DoD's $12.76M airfield pavement construction contract awarded to CCI, Inc. in 2008

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,763,317 ($12.8M)

Contractor: CCI, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-04-08

End Date: 2008-11-24

Contract Duration: 230 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS

Place of Performance

Location: BANGOR, PENOBSCOT County, MAINE, 04401

State: Maine Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.8 million to CCI, INC. for work described as: CONSTRUCT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns. 3. The contract duration was 230 days, suggesting a relatively short-term project. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237310 points to highway, street, and bridge construction. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. 6. The contract was awarded in Maine, indicating a specific geographic location for the work.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar airfield pavement projects from 2008. The fixed-price nature is a positive indicator for cost control. However, the provided data lacks sufficient detail to definitively assess value for money against market rates or other contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific project. While competition is generally beneficial, the exact number of bidders can influence price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army, who receive improved airfield infrastructure. The services delivered include the construction or repair of airfield pavements. The geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation in Maine where the work was performed. Workforce implications would include employment for construction workers and related trades in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to assess cost-effectiveness.
Limited information on the specific scope of work beyond 'construct airfield pavements'.
No data on contractor performance history for this specific type of project.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a fair bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Contract was awarded to a single entity (CCI, INC.), implying a clear line of responsibility.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically related to infrastructure development for the Department of Defense. Airfield pavement construction is a specialized area within civil engineering and construction, requiring expertise in materials, grading, and durability under heavy loads. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader category of military infrastructure projects or large-scale civil engineering contracts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, CCI, Inc., would have determined its own subcontracting strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified work. Transparency is generally facilitated by contract award data, though detailed project execution and oversight reports are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects
Military Airfield Maintenance and Construction
Civil Engineering Contracts
Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed scope of work
Limited performance data for contractor
Insufficient data for value benchmarking

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.8 million to CCI, INC.. CONSTRUCT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CCI, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-04-08. End: 2008-11-24.

What was the specific scope of work for constructing these airfield pavements?

The provided data indicates the scope of work as 'CONSTRUCT AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS' under NAICS code 237310 (Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction). However, specific details regarding the exact nature of the construction (e.g., new pavement, repair, resurfacing, specific materials used, dimensions) are not available in this summary. Further details would typically be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), which are not included in the provided data.

How does the awarded amount of $12.76 million compare to similar airfield pavement projects?

Direct comparison of the $12.76 million award to similar airfield pavement projects is difficult without more context. Factors influencing cost include project size, complexity, location, materials, and the specific year of award. This contract was awarded in 2008. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable projects from the same period, considering similar square footage, thickness, material specifications, and geographic region. Without access to a database of historical airfield construction costs, a precise comparison is not feasible based solely on the provided data.

What is the track record of CCI, Inc. in performing similar construction contracts?

The provided data identifies CCI, Inc. as the contractor but does not offer details on their past performance, track record, or experience with airfield pavement construction. To assess their track record, one would need to consult contract databases for previous awards to CCI, Inc., review past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and examine their history with fixed-price contracts and projects of similar scale and complexity. This information is crucial for understanding their reliability and capability.

What were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they managed?

Key risks for an airfield pavement construction project include unforeseen subsurface conditions, weather delays impacting the schedule, material cost fluctuations, and contractor performance issues. The fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risk for the government by placing it on the contractor. Management of schedule and performance risks would typically involve detailed project oversight, regular progress meetings, quality assurance checks, and adherence to the contract's terms and conditions. Specific risk mitigation strategies employed for this contract are not detailed in the provided data.

What is the historical spending pattern for airfield pavement construction by the Department of the Army?

The provided data only includes a single contract award. To understand historical spending patterns for airfield pavement construction by the Department of the Army, a comprehensive analysis of contract awards over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve identifying all contracts related to airfield pavement construction, their values, durations, and the specific Army commands or installations involved. Such an analysis would reveal trends in spending, identify major projects, and potentially highlight periods of increased or decreased investment in this area.

How did the number of bidders (3) influence the final contract price?

With three bidders, there was a moderate level of competition for this contract. Generally, more bidders lead to increased price competition, potentially driving down the final price. However, the impact also depends on the competitiveness of the bids submitted and the specific requirements of the contract. If the three bidders were all highly qualified and submitted competitive offers, the government likely received a fair price. Conversely, if the pool of qualified bidders was limited, or if the requirements were highly specialized, three bidders might represent the extent of viable competition, and the price might reflect that.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912JD08R0001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: HZE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Bristol BAY Native Corporation

Address: 111 W 16TH AVE # 401, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,763,317

Exercised Options: $12,763,317

Current Obligation: $12,763,317

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline