Army Corps of Engineers Awards $60.1M for Non-Building Facilities Construction in North Dakota
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,665,393 ($11.7M)
Contractor: C & J Builders/Gowan Construction Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-22
End Date: 2008-11-30
Contract Duration: 1,196 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200512!500523!96CE!W912ES!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT ST PAUL !W912ES05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050822!20061231!601303220!601303220!601303220!N!C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCT!2525 N 43RD ST !GRAND FORKS !ND!58203!32060!035!38!GRAND FORKS !GRAND FORKS !N DAKOTA !+000001000000!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!K! !D!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!E! ! ! !D!A!000!A!B!Y!P!N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: GRAND FORKS, GRAND FORKS County, NORTH DAKOTA, 58201
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCTION INC for work described as: 200512!500523!96CE!W912ES!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT ST PAUL !W912ES05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050822!20061231!601303220!601303220!601303220!N!C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCT!2525 N 43RD ST !GRAND FORKS !ND!58203!32060!035!38!GRAND FORKS !GRAN… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded for "ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES" construction. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a structured procurement process. 3. The contract value is substantial, suggesting a significant infrastructure project. 4. The sector is Construction, specifically heavy and civil engineering. 5. The award was made to C & J Builders/Gowan Construction Inc.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $60.1M for a 1196-day duration appears reasonable for large-scale civil engineering construction. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The "FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES" indicates that multiple bids were solicited, but certain sources were excluded. This method aims for competition while potentially streamlining the process. The final price is likely a result of this competitive bidding.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process is intended to secure the best value for taxpayers, ensuring funds are used efficiently for necessary infrastructure.
Public Impact
Local economy in Grand Forks, North Dakota, likely benefits from construction jobs and related services. Infrastructure improvements in the region could enhance operational capabilities for the Army Corps of Engineers. Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process aimed at cost-effectiveness for federal projects. The project contributes to the broader construction sector's economic activity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for project completion.
- Scope creep could increase final costs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process.
- Clear project scope defined.
- Fixed-price contract type can limit cost uncertainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which is critical for national infrastructure. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government funding priorities and economic conditions.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to C & J Builders/Gowan Construction Inc. It is not explicitly stated whether this is a small business, but the scale of the contract suggests it may be a larger entity or a joint venture. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight mechanisms for federal construction projects, including site inspections and progress reporting, would be in place to ensure compliance and quality.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns.
- Contract duration is lengthy, increasing exposure to market fluctuations.
- Complexity of "non-building facilities" could lead to unforeseen issues.
- Reliance on a joint venture or specific contractor may limit future options.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, nd, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCTION INC. 200512!500523!96CE!W912ES!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT ST PAUL !W912ES05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050822!20061231!601303220!601303220!601303220!N!C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCT!2525 N 43RD ST !GRAND FORKS !ND!58203!32060!035!38!GRAND FORKS !GRAND FORKS !N DAKOTA !+000001000000!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is C & J BUILDERS/GOWAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-22. End: 2008-11-30.
What specific types of "non-building facilities" are included in this contract, and how do they align with the Army Corps of Engineers' mission in the St. Paul district?
The contract specifies "ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES." This broad category could encompass a range of infrastructure such as roads, bridges, levees, airfields, utilities, or specialized support structures. Understanding the precise nature of these facilities is crucial for assessing their alignment with the Army Corps of Engineers' mission, which typically involves civil works, navigation, flood control, and military infrastructure support within their designated districts.
What were the criteria for excluding certain sources in the "full and open competition after exclusion of sources" process, and how might this have impacted the final price?
The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific qualifications, past performance, or technical capabilities are required that only a subset of potential bidders can meet. While this can streamline the selection process, it might limit the breadth of competition. If the excluded sources were highly competitive, their absence could potentially lead to a higher final price than if the competition had been entirely unrestricted. The specific reasons for exclusion would need to be documented by the contracting agency.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure project effectiveness and value for money?
Key performance indicators for a construction contract of this nature would likely include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship meeting specified standards, safety compliance on-site, and completion within the contracted budget. Effectiveness would be measured by the successful delivery of the specified non-building facilities in a functional state. Value for money is assessed through the final cost relative to the delivered scope and quality, compared against initial estimates and market benchmarks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2525 N 43RD ST, GRAND FORKS, ND, 58203
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-22
Current End Date: 2008-11-30
Potential End Date: 2008-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-03-30
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)