DoD awards $4.5M for NASAMS command-and-control facility design, with AECOM-B&V JV selected
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,533,640 ($4.5M)
Contractor: Aecom-B&v Middle East JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-11-19
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 223 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN CHARRETTE FOR THE NASAMS COMMAND-AND-CONTROL AND SUPPORTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE SUBHAN MILITARY COMPLEX.
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $4.5 million to AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JV for work described as: REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN CHARRETTE FOR THE NASAMS COMMAND-AND-CONTROL AND SUPPORTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE SUBHAN MILITARY COMPLEX. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on pre-design assessment and charrette for critical military infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 4. Project duration of 223 days suggests a focused, short-term engagement. 5. Engineering services sector is vital for military base development and modernization. 6. Delivery order structure implies it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $4.5 million for pre-design and charrette services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar military facility design contracts is challenging without more specific project details. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government has a clear understanding of costs, and the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive environment is expected to drive better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the process itself indicates a commitment to exploring the market.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a marketplace that can lead to more cost-effective solutions and prevent price gouging.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and the military personnel who will utilize the new NASAMS command-and-control facilities. The services delivered include crucial pre-design assessments and design charrettes, laying the groundwork for facility construction. The geographic impact is focused on the Subhan Military Complex. This contract supports specialized engineering and design roles within the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if initial assessments are not clearly defined.
- Reliance on contractor expertise for critical design elements requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract mitigates cost uncertainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
- Clear requirement for pre-design assessment and charrette indicates a structured approach to project initiation.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the defense industrial base. The market for military facility design and engineering is substantial, driven by ongoing modernization efforts and global security requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large-scale military construction or renovation projects, where design and pre-construction services represent a significant upfront investment.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Given the specialized nature of military command-and-control facility design, it is likely that larger, experienced firms with specific defense contracting capabilities were sought. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would typically be detailed in the contract award documentation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer and technical representatives within the Department of the Army. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by placing cost risk on the contractor. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific details of the charrette outcomes may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Facility Design Services
- Command and Control Systems
- Engineering Consulting Services
- Defense Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope definition issues
- Reliance on contractor expertise
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, military-facilities, command-and-control, pre-design-assessment, design-charrette, middle-east
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $4.5 million to AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JV. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN CHARRETTE FOR THE NASAMS COMMAND-AND-CONTROL AND SUPPORTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE SUBHAN MILITARY COMPLEX.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-11-19. End: 2026-06-30.
What is the track record of AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JV in delivering similar pre-design and facility assessment services for military clients?
Assessing the track record of AECOM-B&V MIDDLE EAST JV requires a deep dive into their past performance on Department of Defense (DoD) contracts, specifically those involving pre-design assessments, charrettes, and command-and-control facility development. Publicly available data may include contract histories, past performance reviews (if released), and any reported issues or successes. A thorough analysis would involve examining the complexity and scale of previous projects, client satisfaction feedback, and adherence to schedules and budgets. Without specific contract details or performance reports, it's difficult to definitively gauge their expertise, but their selection under full and open competition suggests they met initial qualification criteria.
How does the $4.5 million contract value compare to similar pre-design and charrette services for military facilities?
Benchmarking the $4.5 million contract value for pre-design and charrette services requires comparison with similar projects within the Department of Defense or other government agencies. Factors influencing cost include the size and complexity of the facility, the specific requirements of the assessment and charrette, the geographic location, and the level of detail required. For a command-and-control facility, which often involves sophisticated technological integration and security considerations, this value could be considered moderate to high, depending on the scope. A comprehensive comparison would involve analyzing data from contracts for similar services on bases or installations of comparable size and strategic importance.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep if the initial assessment requirements are not precisely defined, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays, despite the firm-fixed-price structure. Another risk is the reliance on the contractor's expertise for critical design decisions, which necessitates robust government oversight. Mitigation strategies likely include detailed performance work statements, clear deliverables, regular progress reviews, and potentially independent government cost estimates. The firm-fixed-price contract itself is a primary risk mitigation tool, transferring cost overrun risk to the contractor. The short duration also limits the window for significant deviations.
What is the expected effectiveness of the NASAMS command-and-control facility once designed, and how does this contract contribute to that?
The effectiveness of the NASAMS command-and-control facility hinges on its design, which this contract directly addresses. The pre-design assessment and charrette are crucial early steps to ensure the facility will meet operational requirements, integrate necessary technology, provide adequate security, and support personnel efficiently. A well-executed design process, facilitated by this contract, should lead to a facility that enhances situational awareness, improves communication, and supports the overall mission readiness of the NASAMS system. The contract's contribution is foundational, ensuring the design phase starts with a clear, agreed-upon vision and scope.
What are the historical spending patterns for engineering and design services related to military facilities within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending patterns for engineering and design services within the Department of the Army are substantial, reflecting continuous investment in infrastructure modernization, new construction, and upgrades to existing facilities. This spending is often categorized under military construction (MILCON) budgets, as well as operations and maintenance (O&M) funds for facility improvements. Trends typically show significant outlays for architectural and engineering (A&E) services, especially for complex projects like command centers, training facilities, and operational bases. Spending can fluctuate based on geopolitical priorities, budget allocations, and the lifecycle of military assets, with peaks occurring during periods of major force structure changes or new equipment fielding.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM
Address: 10 S JEFFERSON ST STE 1600, ROANOKE, VA, 24011
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,631,974
Exercised Options: $4,533,640
Current Obligation: $4,533,640
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912ER25D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-11-19
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-09
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)