NACO Border Patrol Station Construction Contract Awarded for $34.2M to Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,227,925 ($34.2M)
Contractor: Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-08-31
End Date: 2012-11-08
Contract Duration: 800 days
Daily Burn Rate: $42.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: NACO BORDER PATROL STATION
Place of Performance
Location: NACO, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85620
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $34.2 million to JEFFREY C. STONE, INC. for work described as: NACO BORDER PATROL STATION Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a specific reason for limiting initial bidders. 2. The project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a sector with significant taxpayer investment. 3. The award value of $34.2M is substantial for a single station construction project. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. The duration of the contract was 800 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $34.2M for a border patrol station construction project needs to be benchmarked against similar projects to assess its fairness. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparable project costs, a definitive assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were initially excluded. This could impact price discovery by potentially limiting the number of competitive bids received.
Taxpayer Impact: The final price of $34.2M represents a significant taxpayer investment. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value for taxpayer funds is a key consideration.
Public Impact
Construction of critical infrastructure for border security. Potential impact on local economies through job creation and material sourcing. Ensuring the efficient and cost-effective use of taxpayer funds for government facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition method raises questions about potential price inflation.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdowns makes value assessment difficult.
- Contract awarded to a single entity without clear justification for source exclusion.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Project addresses a national security need.
- Contract duration is defined.
Sector Analysis
The construction sector is characterized by varying levels of competition and cost efficiency depending on project type and location. Border infrastructure projects often involve unique logistical and security considerations that can influence costs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated factor in this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were available to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would focus on ensuring the construction meets specifications, stays within budget, and adheres to the contract timeline. Accountability rests with the Department of the Army to manage the contractor and verify deliverables.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about potential price inflation.
- Lack of transparency regarding source exclusion.
- Need for detailed cost benchmarking to validate value.
- Potential for cost overruns if oversight is insufficient, despite fixed-price contract.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $34.2 million to JEFFREY C. STONE, INC.. NACO BORDER PATROL STATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JEFFREY C. STONE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-08-31. End: 2012-11-08.
What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources prior to the 'full and open competition' phase, and how did this impact the final contract price?
The justification for excluding sources prior to the 'full and open competition' phase is not detailed in the provided data. This exclusion could have limited the number of potential bidders, potentially leading to a higher contract price than if all qualified sources had been allowed to compete from the outset. Further investigation into the contract's award documentation is necessary to understand the rationale and its financial implications.
How does the $34.2M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar border patrol station construction projects, considering the project's scope and location in Arizona?
Benchmarking the $34.2M contract value requires detailed cost data for comparable border patrol stations, including size, materials, security features, and site preparation costs in similar geographic regions. Without this granular data, it's difficult to definitively assess if the price is competitive. The firm fixed-price nature suggests cost risk is on the contractor, but the initial award price's fairness remains a key question.
What measures were in place to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the construction process, given the significant investment and the firm fixed-price contract type?
Effectiveness and efficiency under a firm fixed-price contract are typically ensured through robust contract management, clear performance standards, and regular progress monitoring by the contracting officer. The Department of the Army would be responsible for overseeing the contractor's adherence to the schedule, quality of work, and overall project completion. The 800-day duration suggests a substantial project requiring diligent oversight to prevent delays and cost overruns.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912PL10R0036
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3333 E CAMELBACK RD STE 122, PHOENIX, AZ, 85018
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,227,925
Exercised Options: $34,227,925
Current Obligation: $34,227,925
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-08-31
Current End Date: 2012-11-08
Potential End Date: 2012-11-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-10-03
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)