DoD awards $690M contract for California wildfire prevention and response services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $690,143,043 ($690.1M)
Contractor: ECC Constructors LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-02-10
End Date: 2026-01-07
Contract Duration: 331 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.1M/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 2025 PPDR PACIFIC PALISADES
Place of Performance
Location: PACIFIC PALISADES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90272
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $690.1 million to ECC CONSTRUCTORS LLC for work described as: CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 2025 PPDR PACIFIC PALISADES Key points: 1. Contract aims to enhance preparedness and response capabilities for wildfires in California. 2. Significant investment reflects the growing threat of wildfires in the region. 3. The contract is structured as a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty. 4. Competition dynamics will be crucial in ensuring cost-effectiveness for this large-scale service. 5. Performance monitoring will be key to ensuring effective resource deployment and wildfire mitigation. 6. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term commitment to wildfire management. 7. This award represents a substantial allocation of resources towards environmental resilience.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $690 million over approximately one year is substantial, reflecting the critical nature of wildfire response in California. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale environmental service contracts is challenging due to the specific scope and geographic focus. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs. Further analysis would require comparing unit costs for specific services (e.g., fire suppression, prevention activities) against historical data or industry benchmarks if available.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This competitive process is generally expected to yield better pricing and service options for the government. The number of bidders and the specific evaluation criteria would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition and its impact on the final award price.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions, ultimately leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
Residents and communities in California, particularly those in high-risk wildfire zones, will benefit from enhanced protection and reduced risk of property damage and loss of life. The contract will support critical services related to wildfire prevention, preparedness, and potentially response operations. Geographic impact is focused on California, addressing specific regional environmental challenges. The contract is likely to create or sustain jobs in sectors related to emergency services, environmental management, and potentially construction or equipment operation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen circumstances require extensive or prolonged services beyond the initial scope.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical public safety functions.
- Risk of contractor capacity limitations during peak wildfire seasons if not adequately managed.
- Environmental impacts associated with large-scale operations, such as equipment use and personnel deployment.
Positive Signals
- Awarding under full and open competition suggests a robust vetting process and potential for competitive pricing.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The substantial value indicates a significant commitment to addressing a critical national issue.
- The contract duration suggests a strategic, long-term approach to wildfire management.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader environmental services and defense support sectors. The market for wildfire management and prevention services is growing significantly due to climate change and increased development in wildland-urban interfaces. Spending in this area is often characterized by a mix of government-led initiatives and contracted services, with significant investments made by federal agencies like the Department of Defense, particularly in regions prone to natural disasters. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing budgets for agencies like the Forest Service and FEMA for similar large-scale disaster preparedness and response contracts.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Given the large contract value and specialized nature of wildfire services, it is possible that larger, established firms will be the primary awardees. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation and its potential impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Mechanisms would include contract performance monitoring, regular reporting requirements from the contractor, and potentially site inspections. Accountability measures are built into the firm-fixed-price structure, with payments tied to performance and delivery. Transparency would be enhanced through public contract databases and potential reporting on service delivery and outcomes.
Related Government Programs
- CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 2025 PPDR PACIFIC PALISADES
- Wildfire Prevention and Suppression Services
- Department of Defense Environmental Services Contracts
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Disaster Response Contracts
- US Forest Service Wildfire Management Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope significantly expands due to unforeseen wildfire events.
- Contractor performance risk in delivering critical services under demanding conditions.
- Environmental impact assessment needed for large-scale operations.
- Dependence on specialized equipment and personnel availability during peak seasons.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, california, wildfire-prevention, wildfire-response, environmental-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, large-contract, natural-disaster-preparedness
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $690.1 million to ECC CONSTRUCTORS LLC. CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 2025 PPDR PACIFIC PALISADES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ECC CONSTRUCTORS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $690.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-02-10. End: 2026-01-07.
What is the specific breakdown of services to be provided under this contract?
The provided data does not detail the specific services included in the $690 million contract for 'CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 2025 PPDR PACIFIC PALISADES'. However, based on the context of wildfire prevention and response, services likely encompass a range of activities such as vegetation management, fire break creation, early detection systems, emergency response planning, and potentially direct firefighting support. The 'PPDR' acronym might indicate 'Preparedness, Prevention, Detection, and Response,' suggesting a comprehensive approach. A detailed statement of work (SOW) within the full contract documentation would clarify the exact deliverables, performance standards, and scope of operations.
How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on similar wildfire services by the Department of Defense in California?
Directly comparing the $690 million award to historical spending requires access to detailed historical contract data for similar services provided by the Department of Defense (DoD) in California. Without specific historical figures, it's difficult to ascertain if this represents an increase or decrease. However, the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires, coupled with potential shifts in federal strategy and resource allocation, could justify a higher investment. It is advisable to consult databases like USAspending.gov or agency-specific historical contract repositories to identify trends and comparable contract values over the past several years to establish a baseline for comparison.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of this contract?
While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided summary, typical performance indicators for wildfire prevention and response contracts often include metrics related to response time, area managed or treated for fuel reduction, successful containment of fires within predefined perimeters, reduction in wildfire ignitions or acreage burned in targeted areas, and adherence to safety protocols. For preparedness, KPIs might involve the readiness of personnel and equipment, effectiveness of early warning systems, and successful execution of emergency drills. The contract's statement of work would explicitly define these KPIs and the associated performance standards and incentives or penalties.
What is the track record of ECC Constructors LLC in managing large-scale government contracts, particularly in environmental or emergency response services?
Information regarding ECC Constructors LLC's track record with large-scale government contracts, especially in environmental or emergency response services, is not provided in the summary data. To assess their capability, one would need to research their past performance on similar contracts, including their history with the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. Key areas to investigate would include their financial stability, project completion history, safety records, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Government contract databases and contractor performance assessment reporting systems (CPARS) are valuable resources for this type of due diligence.
What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract of this magnitude for wildfire services?
A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract of this magnitude for wildfire services carries several potential risks. For the contractor (ECC Constructors LLC), the primary risk is underestimating the costs associated with unpredictable events like severe weather, unexpected fire behavior, or the need for extensive resources, which could lead to reduced profit margins or even losses if costs exceed the fixed price. For the government, the risk lies in the contractor potentially cutting corners on service quality or safety to maintain profitability, or in the possibility that the fixed price may not adequately cover unforeseen, large-scale emergencies that exceed the contract's scope. Effective oversight and clear performance standards are crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does this contract align with broader federal strategies for climate change adaptation and resilience?
This contract aligns with broader federal strategies for climate change adaptation and resilience by directly addressing the increasing threat of wildfires, a significant consequence of climate change. By investing $690 million in preparedness and response, the Department of Defense is contributing to the protection of critical infrastructure, military installations, and surrounding communities in California, a state highly vulnerable to climate impacts. This proactive measure supports national security by mitigating risks associated with natural disasters and ensuring operational continuity. It reflects a commitment to enhancing the nation's capacity to withstand and recover from climate-related events, a key objective of federal climate adaptation policies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Waste Collection › Other Waste Collection
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1240 BAYSHORE HWY STE 301, BURLINGAME, CA, 94010
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $690,143,043
Exercised Options: $690,143,043
Current Obligation: $690,143,043
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912EK23D0011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-02-10
Current End Date: 2026-01-07
Potential End Date: 2026-01-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-09
More Contracts from ECC Constructors LLC
- California Wildfires 2025 Ppdr Eaton — $773.1M (Department of Defense)
- Debris Removal & Disposal Operations for 268 Properties in Lahaina, HI DUE to the Hawaii Wildfire in August 2023 — $373.3M (Department of Defense)
- TDS Site Operation & Maintenance and Private Property Debris Removal (ppdr) — $210.4M (Department of Defense)
- California Wildfires 2025 in Support of Hazardous Site Assessments — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- California Wildfires 2025 - Eligible Non-Residential Property Debris Removal — $65.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)