DoD's $41.6M Barracks Construction Contract Awarded Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $41,569,055 ($41.6M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-08-07
End Date: 2011-01-13
Contract Duration: 889 days
Daily Burn Rate: $46.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BARRACKS TYPE B
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $41.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: BARRACKS TYPE B Key points: 1. The Department of Defense awarded a $41.6 million contract for barracks construction. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a broad search for bidders. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a significant area of government spending. 5. The contract duration was 889 days, suggesting a substantial construction project.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $41.6 million for barracks construction appears within a reasonable range for large-scale building projects. However, without specific details on the scope, size, and location of the barracks, a precise comparison to similar contracts is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This method suggests that while the competition was broad, certain sources were initially excluded, potentially impacting the range of bids received and the final price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by encouraging a wide range of offers. However, the exclusion of sources warrants scrutiny to ensure it did not limit competitive pressure.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded the construction of military barracks, essential for troop housing and readiness. The contract supported the construction industry, potentially creating jobs in the commercial and institutional building sector. The project's success impacts the quality of life and living conditions for service members.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on awardees and project scope.
- Potential impact of 'exclusion of sources' on competition.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to contractor.
- Full and open competition was utilized.
- Contract awarded by the Department of Defense.
Sector Analysis
The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is a major area of government expenditure. Spending benchmarks for barracks construction vary widely based on location, size, and amenities, making direct comparisons challenging without more project specifics.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this contract, as the 'sb' field is false and no specific small business set-aside information is provided. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army awarded this contract, implying oversight from within the Department of Defense. The 'definitive contract' type suggests a standard procurement process, but specific oversight mechanisms and accountability measures are not detailed in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed project scope and location.
- Ambiguity in 'exclusion of sources' rationale.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting.
- Limited insight into specific oversight and quality assurance processes.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $41.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). BARRACKS TYPE B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $41.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-08-07. End: 2011-01-13.
What was the specific scope and location of the barracks construction to better assess value for money?
The provided data lacks specific details regarding the scope, size, and geographical location of the barracks construction project. Understanding these elements is crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. Factors like the number of units, square footage, and regional construction costs significantly influence the overall price and would allow for a more accurate comparison against industry benchmarks and similar government contracts.
What was the rationale behind excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method?
The rationale behind excluding specific sources in a 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement is typically to ensure that only qualified and capable vendors participate, or to comply with specific regulatory requirements. Without further documentation, it's unclear if this exclusion was based on pre-qualification criteria, past performance, or other factors. Understanding this rationale is key to assessing whether the exclusion potentially limited competition and impacted price discovery.
What mechanisms were in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of the constructed barracks?
The provided data does not detail the specific mechanisms in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of the constructed barracks. Typically, such oversight involves detailed inspection schedules, quality assurance plans, performance metrics, and post-occupancy evaluations. The 'definitive contract' and 'firm fixed price' nature suggest contractual obligations for quality, but the specific enforcement and monitoring procedures are not outlined here.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM08R0059
Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,569,055
Exercised Options: $41,569,055
Current Obligation: $41,569,055
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-08-07
Current End Date: 2011-01-13
Potential End Date: 2011-01-13 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)