EPA awards $10.4M contract to ICF INC for environmental services, spanning nearly two years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,402,234 ($10.4M)

Contractor: ICF Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 1999-10-15

End Date: 2001-11-30

Contract Duration: 777 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $10.4 million to ICF INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.4M for environmental services. 2. ICF INC is the sole awardee. 3. Contract duration of 777 days. 4. Awarded under full and open competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.4M for a duration of 777 days suggests a daily rate of approximately $13,388. This rate needs to be benchmarked against similar environmental consulting contracts to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: $13,388

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the environmental services rendered.

Public Impact

Environmental protection services are crucial for public health and ecological balance. The contract supports the EPA's mission to safeguard the environment. ICF INC's role in environmental consulting impacts regulatory compliance and sustainability efforts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically environmental consulting. Benchmarks for similar EPA contracts would indicate if the $13,388 daily rate is competitive.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically involve monitoring ICF INC's performance against contract requirements and ensuring adherence to the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure by the EPA.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-protection-agency, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $10.4 million to ICF INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ICF INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-10-15. End: 2001-11-30.

What specific environmental services were rendered under this contract, and how do they align with the EPA's strategic goals?

The provided data lacks specifics on the environmental services. However, given the agency (EPA) and the contractor (ICF INC, known for environmental consulting), services likely included areas such as environmental assessment, regulatory compliance support, policy analysis, or program management related to environmental protection. These services would align with the EPA's overarching mission to protect human health and the environment.

How does the $13,388 daily rate compare to industry benchmarks for similar environmental consulting services provided to federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $13,388 daily rate requires access to a database of comparable federal contracts. Factors like the specific expertise required, the complexity of the environmental issues, and the geographic location of services would influence this comparison. Without such data, it's difficult to definitively assess if this rate is high or low relative to the market.

What mechanisms were in place to ensure cost control and prevent overruns within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure for this contract?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts require robust oversight to manage costs. The EPA would have likely established reporting requirements for ICF INC, regular reviews of expenditures, and potentially performance-based incentives or penalties. The fixed fee component provides some incentive for the contractor to manage costs efficiently, but the government bears the risk of cost overruns.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Contractor Details

Address: 9 GALEN ST, WATERTOWN

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-10-15

Current End Date: 2001-11-30

Potential End Date: 2001-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-11-15

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending