DoD's $24M Niagara Falls AFRC construction contract awarded to TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractor, Inc. in 2008
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,048,484 ($24.0M)
Contractor: TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractor, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-07-03
End Date: 2011-10-27
Contract Duration: 1,211 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: NIAGARA FALLS AFRC
Place of Performance
Location: NIAGARA FALLS, NIAGARA County, NEW YORK, 14301
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.0 million to TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC. for work described as: NIAGARA FALLS AFRC Key points: 1. Contract value of $24 million for construction services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract was a definitive contract with a firm fixed price, indicating price certainty. 4. The duration of the contract was over 1200 days, suggesting a substantial project. 5. The project was located in Niagara Falls, New York. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $24 million for a large construction project is within a typical range for such endeavors. However, without specific details on the scope of work, comparing its value-for-money is challenging. The firm fixed-price nature suggests the government aimed for cost control, but the final cost relative to the delivered value would require a detailed post-award analysis. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects of comparable size and complexity would provide a clearer picture of its economic efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically leads to a more robust selection of contractors and potentially better pricing due to market forces. The presence of multiple bidders, indicated by the 'no' field (though the value is 4, which is a low number for full and open competition), would have allowed for price discovery and selection of the most advantageous offer.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the personnel stationed at Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station (AFRC). The contract delivered construction services for facilities at the AFRC. The geographic impact is localized to Niagara Falls, New York. The project likely involved a significant number of construction workers, impacting the local labor market.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the fixed price did not adequately account for unforeseen construction challenges.
- Risk of delays impacting the operational readiness of the facility.
- Quality control concerns inherent in large-scale construction projects.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive process that could lead to better value.
- Awarded to a specific contractor (TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC.) implies a selection based on qualifications and price.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for a government facility. The construction industry is a significant part of the US economy, with government contracts forming a notable segment. Projects like this involve substantial capital investment and require specialized engineering and construction expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other military base construction or renovation projects.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC., would have had the discretion to subcontract portions of the work, and their subcontracting practices would determine any indirect impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would include adherence to the contract terms, performance standards, and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction Projects
- Department of Defense Facilities
- Air Reserve Station Infrastructure
- Commercial Building Construction Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration significantly exceeds typical project timelines, potentially indicating scope creep or delays.
- Low number of bidders (4) for a 'full and open competition' may suggest limited market interest or contractor capacity.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, niagara-falls, new-york, air-reserve-station
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.0 million to TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC.. NIAGARA FALLS AFRC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-07-03. End: 2011-10-27.
What was the specific scope of work for the construction project at Niagara Falls AFRC?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the construction project at Niagara Falls AFRC. It only indicates the contract was for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' under NAICS code 236220. To understand the scope, one would need to consult the original contract documents, which would outline the specific buildings, renovations, or infrastructure improvements undertaken. This could range from new barracks construction to upgrades of existing operational facilities or administrative buildings. Without this information, a precise assessment of the project's objectives and deliverables is not possible.
How did the final cost compare to the initial estimated cost, if available?
The provided data does not include information on the initial estimated cost or the final cost of the contract. It only shows the awarded amount of $24,048,484. For a definitive comparison, access to the contract's baseline estimate and any subsequent modifications or change orders would be necessary. Firm fixed-price contracts aim to cap costs, but variations can occur due to unforeseen circumstances or scope adjustments. Analyzing the difference between the awarded price and the final expenditure, if it deviates, would reveal the cost control effectiveness of this particular contract.
What was the track record of TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC. with similar government construction projects prior to this award?
The provided data does not contain information on the contractor's track record. To assess TCI ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/CONTRACTOR, INC.'s history with similar government construction projects, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS, which track contract awards and performance. Examining past performance reviews, the types and values of previous contracts, and any reported issues or successes would provide insight into their reliability and capability for undertaking a project of this nature for the Department of the Army.
Were there any performance issues or disputes reported during the execution of this contract?
The provided data does not include information regarding performance issues or disputes related to this contract. Such details would typically be found in contract performance reports, agency inspection records, or legal filings if disputes escalated. A thorough review of the contract's lifecycle, including any modifications, cure notices, or termination actions, would be required to identify any such problems. The absence of explicit flags in the summary data does not guarantee a flawless execution.
How does the awarded amount of $24 million compare to other construction contracts for Air Reserve Stations of similar size and scope?
Without specific details on the scope of work and the size/complexity of the Niagara Falls AFRC facility, a direct comparison of the $24 million award to other similar contracts is difficult. However, construction projects for military installations can vary widely in cost depending on factors like location, specific facility requirements (e.g., hangars, administrative buildings, training facilities), and prevailing labor and material costs. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable projects, perhaps by filtering for similar NAICS codes, agencies (e.g., other branches of the military), and contract durations, and then analyze their awarded values relative to their scope.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR07R0067
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1718 STATE RD 16, LA CROSSE, WI, 54601
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,048,484
Exercised Options: $24,048,484
Current Obligation: $24,048,484
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-07-03
Current End Date: 2011-10-27
Potential End Date: 2011-10-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-28
More Contracts from TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractor, Inc.
- C0120-Contract [112632] --- Project — $24.3M (Department of Defense)
- Vance AFB Afrc — $19.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!500585!96ce!w912es!usa Engineer District ST Paul !w912es05c0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20050425!20050930!092781848!092781848!092781848!n!tci Architects Engineers Contr!1718 State Road 16 !LA Crosse !wi!54601!33465!043!19!guttenberg !clayton !iowa !+000014354858!n!n!000014354858!y299!all Other Non-Building Facilities !C2 !construction !000 !* !237990!A!A!3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!005!a! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $14.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design/Build Army Reserve Regional Readiness Sustainment Command Headquarters, FT. Mccoy, WI — $12.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!600558!2100!w912qr!usa Engineer Dist Louisville !w912qr06c0021 !A!N! !N! ! !20060331!20070920!092781848!092781848!092781848!n!tci Architects/Engineers/Contr!1718 State Road 16 !LA Crosse !wi!54601!26700!081!55!fort Mccoy !monroe !wisconsin !+000011998902!n!n!000011998902!y119!other Administrative & Service Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !NOT Discernable !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!003!b! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!d!a!a!000!a!b!y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $12.1M (Department of Defense)
View all TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractor, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)