Army Corps of Engineers awards $10.9M contract for Hurricane Katrina recovery construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,896,595 ($11.9M)

Contractor: Aptim Government Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-12-03

End Date: 2012-06-01

Contract Duration: 2,372 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200604!600646!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0059 !A!N! !N! ! !20051203!20060401!109514559!109514559!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRU!4171 ESSEN LN !BATON ROUGE !LA!70809!10985!075!22!BURAS !PLAQUEMINES !LOUISIANA !+000007879958!N!N!000007879958!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZHK !HURRICANE KATRINA !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!003!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! ! !96CE!W912P8!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: BELLE CHASSE, PLAQUEMINES County, LOUISIANA, 70037

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.9 million to APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: 200604!600646!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0059 !A!N! !N! ! !20051203!20060401!109514559!109514559!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRU!4171 ESSEN LN !BATON ROUGE !LA!70809!10985!075!22!BURAS !PLAQ… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded to APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC for 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction'. 2. The contract duration was 2372 days, significantly longer than the initial award date. 3. The total value of the contract was $10,951,455.90. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 5. The project was related to Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.9M for heavy civil engineering construction appears within a reasonable range for large-scale recovery projects. However, without specific project scope details, a precise benchmark is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received fair value for the services rendered in the post-Hurricane Katrina recovery.

Public Impact

Significant federal investment in disaster recovery infrastructure. Contract awarded to a private entity for essential public works. Potential for long-term economic impact in the affected Louisiana region. Highlights the government's role in responding to natural disasters.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration significantly exceeds typical project timelines.
  • Lack of specific details on the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' scope.
  • Potential for cost overruns given the extended duration and disaster context.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contract aimed at critical Hurricane Katrina recovery.
  • Significant investment in rebuilding infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Construction sector, specifically heavy and civil engineering. The $10.9M award is substantial, reflecting the scale of post-disaster reconstruction efforts.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved as prime contractors or significant subcontractors in this particular award. Further analysis would be needed to determine any indirect small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, Engineer District New Orleans, indicating oversight by a federal agency. The long duration and disaster context may warrant specific oversight to ensure efficient use of funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Extended contract duration raises questions about initial planning and execution efficiency.
  • Vague description of construction scope ('Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction').
  • Potential for cost creep or scope changes in long-term disaster recovery contracts.
  • Lack of transparency regarding specific project milestones and deliverables.
  • No clear indication of small business participation.

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, la, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.9 million to APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. 200604!600646!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0059 !A!N! !N! ! !20051203!20060401!109514559!109514559!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRU!4171 ESSEN LN !BATON ROUGE !LA!70809!10985!075!22!BURAS !PLAQUEMINES !LOUISIANA !+000007879958!N!N!000007879958!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZHK !HURRICANE KATRINA !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-03. End: 2012-06-01.

What specific construction activities were undertaken under this contract, and how did they contribute to Hurricane Katrina recovery?

The contract was for 'ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES' construction, likely encompassing a broad range of infrastructure repairs and rebuilding efforts in the Plaquemines Parish area following Hurricane Katrina. This could include roads, levees, utilities, or other essential civil engineering works critical for restoring community functionality and resilience.

Given the contract's extended duration (2005-2012), were there any significant cost escalations or changes in scope that impacted the final $10.9M expenditure?

The extended duration from the award date (2005) to the completion date (2012) suggests potential for scope adjustments or phased execution, common in large-scale disaster recovery. While the contract was firm fixed price, the length of performance could have introduced unforeseen challenges or necessitated modifications, impacting the overall cost-effectiveness.

How effective was this contract in achieving its stated goals of supporting Hurricane Katrina recovery and rebuilding infrastructure?

The effectiveness is difficult to ascertain solely from contract data. However, the substantial federal investment and the long-term commitment indicate a significant effort towards recovery. The ultimate measure of effectiveness would involve assessing the restored infrastructure's resilience and functionality in subsequent years.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Shaw Group Inc., the (UEI: 180038382)

Address: 4171 ESSEN LN, BATON ROUGE, LA, 70809

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-12-03

Current End Date: 2012-06-01

Potential End Date: 2012-06-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-25

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending