DoD's $19.6M MATES Contract Awarded to J & S Construction Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,637,181 ($19.6M)

Contractor: J & S Construction Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-09-25

End Date: 2015-10-12

Contract Duration: 1,112 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MANEUVER TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE (MATES)

Place of Performance

Location: FORT STEWART, LIBERTY County, GEORGIA, 31314, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.6 million to J & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. for work described as: MANEUVER TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE (MATES) Key points: 1. The Department of the Army awarded a $19.6 million contract for the Maneuver Training Equipment Site (MATES). 2. J & S Construction Company, Inc. secured the contract following full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration was 1112 days, indicating a significant, multi-year project. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 5. A notable benchmark of $17.66 million was observed, suggesting potential cost efficiencies or market conditions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.6 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar institutional building construction contracts would provide further validation, but the reported benchmark of $17.66 million suggests the awarded price is within an expected range.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process that allowed multiple bidders but with specific source exclusions. This method aims for price discovery while potentially focusing on specialized capabilities.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered, as multiple qualified contractors had the opportunity to bid.

Public Impact

Enhances military readiness through improved training facilities. Supports construction industry jobs and economic activity in Georgia. Ensures efficient use of taxpayer funds through competitive bidding.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Exclusion of sources in competition could limit ultimate price reduction.
Lack of small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Firm fixed price contract mitigates cost overrun risk.
Project located in Georgia, potentially benefiting local economy.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which involves the building of facilities for non-residential purposes. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on defense needs and infrastructure investment cycles.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed for small businesses or if the project scope inherently favored larger firms.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for major construction projects. The 'GA' status code might indicate specific oversight or reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
No small business participation identified.
Award price exceeds benchmark, requiring justification.
Contract duration is substantial, increasing risk exposure over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.6 million to J & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.. MANEUVER TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE (MATES)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-09-25. End: 2015-10-12.

What specific capabilities were excluded from the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' and why?

The specific capabilities excluded are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, exclusions in 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' are based on unique technical requirements, security clearances, or prior performance that only a limited number of entities possess. Understanding these exclusions is crucial to assessing whether the competition was truly maximized or if it inadvertently narrowed the field of potential bidders, potentially impacting the final price.

What was the rationale behind excluding small businesses from this significant construction contract?

The provided data indicates no small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). The rationale could stem from the project's scale, complexity, or specific bonding and insurance requirements that larger firms are better equipped to meet. However, agencies are generally encouraged to find ways to include small businesses, so understanding the specific barriers encountered would be beneficial for future contract planning and ensuring equitable opportunities.

How does the awarded price of $19.6 million compare to the reported benchmark of $17.66 million, and what does this imply about value for money?

The awarded price of $19.6 million is approximately 10.9% higher than the reported benchmark of $17.66 million. While this difference might seem significant, it's important to consider the context. Benchmarks are often estimates, and actual market conditions, specific project requirements, and the competitive landscape can lead to variations. Without knowing the exact nature of the benchmark and the bidding process, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money, though it warrants further scrutiny.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912JM12R0011

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1843 FOREMAN DR, COOKEVILLE, TN, 38501

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,637,181

Exercised Options: $19,637,181

Current Obligation: $19,637,181

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline