Department of the Army awarded $11.6M contract for administrative and management consulting services to ROGERCO, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,680,818 ($11.7M)

Contractor: Rogerco, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-04-29

End Date: 2011-07-31

Contract Duration: 2,284 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAS::21 2020::TAS 200509!500416!2100!W9133L!NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, CNTRCTNG !GS10F0168P !C!N! !N!W9133L05F0100! !20050429!20060430!002926058!002926058!086352689!N!EWA INFORMATION&INFRASTRUCTU!13873 PARK CENTER RD STE 5!HERNDON !VA!20171!36648!059!51!HERNDON !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001622847!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to ROGERCO, INC. for work described as: TAS::21 2020::TAS 200509!500416!2100!W9133L!NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, CNTRCTNG !GS10F0168P !C!N! !N!W9133L05F0100! !20050429!20060430!002926058!002926058!086352689!N!EWA INFORMATION&INFRASTRUCTU!13873 PARK CENTER RD STE 5!HERNDON !VA!20171!36648!059!51!HERNDON … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is over 6 years. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army. 5. The contractor is ROGERCO, INC. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price. 7. The place of performance is Virginia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of this contract is $11.6 million over a period of more than 6 years. Without specific benchmarks for similar consulting services from the Department of the Army or other agencies, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration suggests a sustained need for these services. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract shifts some risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer. The competitive nature suggests that pricing was likely scrutinized.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing and the selection of a contractor based on merit and value, rather than a sole-source award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Army, which receives administrative management and general management consulting services. These services are crucial for the efficient operation and strategic planning of military and administrative functions. The contract's place of performance is Virginia, potentially impacting the local economy through employment and business activity. The specific workforce implications are not detailed but could involve the deployment of specialized consulting expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes makes it hard to gauge effectiveness.
The long duration could lead to potential cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Limited transparency on the specific nature of consulting services provided.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty.
Contractor has a track record, though details of past performance are not provided here.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management consulting. This sector is vital for government operations, providing expertise in areas like organizational efficiency, strategic planning, and administrative process improvement. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar large-scale consulting engagements within the federal government would require access to more detailed service descriptions and pricing data.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless ROGERCO, INC. voluntarily engages small business subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency could be enhanced by publicizing detailed performance reports and service outcomes.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to scope creep or misalignment with evolving needs.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes assessing value difficult.
Potential for contractor lock-in over an extended period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to ROGERCO, INC.. TAS::21 2020::TAS 200509!500416!2100!W9133L!NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, CNTRCTNG !GS10F0168P !C!N! !N!W9133L05F0100! !20050429!20060430!002926058!002926058!086352689!N!EWA INFORMATION&INFRASTRUCTU!13873 PARK CENTER RD STE 5!HERNDON !VA!20171!36648!059!51!HERNDON !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001622847!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541618!E!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROGERCO, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-04-29. End: 2011-07-31.

What specific types of administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The contract description 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541611) suggests a broad range of support. This could include areas such as organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, policy development, human capital management consulting, and operational efficiency assessments. Without further details from the contract award or performance reports, the precise nature of the services remains general. These services are typically aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the client organization's operations and management functions.

How does the $11.6 million contract value compare to similar consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing the $11.6 million contract value requires a detailed analysis of similar contracts for administrative and management consulting services awarded by the Department of Defense (DoD) over comparable timeframes and durations. The provided data indicates a contract duration of over 6 years. Larger, multi-year consulting engagements for major federal agencies can range from several million to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, complexity, and duration. To assess if $11.6 million is high or low, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar service descriptions (e.g., strategic planning, organizational reform, IT management consulting) and similar contract types (e.g., Firm Fixed Price). The fact that it was competitively procured suggests the pricing was deemed reasonable within that context.

What is the track record of ROGERCO, INC. in performing federal contracts, particularly for the Department of the Army?

The provided data indicates that ROGERCO, INC. was awarded this specific contract. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance history with federal agencies, including the Department of the Army. This would involve looking at previous contract awards, their values, durations, and crucially, their performance ratings and any past performance issues or successes. A comprehensive review would also consider the types of services they have previously delivered and their success in meeting contract requirements and objectives. Without access to a federal contractor performance database or specific past performance evaluations for ROGERCO, INC., a detailed assessment of their track record is not possible from this data alone.

What are the potential risks associated with a long-term (over 6 years) consulting contract of this magnitude?

Long-term consulting contracts, such as this one exceeding six years, carry several potential risks. Firstly, the scope of work may become outdated or misaligned with evolving organizational needs over such an extended period, potentially leading to inefficiencies or the need for costly contract modifications. Secondly, there's a risk of 'contractor lock-in,' where the agency becomes overly reliant on the contractor, diminishing internal capabilities. Thirdly, managing performance and ensuring continued value delivery over many years can be challenging for the government oversight team. Finally, unforeseen economic shifts or changes in agency priorities could render the services less critical, yet the contract remains in effect, potentially leading to underutilization or perceived waste.

How does the 'full and open competition' award mechanism impact the cost-effectiveness for taxpayers?

Awarding contracts through 'full and open competition' generally enhances cost-effectiveness for taxpayers. This process requires that all responsible sources are permitted to submit a bid or proposal, fostering a competitive environment. Competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie to offer the most attractive bid to win the contract. It also allows the government to select the offer that provides the best overall value, which may include factors beyond just price, such as technical approach, past performance, and management plan. This contrasts with sole-source or limited competition scenarios, where the lack of robust competition can lead to higher prices and potentially less optimal solutions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Electronic Warfare Associates, Inc.

Address: 13873 PK CTR RD STE 200, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0168P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline