DoD's $12.4M contract for administrative management consulting services awarded to Computer Systems Center Inc. in 2008

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,404,427 ($12.4M)

Contractor: Computer Systems Center Incorporated

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-05-16

End Date: 2013-07-15

Contract Duration: 1,886 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.4 million to COMPUTER SYSTEMS CENTER INCORPORATED for work described as: SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP) Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 3. It was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The contract duration was 1886 days. 5. The contractor is Computer Systems Center Incorporated. 6. The awarding agency was the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy. 7. The contract falls under the NAICS code 541611.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific deliverables or performance metrics. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs, but the total value of over $12 million for a five-year period (approximately $2.48 million per year) for administrative management consulting needs to be evaluated against the specific services rendered. Without more detail on the scope of work and the outcomes achieved, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. Comparisons to similar contracts would require identifying specific consulting services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that it was competed suggests a deliberate effort to solicit multiple proposals and select the best value. However, the number of bidders is not provided, which limits the assessment of the intensity of the competition. A robust competition typically leads to better pricing and service innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and improve the quality of services received.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the Department of the Navy and potentially other entities within the Department of Defense requiring administrative management and general management consulting services. The services delivered would have focused on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of administrative operations. The geographic impact is centered around the District of Columbia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications could include the direct employment of consultants by Computer Systems Center Incorporated and potential impacts on the administrative workforce within the Navy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true impact and value delivered.
The duration of the contract (over 5 years) could lead to potential complacency or a need for re-evaluation of services.
Limited information on the specific consulting services provided hinders a detailed analysis of effectiveness.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
Firm fixed-price contract type helps in cost control and predictability for the government.
The contractor, Computer Systems Center Incorporated, has secured a significant contract, indicating a level of trust and capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise to improve efficiency, strategy, and management practices. The market size for government consulting services is substantial, with agencies frequently seeking external expertise to address complex challenges. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending on management consulting, which can range from strategic planning to operational improvements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The focus was on full and open competition, which typically involves larger, established firms. The impact on the small business ecosystem is indirect, as resources may be directed towards larger prime contractors rather than small business subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Navy. As a definitive contract, it would be subject to standard government contracting oversight procedures, including contract administration and performance monitoring. Transparency is generally expected for federal contracts, though specific details of Special Access Programs (SAP) might be restricted. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Administrative Support Contracts
Federal Management Consulting Services
Navy IT and Administrative Services
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule Contracts for Consulting

Risk Flags

Special Access Program (SAP) designation may indicate sensitive or classified work, limiting transparency.
Contract duration of over 5 years could pose risks related to evolving requirements and contractor performance over time.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes objective assessment of value difficult.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.4 million to COMPUTER SYSTEMS CENTER INCORPORATED. SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMPUTER SYSTEMS CENTER INCORPORATED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-05-16. End: 2013-07-15.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' under NAICS code 541611. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts could encompass a wide range of activities including organizational analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, policy development, program management support, and general management advice aimed at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the Department of the Navy's operations. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders, a precise breakdown of services rendered cannot be determined. These services are crucial for optimizing administrative functions within large government organizations.

How does the $12.4 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing the $12.4 million contract value for administrative management and general management consulting services requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. This contract spanned approximately five years (1886 days), equating to an average annual value of roughly $2.48 million. Benchmarking this against similar DoD contracts would involve analyzing contracts under NAICS code 541611 awarded over comparable periods. Factors such as the specific agency (e.g., Army, Air Force, other Navy commands), the complexity of the issues addressed, and the level of expertise required significantly influence pricing. Without detailed performance metrics and specific deliverables for this contract, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a multi-year, firm-fixed-price contract of this magnitude, it suggests a substantial engagement requiring significant consultant resources.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. For administrative management and general management consulting services, KPIs could typically include measures related to efficiency improvements (e.g., reduction in processing times, cost savings achieved), effectiveness of implemented strategies, successful completion of strategic planning initiatives, or improvements in organizational structure. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it challenging to quantitatively assess the contractor's performance and the overall success of the engagement in achieving its intended objectives for the Department of the Navy.

What is the track record of Computer Systems Center Incorporated in securing and performing on federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Computer Systems Center Incorporated (CSCI) has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Defense. This specific contract, valued at over $12.4 million and awarded in 2008, demonstrates their capability to win and perform on significant government engagements. CSCI's portfolio often includes IT services, management consulting, and other professional services. Their ability to secure contracts under full and open competition suggests they are competitive in the federal marketplace. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing their performance history on other contracts, including past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, and their overall financial stability, which are not detailed in the provided summary data.

Were there any notable risks or challenges associated with this contract, either during procurement or execution?

The provided data does not explicitly detail risks or challenges associated with this contract. However, general risks inherent in large, multi-year consulting contracts include scope creep, potential for cost overruns (though mitigated by firm-fixed-price), contractor performance issues, and alignment with evolving government needs. Given that this contract was awarded under full and open competition, the procurement process itself likely involved standard risk mitigation strategies, such as thorough evaluation of proposals and contractor qualifications. The Special Access Program (SAP) designation might imply heightened security or operational risks that are not publicly disclosed. Without further information, specific challenges remain speculative.

How has federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services evolved since this contract was awarded in 2008?

Federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services has generally seen fluctuations but has remained a significant area of expenditure since 2008. Agencies consistently seek external expertise to improve operational efficiency, implement new technologies, and navigate complex policy environments. While this specific contract was for over $12 million, overall federal spending in this category encompasses a much larger market, often driven by major initiatives, budget cycles, and evolving government priorities. Post-2008, factors like increased focus on cybersecurity, data analytics, and digital transformation have likely influenced the types of consulting services procured, potentially shifting some spending towards more specialized areas within the broader management consulting umbrella.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W91WAW08R0015

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6225 BRANDON AVE STE 520, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 22150

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,533,795

Exercised Options: $12,533,795

Current Obligation: $12,404,427

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline