DOD's $15M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,026,741 ($15.0M)

Contractor: Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-08-16

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 410 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Defense

Official Description: BASE OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OCT/NOV 2009

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.0 million to SUH'DUTSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: BASE OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OCT/NOV 2009 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities support services, indicating a need for ongoing operational maintenance. 2. The contract duration of 410 days suggests a medium-term requirement for these services. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Army, this contract falls under defense sector spending. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services. 5. The contract was not competitively procured, raising questions about potential value for money. 6. The base value of the contract is approximately $15 million, covering a period of over a year.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and comparison points. The raw dollar amount of $15 million for a little over a year of base operations and maintenance suggests a significant investment. However, without knowing the scope of services, the number of facilities covered, or the specific maintenance tasks required, it's difficult to assess if this represents a fair price. The lack of competitive bidding further complicates a value assessment, as there's no market-driven price discovery to compare against.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competition from other potential vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities, or in urgent situations where a competitive process is not feasible. The lack of competition means that the Department of the Army did not explore alternative providers or negotiate based on multiple bids, which can sometimes lead to higher prices.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government did not leverage market forces to ensure cost-effectiveness for this significant expenditure.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army, ensuring the operational readiness of facilities. Services delivered include essential base operations and maintenance, crucial for supporting military personnel and operations. The geographic impact is concentrated within the area where the facilities are located, likely a military installation. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for personnel involved in facilities management and maintenance, potentially through Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition and potentially value for money.
Limited public information on the specific services and performance metrics makes oversight difficult.
Contract duration and value warrant scrutiny to ensure continued necessity and fair pricing.

Positive Signals

Award to a specific LLC suggests a targeted approach to meeting a particular need.
The contract is for essential base operations and maintenance, critical for government functions.
The award is managed by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of activities necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and other real estate. This includes services like janitorial, security, landscaping, and general maintenance. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, particularly for its extensive portfolio of military bases, government buildings, and other installations. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on defense needs, infrastructure upgrades, and operational requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by various government agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration for this contract, as the awardee is Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC, and the 'sb' field is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. This suggests that the contract was not specifically structured to benefit small businesses, and their involvement would likely depend on the prime contractor's own subcontracting decisions, which are not detailed here. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore indirect and potentially limited.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. As a Department of Defense contract, it is also subject to oversight by the Department of Defense Inspector General. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award and the lack of publicly available detailed performance metrics. Accountability measures would be defined within the contract's terms and conditions, including reporting requirements and potential penalties for non-performance.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Base Operations Support
Army Facilities Engineering
Government Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Defense Infrastructure Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competition
Limited transparency on services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.0 million to SUH'DUTSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. BASE OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OCT/NOV 2009

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUH'DUTSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-08-16. End: 2010-09-30.

What is the specific scope of services covered under this 'Base Operations & Maintenance' contract?

The provided data identifies the contract as 'BASE OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE' and assigns it the NAICS code 561210 for Facilities Support Services. However, it does not detail the specific tasks included within this broad category. Typically, such contracts can encompass a wide array of services including, but not limited to, building maintenance and repair, groundskeeping, custodial services, pest control, waste management, and potentially security or minor construction/renovation activities. Without a detailed statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), the precise deliverables and operational scope remain undefined in the provided summary.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis instead of being competed?

The data explicitly states the contract type as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which is synonymous with a sole-source award. The reasons for sole-sourcing are not provided in the summary data. Common justifications for sole-source awards include situations where only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services (e.g., proprietary technology, unique expertise), or in cases of urgent and compelling need where a competitive process would cause unacceptable delays. Without further documentation or justification from the Department of the Army, the specific rationale for bypassing competition remains unknown.

What is the track record of Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Information regarding the track record of Suh'dutsing Technologies, LLC is not included in the provided data summary. To assess their performance history, one would typically need to consult databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to review past contract awards, performance evaluations, and any reported issues. The absence of this information in the summary makes it difficult to gauge the contractor's reliability and past success in fulfilling similar facilities support service requirements for the government.

How does the $15 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

The base value of this contract is approximately $15 million for a period of 410 days (roughly 13.5 months). To benchmark this, one would need to compare it against other facilities support services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar scopes of work, facility sizes, and geographic locations. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it is difficult to definitively state whether $15 million represents a high, low, or average cost. However, for a year-long base operations and maintenance contract, this figure suggests a substantial requirement, potentially covering a significant installation or a complex set of services.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for facilities support services?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for facilities support services is the potential lack of cost-effectiveness. Without competition, the government may not achieve the lowest possible price, as market forces driving competitive bidding are absent. There's also a risk that the chosen contractor may not be the most innovative or efficient provider available. Furthermore, sole-source awards can sometimes raise concerns about fairness and equal opportunity for other capable businesses. For essential services like base operations, a poorly managed sole-source contract could lead to service disruptions or substandard performance if the contractor is not adequately incentivized or monitored.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Army?

The provided data only pertains to a single contract award from October/November 2009. To understand historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Army, a comprehensive analysis of federal procurement data over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve aggregating spending data for NAICS code 561210 and related categories across various Army commands and installations. Such an analysis would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, dominant contractors, and the prevalence of competitive versus sole-source awards over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 600 N 100 E, CEDAR CITY, UT, 02

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,071,286

Exercised Options: $15,071,286

Current Obligation: $15,026,741

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline