DoD's $14.6M Fish Barrier Construction Contract Awarded to E.P. Doyle & Son, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,571,528 ($14.6M)

Contractor: E.P. Doyle & SON, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-10-30

End Date: 2012-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,127 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TAS::96 3134::TAS ARRA::YES::ARRA CONSTRUCTION OF THE FISH BARRIER IIB BUILDING

Place of Performance

Location: ROMEOVILLE, WILL County, ILLINOIS, 60446

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.6 million to E.P. DOYLE & SON, LLC for work described as: TAS::96 3134::TAS ARRA::YES::ARRA CONSTRUCTION OF THE FISH BARRIER IIB BUILDING Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $14.6 million, was awarded for the construction of the Fish Barrier IIB Building. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The project falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector. 4. The contract duration was 1127 days, indicating a significant construction timeline.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.6 million for heavy civil engineering construction needs to be benchmarked against similar projects to assess its pricing fairness. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to industry standards for similar barrier construction, a definitive assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and can lead to more competitive pricing. The price discovery mechanism relies on the competitive bids submitted by qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.

Public Impact

Environmental protection through the construction of a fish barrier. Infrastructure development within the Department of Defense. Potential economic impact through construction jobs and material sourcing. Long-term maintenance and operational considerations for the barrier.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific per-unit cost data for benchmarking.
No indication of small business participation.
Contract duration significantly exceeded initial estimates (implied by 'dur' vs 'no').

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Clear project objective related to environmental protection.
Contract awarded by a major federal agency (DoD).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector, which includes a wide range of infrastructure projects. Benchmarking requires comparison with similar large-scale civil engineering and construction contracts, considering factors like project complexity and location.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract did not involve small business participation (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the project's scope inherently limited small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management teams ensuring adherence to terms, quality standards, and timely completion, with potential for audits and reviews.

Related Government Programs

Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to long contract duration.
Lack of transparency on small business participation.
Need for detailed cost-benefit analysis regarding environmental impact.
Absence of specific per-unit cost data for robust price validation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.6 million to E.P. DOYLE & SON, LLC. TAS::96 3134::TAS ARRA::YES::ARRA CONSTRUCTION OF THE FISH BARRIER IIB BUILDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is E.P. DOYLE & SON, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-30. End: 2012-11-30.

What specific environmental benefits are expected from the Fish Barrier IIB Building, and how will their achievement be measured?

The primary environmental benefit is expected to be the prevention of invasive species migration, thereby protecting native aquatic ecosystems. Measurement would likely involve monitoring fish populations above and below the barrier, assessing water quality, and potentially tracking the success of mitigation efforts for any unintended ecological impacts. The effectiveness of the barrier in achieving its stated environmental goals is crucial for justifying the investment.

Given the contract duration of 1127 days, were there significant delays or scope changes that impacted the final cost?

A contract duration of over three years (1127 days) suggests a complex project. It is important to investigate whether this duration was planned or resulted from delays, change orders, or unforeseen challenges. Understanding the reasons behind the duration is key to assessing project management effectiveness and potential cost overruns or efficiencies.

How does the $14.6 million cost compare to similar large-scale civil engineering construction projects, particularly those involving environmental barriers?

Benchmarking this $14.6 million contract against similar projects is essential for evaluating value for money. Without access to a database of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if the price is competitive. Factors such as geographic location, specific technical requirements, and prevailing market conditions for construction materials and labor would influence cost comparisons.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912P609B0021

Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1100 WHEATON OAKS CT, WHEATON, IL, 60187

Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,571,528

Exercised Options: $14,571,528

Current Obligation: $14,571,528

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline