DoD's $19.7M Power System Contract Awarded Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,761,693 ($19.8M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2009-05-11
Contract Duration: 954 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: POWER SYSTEM
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: POWER SYSTEM Key points: 1. The contract for a power system was awarded by the Department of the Army. 2. It was procured using full and open competition, indicating a broad market approach. 3. The contract value is $19.7 million, with a duration of 954 days. 4. The specific awardee is undisclosed, limiting transparency on competition dynamics.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $19.7 million for a power system over approximately 2.5 years appears moderate. Without specific details on the system's capabilities or comparable market prices, a precise valuation is difficult. However, the duration suggests a substantial project.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition suggests that multiple vendors were allowed to bid, promoting a competitive environment. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process likely resulted in a fair market price, maximizing taxpayer value for the power system procured.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense's investment in a power system highlights critical infrastructure needs. The undisclosed domestic awardee raises questions about transparency and potential concentration of contracts. The project's duration and value indicate a significant undertaking with potential long-term operational impacts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Undisclosed awardee limits transparency.
- Lack of specific performance metrics.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term projects.
Positive Signals
- Procured under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract type.
- Domestic awardee ensures U.S. economic benefit.
Sector Analysis
The procurement falls under commercial and institutional building construction, specifically related to power systems. Spending in this sector is crucial for maintaining operational capabilities for government facilities, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and technology.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the awardee is a domestic entity, but does not specify if it is a small business. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the impact on small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. Oversight would typically involve contract management offices ensuring performance and adherence to terms, but specific oversight details are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Undisclosed awardee.
- Lack of detailed technical specifications.
- Potential for scope creep in long-duration contracts.
- Limited information on contractor past performance.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). POWER SYSTEM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2009-05-11.
What was the specific nature and scope of the power system procured, and how does its cost compare to similar systems in the market?
The provided data lacks specifics on the power system's technical specifications, capabilities, or intended use. Therefore, a direct comparison to market benchmarks for similar systems is not feasible. The contract value of $19.7 million over 954 days suggests a significant installation or upgrade, but without further details, its cost-effectiveness remains difficult to ascertain.
What are the potential risks associated with an undisclosed awardee for a significant infrastructure project like a power system?
An undisclosed awardee poses risks related to transparency and accountability. It can obscure potential conflicts of interest, limit the ability to assess the contractor's past performance or financial stability, and make it harder to verify fair competition. This lack of transparency can also hinder public trust and oversight efforts.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value for taxpayers, given the undisclosed awardee?
While 'full and open competition' is designed to foster the best value, the undisclosed nature of the awardee limits our ability to fully assess its effectiveness. It suggests a competitive process occurred, but without knowing who bid and the final selection rationale, we cannot definitively confirm optimal price discovery or the selection of the most capable vendor at the best price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM06R0084
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,749,463
Exercised Options: $19,761,693
Current Obligation: $19,761,693
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2009-05-11
Potential End Date: 2009-05-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)