DoD's $23.6M Construct Readiness Center Contract Awarded to Wade Perrow Construction
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,579,810 ($23.6M)
Contractor: Wade Perrow Construction, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-08
End Date: 2011-10-14
Contract Duration: 766 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT READINESS CENTER
Place of Performance
Location: TACOMA, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98433
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.6 million to WADE PERROW CONSTRUCTION, LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCT READINESS CENTER Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction services, indicating infrastructure development needs. 2. Wade Perrow Construction, LLC secured the contract, suggesting established capabilities in the sector. 3. The contract's value of $23.6M places it as a significant investment in readiness infrastructure. 4. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources was the method, implying a specific procurement strategy. 5. The project duration of 766 days highlights the scale and complexity of the construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $23.6M for a readiness center construction project appears within a reasonable range for large-scale institutional building. Benchmarking against similar DoD construction projects would provide a more precise assessment of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were initially excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery. The final award price reflects the outcome of this specific competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for infrastructure development, aiming to enhance military readiness. The efficiency of the procurement process and the final price achieved will determine the overall taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Enhances military readiness infrastructure, directly supporting operational capabilities. Supports the construction industry and associated supply chains. Potential for job creation during the construction phase. Ensures facilities meet the specific needs of the Army's readiness programs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition method could lead to higher costs.
- Exclusion of sources may have reduced the pool of potential bidders.
- Fixed-price contract may not fully account for unforeseen construction challenges.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical infrastructure needs for military readiness.
- Awarded to a specific company, indicating a focused approach to project execution.
- Significant investment in facilities development.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital area for government infrastructure development. Spending benchmarks for similar readiness center constructions would typically vary based on size, location, and specific requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that the prime contractor is Wade Perrow Construction, LLC. There is no explicit information provided regarding small business subcontracting participation in this award, which warrants further investigation for potential small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve contract management by the Department of the Army to ensure adherence to specifications, timelines, and budget. Accountability rests with the contractor to deliver the project successfully and the agency to monitor performance.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to fixed-price contract.
- Limited competition may have resulted in a suboptimal price.
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
- Construction projects are inherently subject to delays and unforeseen issues.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, wa, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.6 million to WADE PERROW CONSTRUCTION, LLC. CONSTRUCT READINESS CENTER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WADE PERROW CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-08. End: 2011-10-14.
What was the rationale for excluding certain sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method, and how did this impact the final price?
The rationale for excluding sources typically relates to specific technical requirements, past performance, or unique capabilities needed for the project. This exclusion can limit the number of bidders, potentially reducing competitive pressure and influencing the final awarded price. A detailed review of the solicitation documents and award justification would clarify the specific reasons and their price impact.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this readiness center construction project, and how is contractor performance being monitored?
Key performance indicators likely include adherence to schedule, budget compliance, quality of construction, and safety standards. Contractor performance is typically monitored through regular site inspections, progress reports, milestone reviews, and performance evaluations conducted by the contracting officer's representative (COR) or project manager.
Beyond the initial construction, what is the long-term operational and maintenance cost projection for this readiness center, and how does it factor into the overall value assessment?
Long-term operational and maintenance costs are crucial for a comprehensive value assessment but are not detailed in the provided award data. These costs would include utilities, repairs, and staffing. Agencies typically conduct lifecycle cost analyses during the planning phase to estimate these future expenses and inform procurement decisions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912K309B0001
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10421 BURNHAM DR NW, GIG HARBOR, WA, 06
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,579,810
Exercised Options: $23,579,810
Current Obligation: $23,579,810
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-08
Current End Date: 2011-10-14
Potential End Date: 2011-10-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-10-25
More Contracts from Wade Perrow Construction, LLC
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)