DoD's $3.2M Collective Training Barracks Project in California Awarded to The Mason & Hanger Group Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,208,447 ($3.2M)

Contractor: THE Mason & Hanger Group Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-19

End Date: 2030-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,294 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: COLLECTIVE TRAINING ENLISTED BARRACKS PRFT, CA

Place of Performance

Location: DUBLIN, ALAMEDA County, CALIFORNIA, 94568

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $3.2 million to THE MASON & HANGER GROUP INC. for work described as: COLLECTIVE TRAINING ENLISTED BARRACKS PRFT, CA Key points: 1. Value-for-money assessment pending detailed cost breakdown and comparison to similar construction projects. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators include the long duration of the contract (over 6 years) and potential for cost overruns in large construction projects. 4. Performance context will be evaluated based on the contractor's history with similar DoD projects. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the Engineering Services sector, supporting military infrastructure. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $3,208,447.1. Benchmarking this against similar military construction projects requires access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts. The Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests the contractor has assessed costs and risks, but the long duration could still present challenges. Without specific cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry standards for engineering services in California, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult at this stage.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of two bidders suggests a degree of competition, but the exact number of proposals received and their relative competitiveness are not detailed. A robust competition typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the enlisted personnel who will utilize the new barracks, improving their living conditions. The project delivers essential infrastructure for collective training facilities. The geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation in California where the barracks will be constructed. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers, engineers, and support staff in the local California economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 6 years) increases the potential for scope creep and cost escalation if not managed tightly.
Firm Fixed Price contracts can lead to contractor pressure to cut corners on quality if not adequately overseen.
Dependence on a single contractor for a multi-year project can create risks if the contractor experiences financial or operational difficulties.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor, potentially protecting the government from unforeseen expenses.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, which can lead to better pricing and value.
The contractor, The Mason & Hanger Group Inc., likely has experience with similar government projects, implying a degree of familiarity with requirements and processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting military construction and infrastructure development. The market for military construction is substantial, driven by ongoing modernization and maintenance needs of defense facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale construction and renovation projects for military housing and training facilities across different branches of the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if The Mason & Hanger Group Inc. chooses to engage them. The extent of subcontracting will depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the work required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and relevant project managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which penalizes the contractor for cost overruns. Transparency can be assessed through contract award databases and performance reports, though detailed project-specific oversight information may be limited.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction Program
Enlisted Barracks Modernization
Department of Defense Facilities Engineering
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration
Potential for cost escalation in construction
Firm Fixed Price risk management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $3.2 million to THE MASON & HANGER GROUP INC.. COLLECTIVE TRAINING ENLISTED BARRACKS PRFT, CA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE MASON & HANGER GROUP INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-19. End: 2030-12-31.

What is the track record of The Mason & Hanger Group Inc. with Department of Defense construction contracts, particularly those involving barracks or similar living facilities?

Assessing the track record of The Mason & Hanger Group Inc. requires a review of their past performance on similar Department of Defense (DoD) contracts. Key indicators would include on-time and on-budget completion rates, quality of work, and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or contractor performance assessment reporting (CPARS) would be crucial. For instance, if they have successfully delivered multiple barracks projects within scope and budget, it suggests a lower risk profile for this current award. Conversely, a history of significant delays, cost overruns, or quality issues on comparable projects would raise concerns about their capacity to execute this $3.2 million contract effectively over its multi-year duration.

How does the $3.2 million award for collective training enlisted barracks compare to the average cost of similar construction projects within the Department of the Army?

To benchmark the $3.2 million award, we need to compare it against the average cost per square foot or per bed for similar enlisted barracks construction projects undertaken by the Department of the Army. This comparison should account for factors such as location (California can have higher construction costs), project scope (e.g., amenities, size of rooms), and the specific year of award. Without access to a detailed cost breakdown for this specific project and a database of comparable Army barracks projects, it's challenging to definitively state if this award represents good value. However, if similar projects in California typically cost more per unit, this award might be considered competitive. Conversely, if it appears significantly higher than average, further scrutiny into the project's unique requirements or potential inefficiencies would be warranted.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this specific contract, considering its duration and scope?

The primary risk indicators for this contract include its extended duration of approximately 6.5 years (from September 2024 to December 2030), which increases the potential for unforeseen cost increases due to inflation, changes in material costs, or evolving regulatory requirements. As a Firm Fixed Price contract, the risk of cost overruns is primarily borne by the contractor, but this can incentivize them to cut corners on quality or safety if not adequately monitored. Furthermore, large-scale construction projects inherently carry risks related to site conditions, labor availability, and supply chain disruptions. The specific nature of 'collective training enlisted barracks' might also involve unique design or functional requirements that could introduce complexity and risk if not precisely defined and executed.

How effective are the oversight mechanisms for ensuring the successful completion and quality of this barracks construction project?

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or a designated project management office within the Department of the Army. Standard oversight mechanisms include regular site inspections, progress reviews, quality assurance checks, and adherence to the contract's specifications and performance standards. The Firm Fixed Price nature of the contract means that deviations from the agreed-upon scope or quality standards could lead to penalties or non-payment for the contractor. Transparency is typically facilitated through contract award databases and potentially through public affairs releases regarding major infrastructure projects. However, the day-to-day effectiveness of oversight depends heavily on the diligence and resources allocated by the contracting officer's representative (COR) and the project team.

What are the historical spending patterns for collective training facilities or enlisted barracks within the Department of Defense over the past five years?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for collective training facilities and enlisted barracks within the Department of Defense (DoD) over the past five years would reveal trends in investment priorities, average project costs, and the prevalence of different contract types. This data, typically available through sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), would show the total annual expenditure on such infrastructure, the number of contracts awarded, and the average contract value. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the $3.2 million award for this specific barracks project. For example, if overall spending in this category has been increasing, it might indicate a broader push for barracks modernization. Conversely, a declining trend could suggest shifting priorities or budget constraints.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912QR23R0008

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 W VINE ST, LEXINGTON, KY, 40507

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,582,353

Exercised Options: $3,208,447

Current Obligation: $3,208,447

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912QR24D0011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline