DoD awards $18.9M for Camp Mackall facilities, with 8 bidders vying for construction
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,885,132 ($18.9M)
Contractor: Outside BOX LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-08-28
End Date: 2027-10-06
Contract Duration: 769 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BASE BID: CONSTRUCT BRAVO AND DELTA COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES AT CAMP MACKALL, NC JA-ARMY-HVAC-CHILLERS
Place of Performance
Location: HOFFMAN, RICHMOND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28347
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.9 million to OUTSIDE BOX LLC for work described as: BASE BID: CONSTRUCT BRAVO AND DELTA COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES AT CAMP MACKALL, NC JA-ARMY-HVAC-CHILLERS Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the scope of constructing two company operations facilities. 2. Strong competition among 8 bidders suggests a healthy market for this type of construction. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, primarily related to project timelines and potential construction challenges. 4. Performance context is within the typical range for large-scale military construction projects. 5. Sector positioning is within the defense construction sub-sector, a consistent area of federal spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.9 million for constructing two company operations facilities at Camp Mackall is within a reasonable range for military construction projects of this scale. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise value assessment, but the competitive nature of the award suggests fair pricing. The firm-fixed-price structure also helps control costs for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 8 distinct bidders submitting proposals. This high level of competition is a positive signal, indicating a robust market for construction services at Camp Mackall and suggesting that the government received competitive pricing. The presence of multiple bidders allows for a broader selection of qualified contractors and potentially drives down costs.
Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as contractors were incentivized to offer their best pricing to win the bid.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army personnel who will utilize the new operations facilities. The contract delivers essential infrastructure for troop readiness and training at Camp Mackall. The geographic impact is concentrated in North Carolina, specifically at Camp Mackall. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers and related trades in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for construction delays impacting operational readiness timelines.
- Ensuring quality of construction meets stringent military standards.
- Managing unforeseen site conditions or material cost fluctuations.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
- Strong competition suggests contractor capability and market availability.
- Clear project scope for constructing essential facilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically focusing on commercial and institutional building construction for military purposes. The defense construction market is a significant segment of federal spending, characterized by specialized requirements and rigorous oversight. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar military facility construction projects would typically range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on scale and complexity.
Small Business Impact
While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and there is no explicit small business set-aside noted, the robust competition among 8 bidders could still present opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The prime contractor, OUTSIDE BOX LLC, will likely engage subcontractors for specialized tasks, potentially benefiting the small business ecosystem in North Carolina.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of the Army, likely involving contracting officers, project managers, and quality assurance representatives. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms and performance requirements. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed project-specific oversight reports are not publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction (MILCON)
- Army Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM)
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) facilities
Risk Flags
- Potential for schedule delays impacting military readiness.
- Ensuring adherence to stringent military construction quality standards.
- Managing potential cost fluctuations in construction materials and labor.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, construction, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, camp-mackall, north-carolina, operations-facilities, large-contract, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.9 million to OUTSIDE BOX LLC. BASE BID: CONSTRUCT BRAVO AND DELTA COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES AT CAMP MACKALL, NC JA-ARMY-HVAC-CHILLERS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OUTSIDE BOX LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-08-28. End: 2027-10-06.
What is the track record of OUTSIDE BOX LLC in performing similar large-scale military construction projects?
Information regarding OUTSIDE BOX LLC's specific track record on large-scale military construction projects is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance ratings, contract history with the Department of Defense or other federal agencies, and any reported issues or successes on similar endeavors. Federal procurement databases and contractor performance systems would be the primary sources for this information. Without this data, it's difficult to definitively assess their experience and capability for this specific project beyond the fact that they were awarded the contract.
How does the awarded price compare to the government's independent cost estimate for this project?
The provided data does not include the government's independent cost estimate (GICE) for the construction of Bravo and Delta Company Operations Facilities. To assess value for money, a comparison between the awarded price of $18.9 million and the GICE is crucial. A significant difference could indicate issues with the bidding process, the government's estimation accuracy, or the contractor's pricing strategy. The fact that 8 bidders competed suggests the government's estimate might have been realistic enough to attract substantial interest, but a direct comparison is needed for a definitive conclusion on cost-effectiveness.
What are the primary risks associated with the construction timeline of 769 days?
The primary risks associated with a 769-day construction timeline for military facilities include potential delays due to weather, unforeseen site conditions, supply chain disruptions for materials, labor shortages, or changes in project scope. For military projects, these delays can impact training schedules, operational readiness, and troop deployment plans. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust project management, contingency planning, clear communication channels with the contractor, and potentially liquidated damages clauses for significant delays. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to adhere to the schedule to avoid incurring additional costs.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar operations facilities at Camp Mackall or other Army installations?
Historical spending patterns for similar operations facilities at Camp Mackall or other Army installations would typically show a wide range depending on the size, complexity, and specific requirements of the facilities. Factors such as location, environmental considerations, and technological integration (e.g., IT infrastructure) significantly influence costs. Analyzing past contracts for barracks, training facilities, or administrative buildings of comparable square footage and purpose would provide a benchmark. This contract's $18.9 million award for two facilities suggests a significant investment, consistent with the cost of modern military infrastructure designed for long-term use and specific operational needs.
How will the performance of OUTSIDE BOX LLC be monitored throughout the contract duration?
The performance of OUTSIDE BOX LLC will be monitored through various mechanisms typical for federal construction contracts. This includes regular site inspections by government representatives (e.g., contracting officer's representatives, quality assurance specialists) to ensure compliance with plans, specifications, and safety standards. Progress reports submitted by the contractor will be reviewed, and key performance indicators related to schedule adherence, budget management, and quality of work will be tracked. Any deviations or deficiencies will be addressed promptly through formal communication channels, potentially leading to corrective actions or contract modifications.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912PM25B0006
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: HZE
Contractor Details
Address: 1428 FLOYD AVE, RICHMOND, VA, 23220
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,272,385
Exercised Options: $18,885,132
Current Obligation: $18,885,132
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-08-28
Current End Date: 2027-10-06
Potential End Date: 2027-10-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-15
More Contracts from Outside BOX LLC
- Semo 218940, Develop Selma Interpretive Center, Selma, AL — $30.1M (Department of the Interior)
- Convert Innovation Outpost — $26.7M (Department of Defense)
- SEE Specifications: Section 01 11 00 Summary of Work JBC 12/21 Part 1 General 1.1 Work Covered by Contract Documents 1.1.1 Project Description the Work Includes Complete Renovation of Dormitory Building 304, ETC — $24.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)