DoD's $22.4M Booz Allen Contract for Management Consulting Services: A Deep Dive
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,437,298 ($22.4M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-10-30
End Date: 2015-07-02
Contract Duration: 2,071 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: LABOR
Place of Performance
Location: FORT MONROE, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23651
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: LABOR Key points: 1. Significant contract value awarded to a major player in the consulting sector. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential for high taxpayer impact due to the substantial contract amount. 4. The contract falls within the administrative and general management consulting services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.4 million over its duration appears reasonable for comprehensive management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government contracts for these services would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition indicates that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to a more competitive price. This method is generally preferred for ensuring fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The $22.4 million expenditure represents a significant investment of taxpayer funds for management consulting services, necessitating careful oversight to ensure value for money.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded a substantial contract for essential administrative and management consulting. The Department of the Army utilized a competitive process to procure these services. The duration of the contract (2009-2015) suggests a long-term need for these consulting services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy, potentially leading to scope creep or evolving needs.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under professional services, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs, but large contracts like this are common for strategic support.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not a direct awardee on this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no information provided on whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, a large agency with established oversight mechanisms. However, the length of the contract and its significant value warrant continuous monitoring to ensure performance and cost-effectiveness.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lengthy contract duration.
- No explicit small business participation noted.
- Potential for cost overruns or scope creep in long-term contracts.
- Lack of specific performance outcome data.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. LABOR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-10-30. End: 2015-07-02.
What specific outcomes or deliverables were achieved through this $22.4 million consulting contract, and how were they measured against initial objectives?
The provided data does not detail specific outcomes or deliverables. To assess value, a review of performance reports, final deliverables, and any post-contract evaluations would be necessary. Understanding the initial objectives and how the contractor's work contributed to achieving them is crucial for determining if the $22.4 million investment yielded the intended benefits for the Department of the Army.
Given the 'full and open competition' award, were there any concerns raised during the bidding process regarding the fairness of the competition or the final price negotiated?
The data indicates 'full and open competition,' which generally promotes fairness. However, without access to the solicitation details, bid protests, or negotiation records, it's impossible to definitively rule out concerns. The significant contract value suggests a thorough negotiation process should have occurred, but potential issues could arise from bid protests or perceived imbalances in proposal evaluations.
How effectively did Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. meet the administrative management and general management consulting needs of the Department of the Army over the contract's lifespan?
Effectiveness is not directly quantifiable from the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing contractor performance evaluations, user feedback from the Department of the Army, and any documented impacts of the consulting services on operational efficiency or strategic goals. The contract's duration and value imply a sustained engagement, suggesting a level of perceived effectiveness, but formal metrics are needed for a definitive judgment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W91WAW09R0106
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,437,895
Exercised Options: $22,437,895
Current Obligation: $22,437,298
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-10-30
Current End Date: 2015-07-02
Potential End Date: 2015-07-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)