DoD awards $56.4M for Grissom ARB airfield repairs to T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $56,448,220 ($56.4M)
Contractor: T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-05-04
End Date: 2025-01-02
Contract Duration: 974 days
Daily Burn Rate: $58.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: REPAIR AIRFIELD LIGHTING CIRCUITS / REPAIR TAXIWAY G / REPAIR OVERRUNS / REPAIR RUNWAY AND SHOULDERS / REPAIR TAXIWAY C PROJECT AT GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE, IN
Place of Performance
Location: GRISSOM ARB, MIAMI County, INDIANA, 46971
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $56.4 million to T & T CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, LLC for work described as: REPAIR AIRFIELD LIGHTING CIRCUITS / REPAIR TAXIWAY G / REPAIR OVERRUNS / REPAIR RUNWAY AND SHOULDERS / REPAIR TAXIWAY C PROJECT AT GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE, IN Key points: 1. Contract value of $56.4M for airfield infrastructure upgrades at Grissom ARB. 2. Project scope includes repairs to lighting circuits, taxiways, and runways. 3. Awarded to T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC, a relatively new entity in federal contracting. 4. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm-fixed-price structure. 5. Duration of 974 days indicates a significant, multi-year project. 6. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $56.4 million for airfield repairs appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar airfield repair contracts is difficult without more specific cost breakdowns for individual repair items. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts risk to the contractor, which can sometimes lead to higher initial bids to account for unforeseen issues. The contractor, T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC, has limited federal contract history, making a direct value comparison challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 2 bids were received. While two bids suggest some level of competition, it is on the lower end for a contract of this magnitude, potentially limiting the downward pressure on pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process, even with a limited number of bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing to secure the award.
Public Impact
Military operations at Grissom Air Reserve Base will benefit from improved airfield safety and functionality. The project will deliver essential repairs to critical airfield infrastructure, including lighting and pavement. The geographic impact is localized to Grissom ARB in Indiana. The contract is expected to create or sustain jobs in the construction sector within the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited federal contracting history for T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC raises questions about performance track record and potential execution risks.
- The relatively low number of bids (2) for a contract of this size could indicate limited market interest or contractor capacity, potentially impacting price competitiveness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, which theoretically allows for the best value to be determined.
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government once awarded.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on heavy and civil engineering construction related to airfield infrastructure. The market for airfield construction and repair is specialized, often requiring specific certifications and experience. The $56.4 million award is a significant investment in maintaining critical military assets, aligning with broader government spending on defense infrastructure modernization and readiness.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no small business subcontracting goals were explicitly mentioned. T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC, is identified as an LLC, but its size status (small or large business) is not detailed here. The lack of a small business set-aside means opportunities for small businesses to directly participate as prime contractors were limited in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices responsible for Grissom ARB. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by establishing a set cost. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed project progress and specific oversight activities may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Airfield Pavement Repair
- Military Construction
- Base Infrastructure Modernization
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Risk Flags
- Contractor Performance Risk (due to limited federal history)
- Competition Level Risk (low number of bids)
- Scope Creep Risk (potential for unforeseen conditions)
Tags
construction, defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, airfield-repair, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, definitive-contract, indiana, large-contract, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $56.4 million to T & T CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, LLC. REPAIR AIRFIELD LIGHTING CIRCUITS / REPAIR TAXIWAY G / REPAIR OVERRUNS / REPAIR RUNWAY AND SHOULDERS / REPAIR TAXIWAY C PROJECT AT GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE, IN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is T & T CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $56.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-05-04. End: 2025-01-02.
What is the track record of T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC on federal contracts?
T & T Construction Enterprises, LLC appears to have a limited track record with federal contracts based on the provided data. As a relatively new entity in the federal contracting space, assessing their past performance, ability to manage large-scale projects, and adherence to timelines and budgets is challenging. Further investigation into their contract history, including any prior awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any potential past issues or successes, would be necessary to fully evaluate their reliability and capability for this significant airfield repair project.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar airfield repair projects?
Directly comparing the $56.4 million value of this contract to similar airfield repair projects is difficult without detailed breakdowns of the specific repair items and their associated costs. Airfield repair projects can vary significantly in scope, complexity, and location, influencing their overall cost. Factors such as the extent of pavement damage, the type of lighting systems being repaired or replaced, and the specific requirements of the airbase all contribute to the final price. Benchmarking would require access to cost data for comparable projects at other military installations, considering factors like inflation, labor rates, and material costs prevalent at the time of award.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues due to the contractor's limited federal contracting history, which could lead to delays or cost overruns if not managed effectively. Another risk is the possibility of unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations impacting the fixed-price nature of the contract, although the contractor bears the primary risk here. Given the critical nature of airfield operations, any significant delays or quality issues could impact the base's readiness and operational capabilities. Ensuring robust government oversight and clear communication channels will be crucial to mitigating these risks.
How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for this type of contract?
Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for government contracts, as it theoretically maximizes the number of potential bidders and encourages competitive pricing. However, for specialized projects like airfield repair, the pool of qualified contractors might be limited. In this case, receiving only two bids suggests that while the process was open, the level of competition may not have been as robust as desired for a contract of this magnitude. This could mean that the government did not achieve the lowest possible price, although it still likely benefited from some competitive pressure compared to a sole-source award.
What is the historical spending pattern for airfield maintenance at Grissom ARB?
Historical spending patterns for airfield maintenance at Grissom ARB are not detailed in the provided data. To assess this, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded for similar services at this specific base over several fiscal years. Understanding previous investments in airfield infrastructure, the types of repairs undertaken, and the contractors involved would provide context for the current $56.4 million award. Significant fluctuations or a lack of consistent investment in the past could indicate either deferred maintenance or a strategic shift in infrastructure priorities.
What are the implications of a firm-fixed-price contract for airfield repairs?
A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract structure for airfield repairs means that the contractor agrees to perform the work for a predetermined, fixed price, regardless of the actual costs incurred. This shifts the primary financial risk to the contractor. For the government, this offers budget certainty and protection against cost overruns, assuming the initial price is competitive. However, contractors may build in higher contingency amounts into their FFP bids to account for potential risks, which could result in a higher initial price compared to other contract types. Effective management and oversight are still crucial to ensure quality and timely completion.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR22R0020
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: HZE
Contractor Details
Address: 4375 LILAC RD, LEITCHFIELD, KY, 42754
Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $57,806,269
Exercised Options: $56,448,220
Current Obligation: $56,448,220
Actual Outlays: $5,445,890
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-05-04
Current End Date: 2025-01-02
Potential End Date: 2025-01-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-15
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)