DoD Awards $9.9M Construction Contract to Enola-Caddell JV for Army Facility
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,907,283 ($9.9M)
Contractor: Enola- Caddell, JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-02-27
End Date: 2005-09-06
Contract Duration: 557 days
Daily Burn Rate: $17.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: GOLDSBORO, WAYNE County, NORTH CAROLINA, 27532
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $9.9 million to ENOLA- CADDELL, JV for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded for commercial and institutional building construction. 2. Full and open competition was utilized after excluding sources. 3. The contract value is $9,907,283. 4. The contract duration is 557 days. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $9.9M for construction services appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar commercial and institutional building construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, though a detailed cost analysis would confirm optimal value.
Public Impact
Supports military infrastructure development. Provides construction services for a government facility. Creates jobs in the construction sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts.
- Limited information on specific construction scope.
- Exclusion of sources may warrant further review.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Clear contract duration specified.
- Awarded to a joint venture, potentially bringing diverse expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Construction sector, specifically for commercial and institutional buildings. Spending in this sector is often project-driven and influenced by infrastructure needs and government facility maintenance requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the award was made to a joint venture (Enola-Caddell, JV) and does not specify if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis is needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard procurement oversight processes would apply, focusing on contract performance and adherence to terms.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential lack of transparency in source exclusion.
- Fixed-price contract risks.
- Limited detail on project specifics.
- Unclear small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, nc, dca, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $9.9 million to ENOLA- CADDELL, JV. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENOLA- CADDELL, JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-02-27. End: 2005-09-06.
What specific type of facility is being constructed or renovated, and what is the estimated cost per square foot compared to industry benchmarks?
The provided data identifies the work as 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' but lacks specifics on the facility type or size. To assess value, a comparison of the contract's cost per square foot against industry benchmarks for similar government facilities would be necessary. This would help determine if the $9.9M award represents a competitive and efficient use of taxpayer funds for the scope of work.
What were the specific reasons for excluding other sources during the 'full and open competition' phase, and did this exclusion impact the final price?
The contract description 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests that while the competition was open, certain potential sources were initially excluded. Understanding the justification for these exclusions is crucial. If legitimate reasons existed, it might not impact price negatively. However, if the exclusion was arbitrary, it could have limited competition and potentially led to a less favorable price for the government.
How will the performance and quality of the construction be monitored to ensure the facility meets requirements and taxpayer expectations?
Effective oversight of construction contracts is vital. The Department of the Army would typically assign contracting officers' representatives (CORs) or quality assurance personnel to monitor progress, adherence to specifications, and overall quality of work. Regular site inspections, progress reports, and milestone reviews are standard mechanisms to ensure the project is completed successfully and meets all contractual obligations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 1414 MAIN ST STE 9B, CHIPLEY, FL, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,551
Exercised Options: $12,551
Current Obligation: $9,907,283
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-02-27
Current End Date: 2005-09-06
Potential End Date: 2005-09-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-02-04
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)