Army Awards $27.3M for Barracks Construction to Undisclosed Foreign Awardees
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,292,480 ($27.3M)
Contractor: Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-02-09
End Date: 2012-03-07
Contract Duration: 1,122 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT BARRACKS BLDGS (2)
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.3 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: CONSTRUCT BARRACKS BLDGS (2) Key points: 1. Significant contract value for building construction. 2. Competition details are obscured due to undisclosed foreign awardees. 3. Potential risks associated with foreign contractors and lack of transparency. 4. Construction sector spending, with specific focus on institutional buildings.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $27.3 million for two barracks buildings appears substantial. Without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the lack of transparency regarding awardees raises concerns about potential overpricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which theoretically allows for the best price discovery. However, the subsequent awarding to undisclosed foreign entities obscures the competitive landscape and makes it difficult to verify if the best value was truly achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of taxpayer funds for construction projects, especially with opaque awardee details, necessitates robust oversight to ensure efficiency and prevent potential misuse.
Public Impact
Taxpayer funds are being used for military infrastructure development. The lack of transparency in awardee selection raises questions about accountability. Potential impact on domestic construction industry if foreign firms are consistently favored without clear justification.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Undisclosed foreign awardees
- Lack of transparency in competition details
- Potential for cost overruns due to unclear scope or contractor issues
Positive Signals
- Construction of essential military barracks
- Awarded under full and open competition
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the commercial and institutional building construction sector. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and infrastructure. Benchmarks for similar barracks construction projects would be needed for a more precise cost analysis.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not explicitly involved in this contract, as it was awarded to foreign entities. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'undisclosed foreign awardees' is a significant red flag for oversight. Robust mechanisms should be in place to ensure due diligence, performance monitoring, and accountability for all contractors, especially those operating internationally.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Undisclosed foreign awardees
- Lack of transparency in competition details
- Potential for reduced oversight and accountability
- Difficulty in verifying contractor qualifications and performance
- Potential impact on domestic industry competitiveness
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.3 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). CONSTRUCT BARRACKS BLDGS (2)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-02-09. End: 2012-03-07.
What specific criteria were used to select the undisclosed foreign awardees, and how was their technical capability and financial stability assessed?
The provided data does not specify the criteria for selecting the undisclosed foreign awardees. Typically, agencies assess technical proposals, past performance, and financial capacity. The lack of disclosure here prevents an evaluation of whether these assessments were thorough and if they aligned with the project's requirements and taxpayer value.
What are the potential risks associated with using undisclosed foreign contractors for construction projects, particularly regarding quality control and security?
Using undisclosed foreign contractors can introduce risks related to quality assurance, adherence to local building codes, and security protocols. It can also complicate dispute resolution and make it harder to enforce contract terms. Transparency in awardee selection is crucial for mitigating these risks and ensuring project success.
How does the final contract price compare to the initial bid or estimated cost, and what factors contributed to any variance?
The data does not provide information on the initial bid or estimated cost, nor does it detail any variances. A firm fixed-price contract suggests the price was set upfront. However, without comparative data, it's impossible to assess if the final price represents good value or if unforeseen issues led to cost adjustments.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM09R0032
Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,292,480
Exercised Options: $27,292,480
Current Obligation: $27,292,480
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-02-09
Current End Date: 2012-03-07
Potential End Date: 2012-03-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
- Supply of Fuel to Various Locations in Afghanistan — $889.5M (Department of Defense)
- A-Temp ANP Award — $444.1M (Department of Defense)
- Supply of Fuel to Bagram AIR Field, Afghanistant — $289.5M (Department of Defense)
- Delivery of Fuel in Afghanistan — $237.0M (Department of Defense)
- Turbine Fuel for Forward Operating Base (FOB) Sharana — $204.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)