DoD's $13.8M Logistics Depot Construction Contract Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,802,867 ($13.8M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-07-13
End Date: 2009-12-14
Contract Duration: 519 days
Daily Burn Rate: $26.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 30
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCTION CLASS II IV VII LOGISTICS DEPOT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: CONSTRUCTION CLASS II IV VII LOGISTICS DEPOT Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction services, indicating a need for facility expansion or modernization. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers risk to the contractor for cost overruns. 4. A duration of 519 days points to a significant construction project timeline. 5. The awardee is listed as 'Domestic Awardees (Undisclosed)', limiting transparency on specific contractor selection. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 identifies the sector as Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.8 million for a logistics depot construction project appears within a reasonable range for such undertakings, though specific benchmarks are difficult without detailed project scope. The Firm Fixed Price contract type is standard for construction, aiming to control costs. However, the lack of disclosed awardee information prevents a direct comparison of pricing against similar contractors or market rates for this specific project.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding process. The data does not specify the number of bidders, which would provide further insight into the level of competition. A high number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation from multiple contractors.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Army, receiving upgraded or new logistics facilities. The services delivered are construction of a logistics depot, crucial for supply chain management and operational readiness. The geographic impact is likely within a domestic U.S. location where the depot is situated. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and project managers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of disclosed awardee information hinders assessment of contractor's past performance and potential risks.
- Limited detail on the specific scope of construction makes it difficult to fully evaluate value for money.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220). This sector encompasses the construction of a wide range of non-residential buildings. Federal spending in construction is often driven by infrastructure needs, facility modernization, and operational support requirements across various agencies. Benchmarking this specific $13.8 million contract would require comparison to similar-sized logistics or industrial facility construction projects undertaken by the government or private sector.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without specific set-aside goals or reporting, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on small businesses for this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and relevant project managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which places cost responsibility on the contractor. Transparency is limited by the undisclosed awardee information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Logistics and Supply Chain Management
- Department of Defense Facilities
- Construction Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Undisclosed Awardee
- Lack of Bid Count Data
- Limited Scope Detail
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, logistics-depot, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, domestic
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). CONSTRUCTION CLASS II IV VII LOGISTICS DEPOT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-07-13. End: 2009-12-14.
What is the specific scope of work for this logistics depot construction project?
The provided data identifies the contract as 'CONSTRUCTION CLASS II IV VII LOGISTICS DEPOT' and assigns NAICS code 236220 for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. However, the specific scope of work, such as the size of the depot, the type of construction (e.g., new build, renovation), and the specific facilities to be included (e.g., warehousing, administrative offices, maintenance bays), is not detailed in the provided data. This level of detail is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the project's requirements and for accurate cost benchmarking.
How many bids were received for this full and open competition?
The data indicates that the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' which implies that multiple companies were eligible to bid. However, the specific number of bids received is not provided in the data. Knowing the number of bidders is important for assessing the intensity of the competition. A higher number of bids generally suggests a more competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing for the government and indicate a stronger market interest in the contract opportunity.
What is the track record of the undisclosed domestic awardee(s) for similar construction projects?
The awardee information is listed as 'DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED),' which prevents any assessment of their track record. Without knowing the specific contractor(s) or company names, it is impossible to review their past performance on similar logistics depot construction projects, their financial stability, or their history of meeting deadlines and quality standards. This lack of transparency limits the ability to evaluate the contractor's reliability and potential risks associated with their performance.
How does the $13.8 million contract value compare to similar logistics depot construction projects?
The contract value of $13.8 million for a logistics depot construction project is a significant investment. However, without specific details on the project's scope, size, location, and complexity, it is challenging to provide a precise comparison to similar projects. Factors such as square footage, specialized storage requirements (e.g., climate control, hazardous materials), and site preparation needs can greatly influence costs. A direct benchmark would require access to detailed project specifications and data on comparable government or private sector construction projects of similar scale and function.
What are the potential risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price contract for this construction project?
A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, like the one awarded here, shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. For the government, the primary benefit is cost certainty. However, potential risks for the contractor include underestimating costs, which could lead to financial strain or pressure to cut corners on quality if not adequately overseen. For the government, risks can arise if the contractor's bid was unrealistically low, potentially impacting project quality or completion, or if scope creep occurs without proper change order management.
What is the historical spending pattern for logistics depot construction by the Department of the Army?
The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns for logistics depot construction by the Department of the Army. To analyze historical spending, one would need access to broader contract databases covering multiple years and various awards related to logistics facilities. Such an analysis would reveal trends in contract values, types of construction, competition levels, and the agencies or commands most frequently awarding these types of contracts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM08R0068
Offers Received: 30
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,802,867
Exercised Options: $13,802,867
Current Obligation: $13,802,867
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-07-13
Current End Date: 2009-12-14
Potential End Date: 2009-12-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)