DoD's $12.4M IT and Telecom Contract Awarded to BEAT-ATC LLC for Fort Campbell Operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,441,706 ($12.4M)

Contractor: Beat-Atc Limited Liability Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-01-31

End Date: 2026-10-30

Contract Duration: 1,003 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE TELEPHONE SERVICES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION SERVICES IV BLUEGRASS REGIONAL NETWORK ENTERPRISE CENTER FORT CAMPBELL KENTUCKY

Place of Performance

Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.4 million to BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE TELEPHONE SERVICES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION SERVICES IV BLUEGRASS REGIONAL NETWORK ENTERPRISE CENTER FORT CAMPBELL KENTUCKY Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential IT and communication services for Fort Campbell, ensuring operational continuity. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of approximately 2.8 years (1003 days) provides a stable period for service delivery. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 5. The contract value is significant, reflecting the critical nature of IT and communication infrastructure for military bases. 6. Performance is located in Kentucky, impacting the regional IT services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.4 million over roughly 2.8 years appears reasonable for comprehensive IT and telecommunication services at a major military installation like Fort Campbell. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of well-defined requirements and cost control by the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-defined criteria. The presence of 21 bids suggests a robust level of competition, which is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process with 21 offers is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down the final contract price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, specifically the Army at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, ensuring reliable IT and communication services. Services delivered include administrative telephone, information technology, and communication services management. The geographic impact is concentrated at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, supporting military operations and personnel. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for IT and telecommunications professionals in the Kentucky region, both directly with the contractor and indirectly.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized and difficult to transition.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT infrastructure could pose risks if performance falters.
Ensuring compliance with evolving cybersecurity standards for military networks will be crucial.

Positive Signals

Award to a single LLC suggests a focused service provider potentially adept at meeting specific needs.
The firm fixed-price contract type incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently.
A competitive award process with multiple bidders generally leads to better service quality and pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology and Telecommunications sector, a critical area for government operations. The market for IT services to the federal government is substantial, with agencies increasingly relying on external providers for specialized support. This contract represents a significant investment in maintaining robust communication and IT infrastructure for a key military installation, aligning with broader trends of IT modernization and outsourcing within the defense sector.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if BEAT-ATC LLC chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army at Fort Campbell. Performance monitoring, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and regular progress reviews are standard mechanisms to ensure contractor compliance and service delivery. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

DoD Enterprise IT Services
Military Base Communications Infrastructure
Federal IT Support Contracts
Information Management Services
Telecommunications Services for Government

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues given the critical nature of services.
Cybersecurity risks associated with managing military IT infrastructure.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential communication services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.4 million to BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. ADMINISTRATIVE TELEPHONE SERVICES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION SERVICES IV BLUEGRASS REGIONAL NETWORK ENTERPRISE CENTER FORT CAMPBELL KENTUCKY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-01-31. End: 2026-10-30.

What is the track record of BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY in performing similar federal contracts?

Assessing the track record of BEAT-ATC LLC requires examining their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving IT, telecommunications, and support services for military installations. A review of contract databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would reveal previous awards, contract values, performance ratings, and any history of disputes or corrective actions. Understanding their experience with firm fixed-price contracts and the scale of previous projects is crucial to gauge their capability to successfully execute this $12.4 million award for Fort Campbell. Without specific historical data on BEAT-ATC LLC's performance, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability for this critical function.

How does the awarded price compare to similar IT and telecommunication services contracts for military bases?

To benchmark the $12.4 million award, one would compare it against contracts for similar IT and telecommunication services at comparable military installations. Factors such as base size, scope of services (e.g., network management, cybersecurity, user support, telephony), contract duration, and geographic location influence pricing. Analyzing data from recent awards for similar services at bases of similar size and complexity would reveal if this contract represents a competitive market rate. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, and comparing the per-year cost or cost per user against benchmarks would indicate value for money. A higher-than-average cost might warrant further investigation into the specific requirements or market conditions.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the managed IT systems, and the possibility of cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen technical challenges. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the Army, adherence to strict cybersecurity protocols mandated by DoD, and clear contract terms defining deliverables and service level agreements. The competitive nature of the award may also mitigate risks by selecting a contractor with a proven ability to deliver. Regular audits and inspections would further identify and address risks proactively.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring optimal value?

This contracting approach aims to balance broad competition with the need to potentially exclude certain sources based on specific, justifiable criteria (e.g., security clearances, specialized capabilities, past performance issues). While 'full and open' competition generally promotes price discovery and innovation, the 'exclusion of sources' element means the government may not be considering all potential offerors. The effectiveness in ensuring optimal value depends heavily on the justification for the exclusions. If the exclusions are well-reasoned and the remaining pool of bidders is still sufficiently competitive (as evidenced by 21 offers), it can lead to good value. However, if exclusions are arbitrary or limit competition unduly, it could result in suboptimal pricing or fewer innovative solutions.

What is the historical spending trend for IT and communication services at Fort Campbell?

Analyzing historical spending on IT and communication services at Fort Campbell would involve reviewing past contracts awarded for similar functions over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors utilized. Understanding this history can help determine if the current $12.4 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment compared to previous periods. It can also highlight any shifts in technology or service requirements. For instance, a significant increase might indicate new infrastructure investments or expanded service needs, while a decrease could suggest efficiency gains or consolidation of services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - NETWORK

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 802 E QUINCY ST, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,606,842

Exercised Options: $17,420,004

Current Obligation: $12,441,706

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91RUS23D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline