DoD Awards $32.2M for Taxiway B Repair, Facing Limited Competition Amidst Infrastructure Needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,244,150 ($32.2M)

Contractor: PCC Ventures

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-11-26

End Date: 2025-01-05

Contract Duration: 771 days

Daily Burn Rate: $41.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TAXIWAY B REPAIR OF PAAF TAXIWAYS

Place of Performance

Location: FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28301

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.2 million to PCC VENTURES for work described as: TAXIWAY B REPAIR OF PAAF TAXIWAYS Key points: 1. Significant investment in critical airfield infrastructure for the Department of the Army. 2. Competition was limited, raising questions about price discovery and potential cost efficiencies. 3. The contract's firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but the limited competition is a risk. 4. Construction sector spending for infrastructure projects remains a key area for federal oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award of $32.2M for taxiway repair appears within a reasonable range for large-scale construction projects. However, without detailed cost breakdowns and comparison to similar airfield repair contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. The limited competition may have inflated the final price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a limited competitive environment. This method can restrict the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to higher prices than a fully open competition might yield. Price discovery may have been less robust.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible price for this essential infrastructure repair. Further justification for the exclusion of sources is needed to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Ensures operational readiness and safety of critical military aviation infrastructure. Supports economic activity through construction contracts, though competition limitations are noted. Highlights the ongoing need for infrastructure investment within federal agencies. Potential for increased costs due to restricted bidding processes.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition may lead to higher costs.
  • Lack of transparency in source exclusion.
  • Long contract duration (771 days) increases risk exposure.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
  • Addresses critical infrastructure needs for national defense.
  • Awarded to a known entity (PCC Ventures).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction sector, a significant area of federal spending for infrastructure maintenance and upgrades. Benchmarks for similar airfield repairs are essential for evaluating cost-effectiveness, especially given the limited competition.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Federal efforts to ensure small business participation in large construction projects should be reviewed in the context of this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial to ensure the quality of work and adherence to the contract terms, especially given the limited competition. The Department of the Army's contracting activity should provide clear justification for the exclusion of sources to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition raises concerns about price fairness.
  • Potential for cost overruns if contractor contingency is high.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Long contract duration increases exposure to unforeseen risks.

Tags

highway-street-and-bridge-construction, department-of-defense, nc, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.2 million to PCC VENTURES. TAXIWAY B REPAIR OF PAAF TAXIWAYS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PCC VENTURES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-11-26. End: 2025-01-05.

What specific factors necessitated the exclusion of sources, and how was the final price determined to be fair and reasonable under these constraints?

The justification for excluding certain sources needs to be thoroughly documented and reviewed by oversight bodies. Without this, it's difficult to ascertain if the limited competition resulted in a fair price. The contracting officer must demonstrate that the price reflects market conditions as closely as possible, even with a reduced bidder pool, potentially through detailed cost analysis and comparison to historical data for similar projects.

What are the potential long-term implications of awarding infrastructure contracts with limited competition on overall federal spending efficiency?

Consistently awarding contracts with limited competition can establish a precedent that reduces incentives for contractors to offer competitive pricing. Over time, this can lead to inflated costs for essential services and infrastructure, diminishing the overall efficiency of federal spending. It also limits opportunities for new or smaller businesses to enter the market and compete, potentially stifling innovation and reducing the available supplier base.

How does the firm fixed-price structure mitigate risks associated with the 771-day contract duration and potential unforeseen issues during taxiway repair?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract shifts most of the risk to the contractor, obligating them to complete the work for a predetermined price regardless of actual costs incurred. This structure provides budget certainty for the government and incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently. However, for long-duration projects with potential for unforeseen site conditions, the contractor may build in significant contingency, potentially leading to a higher initial price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionHighway, Street, and Bridge ConstructionHighway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912HN22B3004

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4477 E 5TH AVE, COLUMBUS, OH, 43219

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,615,892

Exercised Options: $32,244,150

Current Obligation: $32,244,150

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-11-26

Current End Date: 2025-01-05

Potential End Date: 2025-01-05 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-23

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending