DoD Awards $14.1M for Miscellaneous Building Construction to Brantley Construction Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,167,408 ($14.2M)
Contractor: Brantley Construction Company, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-02-15
End Date: 2008-07-31
Contract Duration: 897 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200608!600471!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20060215!20071231!030104707!030104707!030104707!N!BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !8300 DORCHESTER RD !CHARLESTON !SC!29418!30850!045!45!GREENVILLE !GREENVILLE !S CAROLINA!+000013813700!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: GREENVILLE, GREENVILLE County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29605
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC for work described as: 200608!600471!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20060215!20071231!030104707!030104707!030104707!N!BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !8300 DORCHESTER RD !CHARLESTON !SC!29418!30850!045!45!GREENVILLE !GREE… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for miscellaneous building construction services. 2. The contract was awarded to Brantley Construction Company, Inc. 3. This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 4. The award was made under full and open competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value is $14,167,408. Without specific benchmarks for 'other miscellaneous buildings', a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the duration of 897 days suggests a substantial project.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition suggests efforts to secure competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers.
Public Impact
Supports infrastructure development within the Department of Defense. Provides construction services that may impact local economies where projects are located. The contract's success contributes to the operational readiness of military facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific project details for 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS'.
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts for complex construction.
- Limited information on the specific services rendered.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract awarded to a specific company with a clear scope.
- Fixed-price contract type can offer cost certainty if well-defined.
Sector Analysis
This contract is within the Construction sector, specifically for 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS'. Construction spending can vary significantly based on infrastructure needs and economic conditions. Federal construction spending benchmarks are often tied to specific building types and project scales.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers. Standard federal procurement oversight processes would apply, including contract administration and performance monitoring to ensure compliance and value.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed project scope.
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts.
- Limited information on performance and risk management.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, sc, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 200608!600471!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20060215!20071231!030104707!030104707!030104707!N!BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !8300 DORCHESTER RD !CHARLESTON !SC!29418!30850!045!45!GREENVILLE !GREENVILLE !S CAROLINA!+000013813700!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-02-15. End: 2008-07-31.
What specific types of 'miscellaneous buildings' were constructed under this contract, and how does the final cost align with industry standards for similar projects?
The provided data lacks specificity regarding the 'other miscellaneous buildings' constructed. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of the construction scope, materials, labor, and location would be necessary. Comparing the $14.1 million award to industry benchmarks for similar-sized and complex construction projects would reveal if the pricing was competitive and reasonable for the services rendered.
What were the key performance metrics and any identified risks during the contract's execution, and how were they managed?
The data does not detail performance metrics or specific risks encountered during the contract's execution from February 15, 2006, to July 31, 2008. Standard oversight would involve monitoring progress, quality, and budget adherence. Any identified risks, such as unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations, would typically be managed through contract modifications or issue resolution processes.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value and pricing for the government in this specific contract award?
The 'full and open competition' method is designed to solicit bids from all responsible sources, fostering a competitive environment that typically leads to better pricing and value. While the data confirms this method was used, a definitive assessment of its effectiveness would require comparing the winning bid against other submitted proposals and evaluating the final contract price against the project's scope and quality achieved.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8300 DORCHESTER RD, CHARLESTON, SC, 29418
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-02-15
Current End Date: 2008-07-31
Potential End Date: 2008-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-14
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)