Department of Defense awards $9.4M facilities maintenance contract to Interdyne Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,413,563 ($9.4M)

Contractor: Interdyne Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-06-17

End Date: 2026-02-16

Contract Duration: 1,340 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE EGYPT A&A FACILITIES.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.4 million to INTERDYNE CORP for work described as: FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE EGYPT A&A FACILITIES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. The contract duration of 1340 days suggests a long-term need for these services. 3. Awarded to a single contractor, raising questions about competitive pricing. 4. The services fall under Facilities Support Services, a common government requirement. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $9.4M contract for facility maintenance services is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. However, the lack of competition means there's no direct market comparison to assess if the pricing is optimal or if a more competitive process could have yielded better value. Further analysis would require understanding the scope of services and the specific facilities covered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor can provide the required goods or services, or in specific emergency situations. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to drive down prices and ensure the best possible value.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to offer the most economical price. It also reduces opportunities for other qualified businesses to secure government contracts.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel who rely on well-maintained facilities. Services delivered include essential facility maintenance, ensuring operational readiness. The geographic impact is localized to the specific A&A facilities in Egypt. Workforce implications are likely for the contractor, Interdyne Corp., requiring skilled maintenance personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
  • Sole-source award limits transparency in pricing justification.
  • Contract duration without clear performance benchmarks could pose risks.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
  • Long-term contract indicates a stable, ongoing need for services.
  • Award to an established entity suggests potential for reliable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government and commercial buildings. The market for these services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. This specific contract, while substantial at $9.4M, represents a small portion of the overall federal spending in this sector, which includes everything from janitorial services to complex building system maintenance.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited, and the primary award went to a larger entity. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is minimal for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, but contract details should be publicly available through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

  • Base Operations Support Services
  • Logistics and Facilities Management
  • Government Property Management

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
  • Lack of performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
  • Geopolitical risks in Egypt could impact service delivery.

Tags

facility-maintenance, facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, egypt, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, not-competed, sole-source, interdyne-corp

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.4 million to INTERDYNE CORP. FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE EGYPT A&A FACILITIES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTERDYNE CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-17. End: 2026-02-16.

What is Interdyne Corp.'s track record with the Department of Defense and similar facility maintenance contracts?

Interdyne Corp. has a history of performing various services for the federal government, including facility maintenance and support. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those with the Department of Defense or other agencies requiring facility support services, would be crucial. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any reported contract disputes or terminations, and their ability to meet delivery schedules and quality standards. A review of their contract history would reveal the extent of their experience and reliability in managing large-scale facility maintenance operations, providing context for this current award.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar facility maintenance contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?

Direct price comparison is difficult without detailed service scope and location specifics. However, the $9.4 million price tag over approximately 3.6 years (1340 days) suggests an average annual cost of roughly $2.6 million. To benchmark this, one would need to identify comparable contracts for facility maintenance services in similar geographic regions or for facilities of comparable size and complexity. Factors like labor costs, specific maintenance requirements (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing, groundskeeping), and security protocols significantly influence pricing. The absence of competition for this award means a direct market-driven price comparison is not feasible, making internal benchmarking against historical DoD contracts or industry standards essential.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this facility maintenance contract. Typically, such contracts would include detailed metrics related to response times for maintenance requests, preventative maintenance schedules, facility uptime, energy efficiency targets, and customer satisfaction. These KPIs and SLAs are critical for measuring contractor performance and ensuring the government receives the expected value. Without this information, it is challenging to assess the effectiveness of Interdyne Corp.'s service delivery and the overall success of the contract beyond its basic execution.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility maintenance services at the Egypt A&A facilities?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for facility maintenance at the Egypt A&A facilities. To understand this, one would need to access historical contract databases and procurement records for these specific facilities. Analyzing past contracts, including their value, duration, and awarded contractors, would reveal trends in spending, identify potential cost increases or decreases over time, and highlight any changes in the scope of services. This historical context is vital for assessing whether the current $9.4 million award represents a reasonable increase or decrease compared to previous investments in maintaining these facilities.

Are there any specific risks associated with performing facility maintenance services in Egypt for the Department of Defense?

Performing facility maintenance services in Egypt for the Department of Defense can involve several risks. These may include geopolitical instability in the region, which could affect personnel safety and supply chain logistics. Additionally, navigating local regulations, labor laws, and cultural nuances can present challenges. Security risks associated with operating on a military installation in a foreign country are also a significant consideration. Furthermore, the logistical complexities of transporting materials, equipment, and personnel to the site, as well as potential currency exchange rate fluctuations, could impact cost and project timelines. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract places the burden of managing these risks primarily on the contractor, Interdyne Corp.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W912ER22R0043

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 20513 QUEENSDALE DR, CORNELIUS, NC, 28031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,437,890

Exercised Options: $9,837,890

Current Obligation: $9,413,563

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-06-17

Current End Date: 2026-02-16

Potential End Date: 2026-02-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-16

More Contracts from Interdyne Corp

View all Interdyne Corp federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending