.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers by promoting competitive pricing. However, the T&M structure warrants close monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.
Public Impact
Ensures continued support for critical CSLA services. Supports Department of the Army operations. Awarded through a competitive process, potentially offering value for taxpayer dollars.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials pricing structure
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data
Positive Signals
- Full and Open Competition
- Established contract duration
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' NAICS code. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on defense needs and technological advancements. Benchmarks are difficult without more specific service details.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. This contract was awarded to VSE Corporation, a large business.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring, invoice review, and ensuring adherence to the Time and Materials terms by the Department of Defense. The duration of the contract suggests ongoing oversight was necessary.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Lack of detailed service description.
- No clear performance metrics provided.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, az, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.5 million to VSE CORPORATION. CSLA SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is VSE CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-06-06. End: 2011-01-30.
What specific CSLA services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of the Army's mission?
The provided data does not detail the specific CSLA services rendered. Understanding the nature of these services is crucial for assessing their operational importance and impact on the Department of the Army's objectives. Without this information, it's challenging to quantify the true value delivered beyond the financial award.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how did VSE Corporation perform against them?
Key performance indicators are not specified in the provided data. For a Time and Materials contract, effective oversight would focus on managing labor hours, material costs, and ensuring timely delivery of services. Performance assessment would require access to contract performance reports and quality assurance reviews.
How did the pricing under the Time and Materials structure compare to industry benchmarks for similar services?
Benchmarking T&M pricing requires detailed cost data, including labor rates, overhead, and material markups, which are not available. Generally, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost escalation compared to fixed-price contracts. A thorough review would involve comparing VSE's billed rates against established industry standards for comparable roles and services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2550 HUNTINGTON AVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,970,116
Exercised Options: $16,970,116
Current Obligation: $16,519,512
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB012
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-06-06
Current End Date: 2011-01-30
Potential End Date: 2011-01-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-09-18
More Contracts from VSE Corporation
- 200603!001420!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0703db012 !A!N! !Y!0069 ! !20051230!20090130!049997380!049997380!049997380!n!vse Corporation !2550 Huntington AVE !alexandria !va!22303!01000!510!51!alexandria !alexandria (city) !virginia !+000030653370!n!n!000000000000!r414!systems Engineering Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!014!b! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !C! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $428.9M (Department of Defense)
- CR-2417, "PM Assured Mobility Systems (AMS) RG31 and RG33 Family of Vehicles (fov)contractor Logistics Support (CLS)" — $324.8M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order for PM AMS Contractor Logistic Support for Route Clearance Equipment. Theater of Operations Iraq and Afghanistan — $272.5M (Department of Defense)
- Hourly Labor of Mechanics, Painters and Other SCA Covered Labor Categories AT RED River Army Depot — $210.0M (Department of Defense)
- Siezed and Forfetited Assets — $194.3M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)