DoD Awards $4.2M for Tent City Facilities Support to TWO-TAC LLC, No Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,228,602 ($4.2M)
Contractor: Two-Tac LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-09-13
End Date: 2026-01-07
Contract Duration: 116 days
Daily Burn Rate: $36.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TENT CITY
Place of Performance
Location: NAVAL ANACOST ANNEX, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20373
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $4.2 million to TWO-TAC LLC for work described as: TENT CITY Key points: 1. Significant award value for facilities support services. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery. 3. Contract awarded to a single entity without a competitive process. 4. Services fall under facilities support, a broad category.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $4.2M for 116 days of support is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is fair and reasonable compared to market rates for similar facilities support services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on this $4.2M contract means taxpayers may not have received the best possible value, as prices were not driven down by multiple bids.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The "tent city" designation suggests a potentially temporary or emergency need, raising questions about long-term planning and cost-effectiveness. Lack of transparency in the award process hinders public understanding of government spending.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- No competition
- High value for short duration
- Potential for inflated pricing
Positive Signals
- Clear contract award
- Defined scope of services
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of services. Government spending in this area can vary significantly based on the specific needs, location, and duration. This award represents a notable investment for a short period.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business, and the lack of competition further suggests that small businesses were not considered or given an opportunity to bid.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Oversight should focus on the justification for not competing the contract and ensuring the price paid is indeed reasonable despite the lack of competitive pressure.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- Limited transparency
- Unclear long-term strategy
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, dc, definitive-contract, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $4.2 million to TWO-TAC LLC. TENT CITY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TWO-TAC LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-13. End: 2026-01-07.
What is the specific justification for awarding this $4.2M contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure the price is fair and reasonable?
The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies must provide documentation demonstrating that only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's needs. Without this documentation, it's impossible to verify if the price paid is fair and reasonable, as market forces were absent.
Given the "tent city" designation and the short contract duration, what is the long-term strategy and cost-effectiveness of this approach compared to more permanent solutions?
The use of temporary structures like 'tent cities' often implies an urgent or short-term need. However, the significant investment of $4.2M raises questions about the overall cost-effectiveness. A thorough analysis comparing this expenditure to the costs and benefits of more permanent infrastructure solutions would be necessary to determine the long-term value.
How does the $4.2M award for 116 days of facilities support compare to industry benchmarks for similar services, especially considering the lack of competitive bidding?
Benchmarking this contract's cost against industry standards is challenging due to the sole-source nature. Typically, competitive bidding drives prices down. Without this pressure, the $4.2M for 116 days could be significantly higher than what might have been achieved through a competitive process. Further analysis of specific service components is needed.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: LEASE/RENT EQUIPMENT › LEASE OR RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9204 VENTURE CT, MANASSAS PARK, VA, 20111
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,569,207
Exercised Options: $4,569,207
Current Obligation: $4,228,602
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-13
Current End Date: 2026-01-07
Potential End Date: 2026-01-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-13
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)