EPA awards $10.5M Environmental Consulting Services contract to ICF Consulting under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,522,990 ($10.5M)
Contractor: ICF Consulting
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2002-03-15
End Date: 2007-09-03
Contract Duration: 1,998 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $10.5 million to ICF CONSULTING for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract Value: $10.5 million over approximately 5 years. 2. Competition: Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting market availability. 3. Risk: Moderate risk due to cost-plus contract type and duration. 4. Sector: Environmental consulting services, a specialized field.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts is difficult without more specific service details.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing, but the cost-plus structure warrants close monitoring to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
Public Impact
Environmental protection services impacting public health and natural resources. Potential for long-term environmental impact assessment and remediation efforts. Contractor expertise in environmental science and policy is crucial for effective service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost-plus contract type
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation noted
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition
- Established contractor (ICF Consulting)
- Clear agency need (EPA)
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services are critical for agencies like the EPA to manage environmental regulations, assess impacts, and develop solutions. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on regulatory changes and project scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-aside goals were considered or if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The EPA is responsible for overseeing this contract to ensure services are delivered effectively and within budget. Robust oversight is particularly important for cost-plus contracts to manage expenses.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost-plus contract type can lead to higher costs.
- Long contract duration increases exposure to potential issues.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited detail on specific services procured.
- Potential for scope creep without strict management.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, environmental-protection-agency, dc, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $10.5 million to ICF CONSULTING. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ICF CONSULTING.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-03-15. End: 2007-09-03.
What specific environmental services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with EPA's strategic goals?
The contract was for 'Environmental Consulting Services' (NAICS 541620). While specific services aren't detailed, they likely encompass areas such as environmental impact assessments, regulatory compliance support, policy analysis, and technical assistance related to EPA's mission of protecting human health and the environment. Alignment with strategic goals would depend on the EPA's current priorities and program needs during the contract period.
What were the key factors that led to the selection of ICF Consulting, and were there any performance concerns from previous contracts?
As the contract was awarded under full and open competition, ICF Consulting was likely selected based on a combination of technical qualifications, proposed approach, and price. Without access to the source selection decision document, specific factors are unknown. Performance concerns from previous contracts would typically be evaluated during the bidding process, but this information is not available in the provided data.
How effectively did the cost-plus fixed fee structure balance cost control with the need for specialized environmental expertise?
Cost-plus fixed fee contracts aim to provide flexibility for specialized services where costs are difficult to estimate upfront, while incentivizing the contractor to achieve a fixed profit. However, they carry a risk of cost overruns if the 'cost' component is not rigorously managed and audited by the agency. The effectiveness hinges on strong government oversight and clear definition of the fixed fee.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: SDA
Contractor Details
Address: 1725 I ST NW 1000, WASHINGTON, DC, 98
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,614,849
Exercised Options: $7,974,116
Current Obligation: $10,522,990
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-03-15
Current End Date: 2007-09-03
Potential End Date: 2007-09-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-05-12
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)