DoD's $23.8M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,873,618 ($23.9M)

Contractor: Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-08-31

End Date: 2012-02-29

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES County, TEXAS, 78419

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.9 million to BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. The contract was not competitively procured, raising questions about potential price efficiencies. 3. Long contract duration (over 5 years) suggests a need for stable, long-term support services. 4. The contract was awarded in 2006, with performance ending in 2012, providing historical context. 5. Services fall under Facilities Support Services, a broad category essential for operational readiness. 6. The contractor, Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc., has a history of performing government contracts. 7. Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on military installation support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the lack of detailed cost breakdowns and competitive pricing information. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests cost certainty for the government, but without a competitive process, it's difficult to assess if the pricing reflects market value or represents a good deal. The total award amount of approximately $23.8 million over its period of performance indicates a significant investment in facilities support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded under a sole-source or 'not available for competition' basis. This means that the Department of the Army did not solicit bids from multiple contractors. The specific justification for this procurement approach is not provided, but it typically implies that only one contractor was deemed capable of meeting the requirement, or that it was awarded under specific exceptions to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher prices for taxpayers as the absence of competition limits price discovery and negotiation leverage.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its personnel, who receive essential facilities support services. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, custodial, and other operational support for military facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Texas, where the contract was performed. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for individuals performing the facilities support tasks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may have resulted in a higher price than a competitively bid contract.
The 'not available for competition' status requires careful review of the justification to ensure it was appropriate.
Long-term nature of facilities support contracts can sometimes lead to complacency if not actively managed.
The specific scope of 'Facilities Support Services' can be broad; clarity on deliverables is crucial for performance assessment.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to a specific contractor suggests they met the government's requirements at the time of award.
The contract was performed in Texas, potentially supporting local economies through employment and operations.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This includes everything from janitorial and groundskeeping to building systems maintenance and repair. The total federal spending in this sector can be in the billions annually, supporting numerous installations and operations. This specific contract represents a portion of the Department of Defense's overall investment in maintaining its infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not available for this contract. The fact that it was awarded as 'not available for competition' may limit opportunities for small businesses unless they were the specific sole-source provider or a subcontractor to the prime. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small business goals were incorporated into the award decision or performance.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officer and relevant program managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would typically involve performance metrics, inspections, and payment reviews tied to the firm-fixed-price contract terms. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award and the lack of publicly available detailed justifications or performance reports.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Army Base Operations Support
Government Building Services
Installation Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award bypasses competitive pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders assessment.
Contract duration requires ongoing oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.9 million to BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.. FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-08-31. End: 2012-02-29.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which is a designation for sole-source awards. The specific justification for this determination is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, sole-source awards are made when only one responsible source is available or capable of meeting the requirement, or under specific exceptions outlined in federal acquisition regulations (e.g., urgent and compelling needs, unique capabilities). Without the official justification document, it's impossible to ascertain the precise reasons the Department of the Army did not pursue a competitive procurement for these facilities support services.

How does the total contract value of $23.8 million compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army during that period?

Comparing the $23.8 million total award value requires context regarding the scope and duration of services. Facilities support contracts can vary significantly in size and complexity, ranging from localized maintenance at a single facility to comprehensive support across multiple installations. Given this contract's performance period spanned over five years (late 2006 to early 2012), the annual value averaged around $4.7 million. This figure is moderate for large-scale military installation support. However, without knowing the specific services rendered (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, groundskeeping, minor repairs) and the size/type of facilities supported, a direct comparison to other contracts is difficult. A comprehensive analysis would involve benchmarking against contracts with similar service scopes and geographic concentrations awarded by the Army or other DoD components during the same timeframe.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) that were part of this facilities support services contract. For firm-fixed-price contracts, performance is typically measured against the defined scope of work and delivery requirements. Common KPIs in facilities support might include response times for maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, cleanliness standards, energy efficiency targets, or safety compliance metrics. The absence of this information limits the ability to assess the contractor's performance quality and the overall effectiveness of the services delivered under this award.

What is the track record of Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. in performing federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts. While the provided data is limited to this specific $23.8 million facilities support contract, a broader search of federal procurement databases would reveal other awards to this company. Analyzing their past performance, including contract values, agencies served, types of services provided, and any reported performance issues or accolades, would offer a more comprehensive view of their capabilities and reliability. Understanding their broader track record is crucial for assessing their suitability and performance consistency in government service delivery.

Were there any specific risks identified during the procurement or performance of this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks identified during the procurement or performance phases of this contract. However, common risks associated with large facilities support contracts include scope creep, contractor performance deficiencies, cost overruns (less likely with FFP but possible through change orders), safety incidents, and challenges in managing a long-term service agreement. The sole-source nature of the award itself can be considered a risk factor, as it bypasses the competitive process designed to mitigate risks related to pricing and contractor selection. A thorough risk assessment would typically be documented within the contract file.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: K'oyitl'ots'ina, Limited (UEI: 943392522)

Address: 1603 COLLEGE ROAD, FAIRBANKS, AK, 99701

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,856,717

Exercised Options: $23,873,618

Current Obligation: $23,873,618

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline