DoD Awards $45.8M Contract for Murrieta Creek Phase 2B Construction
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,787,959 ($45.8M)
Contractor: Empire Equipment Service, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2028-07-10
End Date: 2028-12-15
Contract Duration: 158 days
Daily Burn Rate: $289.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: MURRIETA CREEK PHASE 2B
Place of Performance
Location: TEMECULA, RIVERSIDE County, CALIFORNIA, 92589
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $45.8 million to EMPIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC. for work described as: MURRIETA CREEK PHASE 2B Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Empire Equipment Service, Inc. for construction services. 2. The contract is for 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' (NAICS 237990). 3. This is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 4. The project is located in California and has a duration of 158 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The awarded amount of $45.8M appears to be within a reasonable range for a large-scale civil engineering project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar DoD construction contracts would provide a more definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a limited competition. This method may impact price discovery, potentially leading to higher costs than full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for this infrastructure project. The limited competition raises questions about whether the most cost-effective solution was secured.
Public Impact
Infrastructure development in California will be supported by this contract. The project aims to improve civil engineering infrastructure, potentially benefiting local communities. The Department of Defense is investing in construction projects, indicating ongoing federal infrastructure priorities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
- Contract duration seems relatively short for a project of this scale.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
- Project addresses critical infrastructure needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the heavy and civil engineering construction sector. Federal spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, military base improvements, and disaster recovery efforts. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Empire Equipment Service, Inc. There is no indication of specific small business set-asides or subcontracting goals within the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army, under the Department of Defense, is the awarding agency. Standard oversight mechanisms for federal construction contracts would apply, including monitoring progress, quality, and adherence to contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpricing.
- The contract's short duration for a large project may pose execution risks.
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $45.8 million to EMPIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC.. MURRIETA CREEK PHASE 2B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EMPIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2028-07-10. End: 2028-12-15.
What specific factors led to the exclusion of sources in this 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award, and how did this impact the final price?
The exclusion of sources suggests specific technical requirements, past performance considerations, or unique capabilities were sought, limiting the pool of eligible bidders. This restriction can reduce competitive pressure, potentially leading to a higher price than if all potential sources were allowed to compete. A detailed review of the solicitation and award justification would clarify the reasons and their pricing implications.
How does the $45.8M contract value compare to the estimated cost and the bids received from other potential competitors, if any were considered?
Without access to the bid tabulation or pre-solicitation estimates, it's difficult to definitively assess value. The 'fair' rating suggests the price is not egregiously high but doesn't confirm it's the best possible price. Comparing the awarded amount to the government's estimate and any other submitted bids would reveal the degree of price competition and potential savings.
What are the key performance indicators and oversight mechanisms in place to ensure the successful and timely completion of Murrieta Creek Phase 2B within the $45.8M budget?
Standard federal contract oversight would involve project managers monitoring progress against milestones, quality control inspections, and financial tracking. Specific KPIs would likely include adherence to schedule, quality standards for construction, and budget management. The firm fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively, but robust government oversight is crucial to ensure contract compliance and prevent cost overruns or scope creep.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912PL25BA004
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5271 AGATE ST, RIVERSIDE, CA, 92509
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $47,949,080
Exercised Options: $45,787,959
Current Obligation: $45,787,959
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2028-07-10
Current End Date: 2028-12-15
Potential End Date: 2028-12-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-12
More Contracts from Empire Equipment Service, Inc.
- SEE Attached Clin Schedule — $30.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)