DoD's $14.9M administrative management contract with DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC shows fair value but limited competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,946,963 ($14.9M)
Contractor: Davis-Paige Management Systems LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-05-31
End Date: 2012-12-14
Contract Duration: 2,024 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SENIOR ANALYST II
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20310
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: SENIOR ANALYST II Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and service type. 2. Competition was limited, potentially impacting price discovery. 3. No significant risk indicators identified in contract performance. 4. Services provided are standard administrative management consulting. 5. Contract falls within a common spending category for defense agencies. 6. Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of approximately $14.9 million over its life appears reasonable for administrative management consulting services provided to the Department of the Army. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services suggests that the pricing structure, being Firm Fixed Price, likely provided cost certainty. While specific per-unit costs are not detailed, the overall value aligns with industry standards for long-term engagements of this nature.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded. The data specifies 3 bidders participated. A limited number of bidders can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing compared to broader competitions, though the Firm Fixed Price structure mitigates some of this risk. The exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into the rationale.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price for taxpayers than if a broader range of vendors had been able to bid. However, the specific impact is difficult to quantify without knowing the excluded sources and the nature of the competition.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from administrative management and general management consulting services. These services likely support operational efficiency and strategic planning within the agency. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications are likely internal to the Army, focusing on improved management practices rather than direct job creation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about potential price inflation.
- The 'after exclusion of sources' clause requires scrutiny to ensure fairness and necessity.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides budget predictability.
- Contract duration of over 5 years suggests a stable, ongoing need for services.
- The contractor is based in the District of Columbia, potentially aligning with agency proximity needs.
Sector Analysis
Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a significant sector within federal contracting, supporting a wide array of government functions. Spending in this category often supports strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and program management. The Department of Defense is a major consumer of these services, utilizing them to navigate complex operational and administrative challenges. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar long-term consulting contracts within the federal government can vary widely based on scope and duration, but this contract's value falls within a common range for such engagements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The focus was on full and open competition, albeit with exclusions.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver defined services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific performance reviews and audits are internal processes. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Commercialization Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Defense-wide Administrative Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential for less than optimal price discovery.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, definitive-contract, full-and-open-competition-after-exclusion-of-sources, district-of-columbia, professional-services, management-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC. SENIOR ANALYST II
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-05-31. End: 2012-12-14.
What is the track record of DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC with federal contracts?
DAVIS-PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC has been awarded multiple federal contracts, primarily within the Department of Defense. The provided data indicates this specific contract, valued at approximately $14.9 million, was a Definitive Contract with a Firm Fixed Price structure, running from May 2007 to December 2012. While this data point shows a significant contract, a comprehensive track record analysis would require examining all their federal awards, including performance history, past performance evaluations, and any documented issues or successes across different agencies and contract types. Understanding their history with similar administrative management consulting services would be crucial for assessing their reliability and expertise.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts?
The total contract value of $14.9 million over its approximately 5.4-year duration equates to an average annual value of roughly $2.76 million. This figure appears to be within a reasonable range for administrative management and general management consulting services provided to a large federal agency like the Department of the Army. Benchmarking against similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements for NAICS code 541611, considering factors like contract scope, complexity, geographic location, and the specific services rendered. However, without more granular comparative data, the value seems aligned with typical market rates for such professional services in the federal space.
What are the primary risks associated with this type of contract?
The primary risks associated with this Firm Fixed Price contract for administrative management consulting include potential scope creep if not managed tightly, contractor underperformance leading to service quality issues, and the risk that the fixed price may become uncompetitive if market rates decrease significantly during the contract term. Given the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type, there's also a risk related to the fairness and justification of the source exclusion, which could imply a less competitive environment than ideal. Ensuring robust oversight and clear performance metrics are key to mitigating these risks.
How effective are administrative management consulting services in improving federal agency operations?
The effectiveness of administrative management consulting services in improving federal agency operations is highly variable and depends on several factors. When well-executed, these services can lead to significant improvements in efficiency, cost savings, strategic alignment, and overall organizational performance. Consultants can bring specialized expertise, objective perspectives, and best practices from other organizations. However, effectiveness is contingent upon the clarity of objectives, the quality of the consulting firm, the agency's willingness to adopt recommendations, and the robustness of implementation support. For this specific contract, assessing effectiveness would require reviewing performance reports, achieved milestones, and any documented impact on the Department of the Army's operations.
What are the historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting services within the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense (DoD) is a substantial spender on administrative management and general management consulting services, reflecting the complexity and scale of its operations. Historical spending patterns show a consistent demand for these services across various branches, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to support functions ranging from strategic planning and organizational restructuring to process improvement and IT management. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on budgetary priorities, specific program needs, and the initiation of large-scale reform or modernization efforts. The DoD's reliance on external expertise is a long-standing practice to augment internal capabilities and address specialized challenges.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Solicitation ID: W91WAW07R0026
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11616 HAVENNER RD, FAIRFAX STATION, VA, 22039
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,412,421
Exercised Options: $25,153,093
Current Obligation: $14,946,963
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-05-31
Current End Date: 2012-12-14
Potential End Date: 2012-12-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Davis-Paige Management Systems LLC
- Contractor Support - Labor — $18.8M (Department of Defense)
View all Davis-Paige Management Systems LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)