DoD Awards $32.3M for Construction Services, Full and Open Competition Used
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,267,362 ($32.3M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-06-03
End Date: 2012-03-01
Contract Duration: 1,002 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 32
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: MOBILIZATION, DEMOBILIZATION,
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.3 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: MOBILIZATION, DEMOBILIZATION, Key points: 1. Significant contract value for construction services. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market access. 3. Risk appears moderate given the fixed-price nature and established sector. 4. Spending falls within the broad 'Construction' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $32.3M is substantial for mobilization/demobilization services. Without specific benchmarks for similar projects, a precise value assessment is difficult, but it appears to be a significant investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of 'Full and Open Competition' is a positive indicator for price discovery, allowing multiple vendors to bid. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to limited or sole-source approaches.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently, though the final price reflects market conditions and project scope.
Public Impact
Supports infrastructure development and maintenance through construction services. Engages the commercial construction industry, potentially creating jobs. Ensures readiness and operational capability for military installations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on 'Domestic Awardees' limits transparency.
- Mobilization/Demobilization scope could be broad and require careful management.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes fairness and potential cost savings.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on infrastructure needs and economic conditions. DoD construction contracts are a significant component of federal spending in this area.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses participated in or were awarded portions of this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business impact.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. Standard oversight mechanisms for federal contracts would apply, focusing on performance, cost, and compliance.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific awardee information.
- Broad service description ('mobilization, demobilization').
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
- Limited insight into small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.3 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). MOBILIZATION, DEMOBILIZATION,
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-06-03. End: 2012-03-01.
What specific construction services were included under 'mobilization and demobilization'?
The terms 'mobilization' and 'demobilization' in a construction context typically refer to the costs and activities associated with preparing a site for work (mobilization) and then removing equipment, personnel, and restoring the site upon completion (demobilization). This could encompass temporary facilities, site preparation, equipment transport, and final cleanup, depending on the project's specific requirements.
How did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value was achieved for $32.3M?
Full and open competition allows any interested and qualified vendor to submit a bid, fostering a competitive environment. The Department of the Army would have evaluated these bids based on pre-defined criteria, which typically include price, technical approach, past performance, and other factors, to select the offer that represented the best overall value to the government.
What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for construction mobilization/demobilization?
While firm fixed-price contracts offer cost certainty, risks include potential contractor underestimation of costs, leading to reduced quality or disputes, or overestimation, resulting in a higher price for the government. For mobilization/demobilization, unforeseen site conditions or extended timelines could strain the fixed price if not adequately accounted for in the initial bid.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM09R0047
Offers Received: 32
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,267,362
Exercised Options: $32,267,362
Current Obligation: $32,267,362
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-06-03
Current End Date: 2012-03-01
Potential End Date: 2012-03-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)