DoD Awards $28.3M for Sagami Depot Tactical Equipment Facility to Gilbane Japan GK
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,345,384 ($28.3M)
Contractor: Gilbane Japan GK
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-08-08
End Date: 2020-08-31
Contract Duration: 1,119 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CONTRACT AWARD OF THE FY13 TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY, SAGAMI DEPOT, JAPAN
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.3 million to GILBANE JAPAN GK for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CONTRACT AWARD OF THE FY13 TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY, SAGAMI DEPOT, JAPAN Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction of a tactical equipment maintenance facility. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating price certainty. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $28.3M for a facility of this nature appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar construction projects for military facilities would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests some limitations, potentially impacting the breadth of competition and price discovery. Further details on the exclusion rationale are needed.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, aims to achieve fair pricing for taxpayers. The final price will be evaluated against market rates.
Public Impact
Supports military readiness by providing essential maintenance facilities. Contributes to infrastructure development in Japan. Creates jobs during the construction phase.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Ambiguity in competition exclusion criteria.
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts for complex projects.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Awarded by Department of the Army, a major DoD component.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar military facility construction projects are essential for a thorough value assessment.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated factor in this award (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be crucial to ensure the facility is built to specifications and within budget, especially given the firm fixed-price nature of the contract and the duration.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts.
- Lack of detailed justification for source exclusion.
- Need for robust oversight to ensure quality and timeliness.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.3 million to GILBANE JAPAN GK. IGF::OT::IGF CONTRACT AWARD OF THE FY13 TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY, SAGAMI DEPOT, JAPAN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GILBANE JAPAN GK.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-08-08. End: 2020-08-31.
What was the rationale for excluding specific sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process, and how did this impact the final price?
The rationale for excluding sources needs clarification. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical requirements, security concerns, or prior performance issues. Understanding this rationale is key to assessing whether the competition was truly optimized for value and if the final price reflects the best possible outcome for taxpayers, or if it potentially limited competitive pressure.
How does the awarded price of $28.3M compare to industry benchmarks for similar tactical equipment maintenance facilities, considering the location and scope?
A direct comparison to industry benchmarks is necessary to validate the value for money. Factors such as square footage, specialized equipment requirements, and prevailing construction costs in Japan should be considered. Without this comparative analysis, it's difficult to definitively state if the price represents excellent or fair value, highlighting a potential risk area if costs are inflated.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and oversight mechanisms in place to ensure the successful and timely completion of the facility, and what are the consequences for non-performance?
Effective oversight is critical for any large construction project. Key KPIs should include adherence to schedule, budget, quality standards, and safety regulations. Robust oversight mechanisms, such as regular site inspections, progress reports, and clear contractual remedies for delays or deficiencies, are essential to mitigate risks and ensure the facility meets its intended operational purpose.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912HV17B0002
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Gilbane, Inc. (UEI: 022726165)
Address: 3-12-2, NIHOMBASHIKAYABACHO, CHUO-KU
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,345,384
Exercised Options: $28,345,384
Current Obligation: $28,345,384
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-08-08
Current End Date: 2020-08-31
Potential End Date: 2020-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-05-12
More Contracts from Gilbane Japan GK
- PA00109 Dodea Replace Kinnick High School, Commander Fleet Activities (CFA), Yokosuka, Japan — $129.1M (Department of Defense)
- MIL CON Corrosion Control Hanger Yokota AIR Base Japan — $98.9M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build Repair IS for 353RD Special Operations Wing (SOW) Operations Facility Building 3524 Roof IAW SOW Dated 22 MAY 2025 — $53.1M (Department of Defense)
- FY2202 Znre254300 Improve Family Housing, Yokota AIR Base, Phase 8 (45 UN) - Paip8 — $44.8M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of Airfield Damage Repair Equipment Storage Facility, Yokota AIR Base, Japan — $39.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)