Booz Allen Hamilton contract for program review and development services awarded at over $14.4 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,415,499 ($14.4M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-03-30

End Date: 2009-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200408!000563!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W912SU04F0013! !20040330!20040930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001395168!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT MONROE, HAMPTON (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 23651

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200408!000563!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W912SU04F0013! !20040330!20040930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program review and development services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract is over 5 years, implying a long-term need for these services. 4. The contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, is a well-established firm with significant experience in government contracting. 5. The services provided fall under computer systems design, a critical area for government operations. 6. The contract value suggests a significant investment in program analysis and improvement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $14.4 million over five years appears reasonable for specialized program review and development services, especially considering the contractor's established reputation. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management and consulting services within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope and cost, which can be advantageous.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of award suggests a healthy level of interest from qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced program review and development capabilities. Services delivered likely include strategic planning, process improvement, and system analysis. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency receiving the services, likely supporting national defense initiatives. Workforce implications may involve the utilization of Booz Allen Hamilton's specialized consultants to augment government staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if program objectives are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single large contractor may limit flexibility in adapting to changing needs.
Ensuring adequate performance metrics are in place to track progress and value.

Positive Signals

Award to a reputable contractor with a proven track record.
Full and open competition suggests a fair and transparent procurement process.
Long contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for deep integration of services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically in computer systems design and related services. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for these services is competitive, with many firms offering expertise in program management, analysis, and IT solutions. The contract value is moderate within this sector, reflecting a focused scope of work.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, small businesses were likely not directly involved as prime contractors. However, there may be opportunities for small businesses to subcontract with Booz Allen Hamilton, depending on the specific requirements and the contractor's subcontracting plan. The absence of a small business set-aside means the primary focus was on obtaining the best value from the broader market.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Army. Performance reviews, regular reporting, and milestone tracking are standard accountability measures. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
IT Professional Services
Program Management Support
Systems Engineering Services
Defense Agency Support Services

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Contract Value
Contractor Reputation
Competition Level

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200408!000563!2100!W912SU!ACA, NRCC - MISSION DIVISION !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W912SU04F0013! !20040330!20040930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000001395168!N!N!000000000000!R409!PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-03-30. End: 2009-03-31.

What specific program review and development activities were undertaken by Booz Allen Hamilton under this contract?

The contract, awarded under NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services), focused on 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES'. While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such services typically involve analyzing existing programs for efficiency and effectiveness, identifying areas for improvement, developing new program strategies, and potentially assisting in the implementation of recommended changes. This could include process re-engineering, strategic planning support, organizational analysis, and the development of new operational frameworks or technological solutions to meet program objectives. The duration of over five years suggests a comprehensive and ongoing engagement rather than a short-term project.

How does the awarded amount of $14.4 million compare to similar contracts for program review and development services?

The awarded amount of $14,415,498.77 for approximately five years of service places this contract in the mid-to-high range for specialized program review and development. Without specific details on the scope and complexity of services rendered, a direct comparison is challenging. However, contracts of this nature, especially those involving large defense agencies like the Department of the Army, often range from several million to tens of millions of dollars. Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, established contractor, and their pricing often reflects significant expertise and overhead. Further analysis would require benchmarking against contracts with similar objectives, durations, and agency types.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. However, for 'PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,' typical KPIs would likely revolve around the successful identification of cost savings or efficiency improvements, the development of actionable strategic plans, the timely completion of analysis phases, and the successful implementation or adoption of recommended changes. Client satisfaction surveys and adherence to budget and schedule for any sub-projects initiated under this contract would also be common metrics. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these aspects.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of Defense and similar contracts?

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. has a long and extensive history of contracting with the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies. They are a major player in providing a wide range of services, including management consulting, IT solutions, cybersecurity, and systems engineering. Their track record with the DoD is substantial, encompassing numerous large and complex contracts across various branches and agencies. This specific contract, awarded in 2004, aligns with their core competencies. Their consistent presence and significant contract awards suggest a generally positive track record, though like any large contractor, they would have faced scrutiny and performance reviews on individual contracts.

Were there any significant risks identified or mitigation strategies employed for this contract?

The provided data does not detail specific risks identified or mitigation strategies for this contract. However, common risks associated with large consulting and program development contracts include scope creep, contractor performance issues, budget overruns (though less likely with firm-fixed-price), and challenges in integrating recommendations. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, the primary risk to the government is potentially receiving less value than anticipated if performance is subpar. Risks to the contractor include underestimating the effort required. Mitigation would typically involve robust contract management, clear statement of work, regular progress reviews, and strong communication channels.

How has federal spending on computer systems design services (NAICS 541512) evolved since this contract was awarded?

Federal spending on Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512) has seen significant growth since this contract was awarded in 2004. The increasing reliance on technology across all government functions, coupled with evolving cybersecurity threats and the push for digital transformation, has driven substantial investment in this sector. Spending in this category has generally trended upwards, with notable increases during periods of heightened national security concerns and major IT modernization initiatives. While specific year-over-year figures fluctuate based on agency budgets and priorities, the overall trajectory indicates a sustained and growing demand for these services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR # 700, MC LEAN, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,467,110

Exercised Options: $9,467,110

Current Obligation: $14,415,499

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0306J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline