DoD Food Service Contract Awarded to ServiceSource Inc. for $2.38M to Support Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall Dining Facilities

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,381,353 ($2.4M)

Contractor: Servicesource Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-07-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS JOINT BASE MEYER HENDERSON HALL (JBMHH) FOOD SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT (DFA) SERVICE AND COOK SUPPORT NEEDS AT THE DESIGNATED DINING FACILITY.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT MYER, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22211

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $2.4 million to SERVICESOURCE INC for work described as: THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS JOINT BASE MEYER HENDERSON HALL (JBMHH) FOOD SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT (DFA) SERVICE AND COOK SUPPORT NEEDS AT THE DESIGNATED DINING FACILITY. Key points: 1. Contract aims to ensure adequate dining facility attendant and cook support services. 2. ServiceSource Inc. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty. 4. Performance period spans one year, from July 2025 to June 2026. 5. The contract value is $2.38 million, supporting essential base operations. 6. No small business set-aside was indicated for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.38 million for a one-year food service support contract at a single base appears within a reasonable range for such services. However, without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., number of personnel, hours, specific duties) or comparable contract data for similar bases, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the absence of competition could lead to a less optimal price than a fully competed contract might yield.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. The data indicates it was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This approach is typically used when only one vendor can provide the required services, often due to unique capabilities, existing infrastructure, or specific program requirements. The lack of competition limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding, as there was no opportunity for multiple vendors to offer lower prices.

Public Impact

Service members and personnel at Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall will benefit from consistent and adequate food service support. The contract ensures the availability of dining facility attendants and cooks, crucial for daily operations. Services are geographically focused on Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall in Virginia. The contract supports the operational readiness and morale of the base personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pressure, potentially impacting price efficiency.
Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Clear performance period (one year) allows for focused oversight.
Supports essential base operations, contributing to mission readiness.

Sector Analysis

The food service industry within the federal sector is substantial, encompassing a wide range of support services for military bases, government facilities, and other public institutions. Contracts in this space often involve janitorial services, culinary support, and facility maintenance. While specific market size data for food service at individual bases is not readily available, the overall federal spending on facility support services is in the billions. This contract fits within the broader category of base operations and support services, where efficiency and reliable delivery are key performance indicators.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The sole-source nature of the award further limits opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific procurement. The impact on the small business ecosystem is minimal for this particular contract, as it was not designed to foster small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army, which is responsible for managing services at Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (though the parent contract type is not specified), oversight mechanisms would likely involve contract officers, contracting specialists, and base personnel responsible for service delivery and performance monitoring. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award, and specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues arising.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Services
Food Service Contracts
Janitorial and Maintenance Services
Department of Defense Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award raises concerns about price competitiveness.
Lack of detailed scope of work makes value assessment difficult.
Potential for service disruption if contractor performance is inadequate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $2.4 million to SERVICESOURCE INC. THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS JOINT BASE MEYER HENDERSON HALL (JBMHH) FOOD SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MEET DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT (DFA) SERVICE AND COOK SUPPORT NEEDS AT THE DESIGNATED DINING FACILITY.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SERVICESOURCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of ServiceSource Inc. with similar federal food service contracts?

ServiceSource Inc. has a history of providing various support services to the federal government, though their primary focus has often been on services for individuals with disabilities and workforce development programs. Information regarding their specific track record in large-scale federal food service contracts, particularly those involving extensive culinary operations or large dining facilities, is not detailed in the provided data. A deeper dive into their contract history would be necessary to assess their experience and performance in this specific domain. It is important to distinguish between general support services and specialized food service operations, as the skill sets and operational demands can differ significantly.

How does the $2.38 million contract value compare to similar food service contracts at other military bases?

Benchmarking this $2.38 million contract value against similar food service contracts at other military bases requires detailed information on the scope of services, the size of the dining facilities, the number of personnel supported, and the duration of the contract. A one-year contract for food service support at a single base can vary significantly in cost. For instance, contracts supporting larger bases with multiple dining halls and higher troop counts could easily exceed this amount, while smaller installations might have contracts well below it. Without these specifics, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or concerning value. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests a degree of cost control.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for essential base services like food?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for essential base services like food include potential overpricing due to lack of competition, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve service quality beyond minimum requirements, and a lack of flexibility if the contractor's performance deteriorates or if needs change significantly. Taxpayers may bear a higher cost than if the contract were competed. Furthermore, reliance on a single provider can create vulnerabilities if that provider faces financial difficulties, operational disruptions, or fails to meet contractual obligations, potentially impacting base morale and readiness.

What are the performance expectations and metrics for this food service contract?

While the provided data specifies the contract is for 'DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT (DFA) SERVICE AND COOK SUPPORT NEEDS,' it does not detail the specific performance expectations or metrics. Typically, such contracts would include requirements related to food quality, safety standards (e.g., health inspections), service timeliness, personnel conduct, and adherence to dietary guidelines. Performance would likely be monitored by base officials through regular inspections, feedback mechanisms from service members, and potentially key performance indicators (KPIs) outlined in the contract's statement of work. Failure to meet these standards could result in contract remedies.

What is the historical spending trend for food service at Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall?

The provided data does not include historical spending trends for food service at Joint Base Meyer Henderson Hall. To analyze this, one would need to access previous contract awards for similar services at this specific installation. Understanding past spending patterns, including contract values, durations, and any changes in service scope, is crucial for assessing whether the current $2.38 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in these essential services. Without this context, it is difficult to identify long-term trends or potential anomalies.

Does the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status indicate a specific justification, such as a national emergency or unique capability?

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status, often referred to as a sole-source justification, implies that the contracting agency (in this case, the Department of the Army) determined that only one responsible source was capable of providing the required services. Common justifications include unique technical qualifications, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling needs where competition is impractical, or situations where a previous contract was terminated and only one other source exists. The specific reason for this determination would be documented in the contract file, often requiring approval at higher levels within the agency to ensure proper justification and prevent unnecessary sole-source awards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Janitorial Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10467 WHITE GRANITE DRIVE, OAKTON, VA, 22124

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,175,138

Exercised Options: $3,175,138

Current Obligation: $2,381,353

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9124J22D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline