Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $29.7M for Computer Systems Design Services by the Department of Defense

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,681,667 ($29.7M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-05-09

End Date: 2010-05-15

Contract Duration: 1,832 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: LEAVENWORTH, LEAVENWORTH County, KANSAS, 66048

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.7 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1832 days indicates a long-term engagement for complex services. 3. Services fall under Computer Systems Design, a critical area for defense operations. 4. The award was made by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 5. No small business set-aside was applied, indicating the primary award was not specifically targeted for small businesses. 6. The contract was awarded as a combination type, potentially involving multiple task orders or service types.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $29.7 million contract requires more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. Without specific deliverables or comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration suggests a significant investment in systems design, which can be cost-effective if it leads to improved operational efficiency and reduced long-term IT costs for the Army. The absence of specific performance data makes a precise value assessment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that it was competed suggests that the Department of the Army sought the best possible solution and price. The number of bidders is not specified, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down costs and ensures that the government receives a competitive price for the services rendered. This process helps to prevent inflated pricing and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced computer systems design, potentially improving operational capabilities. Military personnel and civilian staff may experience improved IT infrastructure and support. The contract supports the broader defense mission by ensuring robust and efficient technological systems. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within areas where the Army operates or manages its IT infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's track record on this particular award.
The long duration could lead to scope creep if not managed effectively, potentially increasing costs beyond initial projections.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive and cost-effective process.
Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established contractor with significant experience in government IT services.
The contract addresses a critical need for computer systems design within the Department of the Army.

Sector Analysis

The Computer Systems Design Services sector is a vital component of the IT industry, supporting government and commercial entities in developing, implementing, and managing complex technological infrastructures. This contract falls within a broad category of IT services that are essential for modern defense operations. Spending in this sector is consistently high across federal agencies, reflecting the ongoing need for advanced technological solutions to maintain operational readiness and cybersecurity. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale IT service contracts awarded to major defense contractors.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor is there an indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary contract was likely awarded to a large business capable of handling the scope and complexity of the services. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Booz Allen Hamilton engages small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS-NG. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense IT Services
Computer Systems Design Contracts
Army IT Modernization Programs
Federal IT Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep or technological obsolescence.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.7 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-09. End: 2010-05-15.

What specific computer systems design services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Computer Systems Design Services' (NAICS code 541512) awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. by the Department of the Army. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts can encompass a wide range of activities including system analysis, design, integration, and development of computer systems. This could involve hardware and software integration, network design, cybersecurity architecture, and the development of custom software solutions tailored to the Army's operational requirements. Without further documentation, the precise scope remains general.

How does the $29.7 million award compare to similar computer systems design contracts within the Department of Defense?

Comparing this $29.7 million award requires context regarding the contract's duration and specific deliverables. The contract spans from May 2005 to May 2010 (1832 days), averaging approximately $16,200 per day. Large-scale IT services contracts within the DoD can range from millions to billions of dollars, depending on complexity, duration, and scope. Booz Allen Hamilton is a major contractor in this space, and this award appears to be a significant, but not exceptionally large, contract for a five-year period for specialized systems design. Benchmarking would involve looking at other multi-year, full-and-open competed IT design contracts awarded around the same period to similar large defense contractors.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. In a typical government contract for computer systems design, KPIs would be established to measure the contractor's performance against defined objectives. These could include metrics related to system functionality, performance efficiency, adherence to project timelines, budget management, cybersecurity compliance, and user satisfaction. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it impossible to assess the contractor's success or the overall effectiveness of the delivered systems.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of the Army for similar IT services?

Booz Allen Hamilton has a long-standing and extensive track record of providing IT and management consulting services to the Department of Defense, including the Department of the Army. They are a major incumbent contractor across numerous IT and systems engineering programs. While this specific contract award is from 2005-2010, the company has consistently secured large contracts for similar services throughout different administrations and technological shifts. Their historical performance with the Army generally involves large, complex projects, often awarded through competitive processes, though like any large contractor, they have faced scrutiny and reviews on specific contracts over the years.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract at the time of award or during its performance?

The provided data does not explicitly list risks or challenges associated with this specific contract. However, for a contract of this nature and duration (five years, $29.7M for systems design), potential risks common in government IT projects could include technological obsolescence, evolving security threats, integration complexities with existing systems, contractor performance issues, and budget fluctuations. The fact that it was competed under 'full and open' suggests the agency sought to mitigate risks by allowing broad participation. Without specific contract documentation or post-award reviews, identifying concrete risks is speculative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR # 700, MC LEAN, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0306J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline